Some think that young people should be free to choose any career they like, while others say that they should think more realistically about their future. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Selecting a profession has always been a task of paramount importance for the youth. It is often argued that they should be allowed freedom to choose an occupation according to their preference, while others think that they should be more practical and ponder about their future profoundly.
The propensity of young pursuing liberty when it comes to choosing their occupations stems from the fact that they are vulnerable to a broad range of knowledge of the things they are passionate about, making them ardent followers of the belief that seeking engagement into an endeavor that appeals to them can fetch them laurels, in the form of fame and fortune.
Also, they can be more productive if they are allowed to choose their jobs themselves and they can contribute more effort in gaining proficiency in the field they chose, bolstering their work efficiency. Conversely, as many suggest that if they are pushed into something that fails to address their aspirations, they may lead an unsatisfied life confined to an unwanted domain.
However, some argue that ‘All that glitters is not gold’: youngsters should judiciously weigh their future options; they might land up in jobs that are poorly compensated, or they might be wedded to something that predisposes them to stagnation, making it impossible to make amendments later. They must not fall prey to the temptation of short-term prominently highlighted by employers. Hence, they must seriously do some brain storming and pondering about the future prospects before engaging professionally.
Overall, even though youngsters can be more productive and happy if they choose their careers themselves, they should prioritize the gains they are likely to derive in the long run from the job they take up. Striking a balance between natural inclination and long-term prospects must be struck.
