Many pharmaceutical companies advertise their medications on television and the radio. Some people say this is inappropriate, as it can lead to people seeking prescriptions, rather than diagnosing the root problem. Others believe it is important to spread awareness for all solutions. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

 Many pharmaceutical companies advertise their medications on television and the radio. Some people say this is inappropriate, as it can lead to people seeking prescriptions, rather than diagnosing the root problem. Others believe it is important to spread awareness for all solutions.

Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Aggressive publicity of medicinal products has become ubiquitous, raising ethical concerns arising out of this practice promoting faulty self-analysis and misuse, but there is some advocacy too, on grounds of enlightenment these initiatives create. Thus, it becomes imperative to critically analyze the merits of both aspects. 

Heralding availability of drugs is blamed for jeopardising public health by encouraging unnecessary consumption, and predisposing users to unwarranted complications. Advertisements of medicines notoriously coax consumers into believing the products being safe, and offering panacea for several medical conditions, often deepening engagement; exposing many to side-effects. To corroborate, all forms of media are overflowing with ads of cough syrups, promising an instant relief from sore throat and bad cold, but making many, especially afflicted by neuro complications,  vulnerable to severe medical conditions, like brain strokes.   

Moreover, this is bound to have an enduring impact on the wellness of the ones afflicted with serious illnesses: they start forgoing the formally prescribed therapeutic interventions, and switch to advertised remedies, which can exacerbate the disease, and threaten life also. To corroborate, during the pandemic in 2020, more perished by consuming remedies advertised as effective cure than succumbing to Covid itself.        

However, the only consolation of this policy is informing people about the symptoms of ailments and disorders, even the subtle ones, along with the description of treatment. Many admit, particularly those suffering from issues such as depression, have started realizing their medical conditions, and started discussing them more openly without inhibitions, and seeking appropriate therapeutic interventions. 

Overall, although it might be impossible to completely outlaw advertisements featuring medications, drug manufacturers presenting adverts of medications must be reined in, by regulating the content, to help prevent unethical practices; unrestrained advertising could menace public health, and make people susceptible to dire health consequences.    

Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema. Other say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema. Other say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema. 

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Technology-driven miniaturization has made entertainment, especially watching movies, portable, and many are drawn to it; can it really dent the reputation of movie theaters, is a million dollar question. However, I doubt that this can happen; the latter offers unique experiences that cannot be replicated on small screens. 

Apprehensions  about cinema halls losing favor are gaining impetus from the steeply soaring numbers being tempted by the unprecedented convenience and economy offered by portable modes of engaging with films. One does not need to adhere to the schedule of shows, wait for a formal release, or travel to designated venues, but they can instead explore content complementing their choice - regardless of their location, even while traveling - and play and replay the scenes they find fascinating. Moreover,  hand-held devices allow big savings in terms of money, otherwise spent on procuring expensive show-tickets. These factors make it almost certain, as per some, that these conventional mediums, once frequented by huge crowds,  may become history. 

However, despite the doomsday predictions about cinema halls vanishing, these are likely to endure and  retain their charm:  they have quickly adapted themselves to counter the impact of technology, and started integrating features - like surround sound, and 3-D and 4-D effects, among others,  to afford unmatched experience - and keeping their clients enticed. Similarly, visiting cinema halls is a social ritual for many, a means of affording a chance to escape the mundane, socialize, and view  motion pictures in an environment that sans distractions. 

In hindsight, undeniably, although the digital footprint in entertainment, by affording unprecedented flexibility, is bound to expand, it hardly threatens movie halls, for the latter have their own distinct allure: unparalleled watching experience, and pleasure, and these both means will coexist, rather than compete with each other.     

In the past, most working people had only one job. However, nowadays, more and more people have more than one job at the same time. What are the reasons for this development? What are the advantages and disadvantages of having more than one job?

In the past, most working people had only one job. However, nowadays, more and more people have more than one job at the same time.
What are the reasons for this development?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of having more than one job?

What are the reasons for this development?

• To make ends meet in times when the cost of living is extremely high 
• To afford better facilities and improve quality of life
• To create buffer for emergencies and also autumn years
• To create job security 
• To switch careers 
• To develop skills in multiple areas
• Sometimes many aim to establish their  own business someday, and multiple careers can give a broader exposure and also help create diverse network 

Benefits 

• Reduces dependence on others for continued subsistence 
• Creates better opportunities for a good life for self and the kin
• Do not have to suffer in tough times 
• Can create a versatile network 

Drawbacks 

• Hampers work life balance
• Impacts health issues 
• Can cause marital discord

Economic compulsions are forcing many to engage in multiple professions, turning this propensity into a ubiquitous phenomenon, and  I feel that it can bring rich dividends, overall, despite having certain pitfalls. 

Inflation has  adversely impacted purchasing power, compelling a growing number of people, regardless of age, to work for more than one employer. Similarly, the intensifying competition for employment has resulted in a decline in wage rates, leaving workers with few options but to work in different occupations simultaneously. These two aspects are duly substantiated by the International Labor Organisation 2024 report, stating that financial constraints posed by rising prices,  and low paying jobs, are fueling this inclination. 

This penchant is proving to be extremely advantageous, in terms of helping amass sufficient monetary resources to act as a buffer against uncertainties presented by soaring cost of living, inadequate compensation, unannounced emergencies: medical, and so on. Moreover, one can also create financial reserves  to cushion life in autumn years, thereby nearly eliminating the need to depend on others.  To illustrate, a majority of Japanese follow this pattern, and admit creating enough savings to handle financial obligations in young years efficiently, and lead a life in twilight years comfortably. 

However, this proclivity can turn lifestyles into chaos, wherein every sphere - from professional and personal  to familial and social - can fall into disarray, causing mental agony. Additionally, overwork, resulting from multiple professional engagements, could have severe ramifications for physical and mental wellness. Nevertheless, these complications can be surmounted by carefully navigating through personal and professional domains, and taking regular breaks from work.

Overall, financial compulsions are the primary factors underpinning this phenomenon, and if people balance their professional, and other domains, judiciously, they can lead a comfortable and satisfying life, and avoid unfavorable impact. 

Some people argue that all experimentation on animals is bad and should be outlawed. However, others believe that important scientific discoveries can be made from animal experiments. Can experimentation on animals be justified? Are there any alternatives?

 Some people argue that all experimentation on animals is bad and should be outlawed. However, others believe that important scientific discoveries can be made from animal experiments. Can experimentation on animals be justified? Are there any alternatives?

Clinical trials on animals have long roused bitter controversies, with some deriding this practice, deeming it cruel, and demanding prohibition, whereas others claim that such research remains essential for major scientific and medical breakthroughs. I believe in the absence of more credible options, such procedures must continue.  

Those opposing treat such endeavors with indignation, and argue that it is unethical to harm living creatures for human benefit: subjecting them to pain, fear and distress, toxic substances, and surgeries, or behavioural studies raises moral concerns. Similarly, many maintain that humans are not entitled to exploit animals simply because they cannot defend themselves. 

Nevertheless, supporters of this system vehemently defend such activities; they are pivotal to the development of life-saving medicines and understanding diseases. Historically, several breakthroughs - such as vaccines for polio and rabies - were achieved through animal studies. Researchers argue that before prescribing drugs to humans, evaluating their safety on animals is critical, for this can help circumvent severe side effects, justifying controlled and regulated use of this method for the sake of mankind.  

Although the opponents suggest that advancements in technology have introduced several state-of-the-art alternatives: laboratory testing using human cells, computer simulations, and artificial intelligence to predict toxicity and drug interactions, these  machine-based models are prone  to producing unpredictable outcomes that fail to clearly predict the impact of simulation tested substances  on the human  body, making it quite risky to release such products for human consumption, upholding the need for continuation of such exploration.   

Overall, while animal experimentation raises serious ethical concerns, it can still be deemed warranted  in cases where the research is essential for medical progress, but lacks any plausible alternatives. Nonetheless, continued investment in modern scientific methods should be encouraged so that dependence on animal testing can be gradually mitigated.

Some people post their social news and information on social media. Is it a good thing or bad thing?Give answers with relevant examples.

Some people post their social news and information on social media. Is it a good thing or bad thing?Give answers with relevant examples. 

Making private domains public through social networking sites has  become a vogue, nonetheless it exposes one to myriad benefits as well as pitfalls. However, I believe that this propensity is, although rewarding, surfeit engagement should be circumvented at all costs. 

Propagating information about personal and  social realms through virtual social platforms has made it possible for many to seek solutions for the complications facing them. The explosion in number of online weak ties  has made it possible to gain reviews and  suggestions from an increasing number of users with whom one is not directly acquainted with, engendering  a wider social network that proves to be socially assuring, something deemed impossible formerly, and one is not left to own device in contingencies. For instance, many unemployed admit gaining access to job offers  through friends of friends. 

Similarly, this proclivity has also made it possible to spread word about the work, especially in the realm of art, without needing to part with huge sums of money. To corroborate, several artists, musicians, painters and writers have gained fame by making their work virtually accessible with the help of platforms like Facebook and Instagram, among others. 

However, carelessly disseminating intimate information to a wider audience can often make users susceptible to umpteen shortcomings, for internet-driven social networks circulate inputs to even deviant  minds, who later use those  details for subversive objectives,  ranging from stalking, identity theft, and  even committing robberies. The rising cases of cyber bullying and unsolicited attempts to intimidate people across the world  truly substantiate this concern. 

Hence, affording news about personal and social domains to followers on online  networking applications can help fetch benefits galore: fame and remedies for surmounting challenges, and  is a favorable evolution, but only if these endeavors are undertaken judiciously.  

The leaders of most organizations tend to be older people. However, some argue that younger people make better bosses.

 The leaders of most organizations tend to be older people. However, some argue that younger people make better bosses.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Do younger people make better boses? 

Yes 

• They are better equipped with the knowledge of their surroundings, by virtue of being educated in an environment that is influenced by modern concepts

• They are energetic and can set precedents easily for their subordinates  and sometimes are not authoritative  

• They are tech savvy and can use modern technology to make decisions 

NO

• Leadership qualities, like creating strategies and alternatives plans,  only are augmented with seasoning: those who have been through the thick and thin can only plan effectively and lead their team 

• Their attitude sans Experience that builds temperament and an attitude that teaches to manage resources well - every worker  

• Exposure also provides with a pragmatic vision, allowing near accurate predictions, which they lack  

• Are not unbiased

The modern school of thought believes that individuals in their younger years are better suited to occupy leadership positions than their older counterparts. In my opinion, this perception can be deemed as appropriate in certain cases. 

Those  leaning in the favor of this arrangement found their argument on the fact that young bosses are energetic, and participate in every organizational endeavor from the front rather than simply passing orders from their cubicles. This aspect helps keep the workforce motivated as they feel that their seniors are sharing the burden instead of simply shifting it to the juniors, helping derive optimum outputs. There are abundant specimens(examples) of such setups, especially in construction, shipping and marketing wherein managers selected must be below a certain age, so that they can play a participative role and persuade their subordinates to emulate(copy).

On top of that, the modern generation is quite tech savvy and capable of using state-of-the-art concepts and tools to assess the situation, discover and implement solutions, and evaluate the performance of every component and resource under their control, effectively, fetching them the ability to manage operations more efficiently and decisively. 

Nevertheless, even though the former claims are valid, taking ownership is a highly complicated task that can only be achieved by those having seasoning, pragmatic vision, and patience by their side, something that the youth lack. This is the only reason why commanding positions in military, expensive research and development undertakings, and gigantic corporations, have people in their middle ages since they have the right temperament to guide the whole organization.

In hindsight, managerial positions in contemporary times require energy, knowledge of technology together with the right approach. The first two factors need youthful exuberance while the third can only be handled effectively by the experienced.  

In schools and universities, some girls tend to choose arts subjects, while boys choose to study science subjects. What are the reasons? Do you think this trend should be changed?

 In schools and universities, some girls tend to choose arts subjects, while boys choose to study science subjects. What are the reasons? Do you think this trend should be changed?

Reasons 

• Orthodox beliefs that create such differences 

• Dearth of role models 

• 
  

Why to change this trend  

• This will ensure creating equal opportunities for both sexes 

• Restrict opportunities for both sexes 

• Can prevent society from harnessing versatile skills that predominantly attitude and personality based rather than gender based 

• Allow  fostering broader skills range for all  

Female learners are usually seen opting for the humanities stream,while males prefer STEM.This can be attributed to several reasons, but must be halted as quickly as possible,for such orthodox social stereotyping is harming society.

To commence with, the primary driver of this pattern is the traditional thought process that has created gaps between the expectations from both the sexes.Traditionally,women have been vested(assigned) with the task of looking up to the family and rearing offspring, and thus, if they are expected to engage in professional endeavors, they are persuaded to join domains that require minimal investment of time and efforts.However, males have always donned the rules of begetters (bread earners),so such selection preferences have been hard wired into their brains, and seeking anything else is considered below their dignity.

Having said that,banishing this arrangement holds critical value for the progressive future of mankind;this will help remove misconceptions about occupations being dependent on specific qualities exhibited by each sex,and create equitable opportunities for all, based on their individual aptitude rather than them being males or females. For instance,  female scientists and engineers have proven that  technology and research are not the forte of only men, and similarly male artists have firmly established that art is also their cup to tea. Moreover, eliminating this misconception(ill-conceived perception) will help society tremendously since it will be able to harness the skills of every inhabitant in all fields, whether it is technical or creative. 

In hindsight, societal norms are the biggest hurdles in the path of blurring sex-based inequality in the occupational realm;therefore, getting rid of obsolete aspirations is critical for creating a society that optimally utilises its human resources , instead of impeding the progress  of pivotal professional acumen.

A great gender-based variance is observed when it comes to selecting subjects out of formal curriculum, with females opting for humanities stream, and males preferring STEM.This harmful pattern is driven by orthodox social stereotypes, and must be eradicated.

INTRODUCTION

Nowadays many young people are drawn towards dangerous sports. What makes them so attractive? What measures should be taken to regulate such sports and minimise the risks?

 Nowadays many young people are drawn towards dangerous sports. What makes them so attractive? What measures should be taken to regulate such sports and minimise the risks?

• What measures should be taken to regulate such sports and minimise the risks?

• What makes them so attractive? 

Nowadays many young people are drawn towards dangerous sports. 

Causes 

• The youth of today wants to explore something that has not been done: man has discovered the whole planet

• It is human propensity to seek adventure: which can only happen if something unorthodox is done. 

• An  inclination to hog the limelight is pulling more and more into such activities 

• The recklessness and the intent to address the adrenaline rush is pushing many into such activities 

What measures can mitigate the risks? 

• The state should ensure that such acts are performed under the watchful eyes of trained experts 

• Quality training gear should be mandated 

• Proper training should be imparted  to probable practitioners by qualified trainers 

• Proper safeguards should be adopted and deployed 

• Practitioners should be enlightened about the associated perils. 

In the modern world, the youth is embracing extreme sports such as paragliding, bungee jumping and many more. This trend is driven by myriads of reasons. I would elaborate all the plausible causes, as well as suggest measures to alleviate the risks.

The  media plays a vital role in pushing the youngsters to engage in such endeavors as it presents numerous entertainment videos and the celebrities who take part in these activities, and upload their video clips. This makes the young audience curious, and promotes them to indulge in such acts. In addition to this, to hog the limelight, especially on social media, forces the youngsters to participate in these activities that have hazards, but are thrilling too since it will fetch them fame and fortune. To corroborate, a survey has been undertaken by Miss Celia proves this: most of the participants partake in the adventurous sporting activities virtue of the prize money involved as well as a chance to get fan following on the internet.

To mitigate threats involved in such sports, some prudent measures should be adopted. The organizations conducting such events should provide the partakers with appropriate training and ensure taking safeguards at the time of the procedure. Similarly,  they should take the onus of maintaining safety levels such as using standardized equipment, hiring experienced and qualified trainers, and performers to make sure that when such activities are performed,  the participants are well-informed about the process and safety measures, and do sports under expert monitoring.     

To recap, as extreme sporting undertakings offer excitement and happiness to the young people, the latter will definitely get involved in such acts. Therefore, the companies concerned should deliver all the safety equipment and the training to participants to overcome the chances of accidents during the event. 

Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. Do you agree or disagree?

 Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. Do you agree or disagree?

Surviving in an alien environment without knowledge of local language can pose severe hurdles in various paradigms: 

• Knowing about local customs and ways of life can become a difficult job; thus, never allowing migrants to effectively integrate with surroundings 

• Youngsters find it harder to settle down since they are unable to mingle with their native peers and often are subjected to slur 

• Finding work can become an extremely arduous job 

• Surviving in alien surroundings can be an onerous task: finding directions, knowing about places 

No issues arise today   

• Virtual interpreters can help a great deal in overcoming linguistic barriers. 

• Systems like GPS and google maps can help people find directions

• Migrants go well prepared to handle such issues and try to overcome the barriers using their intellect with enthusiasm

Settling in a society that mandates use of an alien language can indeed lead to both social and practical complications. I agree that the challenges of communication posed by differences in languages can create hurdles in everyday life and negatively impact social integration.

To commence with, the most prominent obstacle, posed by linguistic incompatibility, facing those relocating is fostering meaningful relationships with natives. Language is a crucial tool for communication, and when people cannot effectively express themselves in the local dialect, they can become vulnerable to social isolation. For instance, immigrants may struggle to participate in community events, espouse cultural subtleties, or even engage in casual conversations with neighbors, or colleagues. This can result in feelings of alienation and hinder the process of social integration, making it difficult for individuals to gain a sense of belongingness.

Furthermore, negotiating everyday regimes can be severely impeded. Inability to comprehend official documents, follow instructions, or seek assistance can engender significant hurdles. For example, navigating effectively through public services: healthcare or transportation, can become a steep challenge when important information cannot be fully absorbed. Similarly, engaging with legal systems, managing financial affairs, and even shopping for basic necessities can be problematic if the individual is unfamiliar with the local language. Additionally, the language gap can impact professional opportunities. Those unable to communicate effectively using the host  tongue, may face limited career prospects, or struggle to advance in their fields. Miscommunication in the workplace can become frequent, affecting productivity, collaboration, and team dynamics. 

In conclusion, surviving in alien surroundings that stipulate use of unfamiliar linguistic skills can be a herculean task. While it is possible to surmount these obstacles through language learning and adaptation, the initial difficulties can be profound and far-reaching, affecting both personal and professional aspects.

Some people argue that all experimentation on animals is bad and should be outlawed. However, others believe that important scientific discoveries can be made from animal experiments. Can experimentation on animals be justified? Are there any alternatives?

 Some people argue that all experimentation on animals is bad and should be outlawed. However, others believe that important scientific discoveries can be made from animal experiments. Can experimentation on animals be justified? Are there any alternatives?

Justified. Why? 

• The clinical trials conducted on animals has allowed us to ensure that the products and procedures are safe for human consumption. 
• Many medicines and surgical processes perfected have helped save billions of lives   
• Humans being deemed as superior creatures cannot be used as subjects
• None,  the pharma companies, would want lawsuits on them 
• The creatures being used for tests are not exotic and are otherwise also killed in huge numbers every year as they  considered as pests 

Not. Yes? 

• Humans have not created animals but nature, so they do not have right to inflict poor on the poor beings  

Alternatives 

• Human tissue cloning has earned earned some success and the new products can be tried on those. 

The debate surrounding conducting clinical trials on animals is the most heated in the healthcare and cosmetics sectors. While this practice is deemed as acceptable, some raise concerns, which though can be overlooked in the favor of public good at large. 

Discovery of numerous vaccines, medicines, surgical procedures, and so on, requires a trial on living beings in order to determine their impact on physiological functions, and outcomes, so it is justified to experiment on animals, as without this, medicines, procedure, or even cosmetics cannot be deemed fit for human consumption. Several ailments inflicting kidney, brain and heart, and terminal illnesses: cancer, facing humans have been treated using remedies and procedures perfected through this arrangement, saving  billions of lives that  would have been lost to preventable disease.

Moreover, there is little room for objections regarding these settings; the fauna used to carry out research is not exotic, or nearing extinction, but those such as monkeys and rodents that are considered to be a menace, and culled in millions by farmers, animal control boards and other agencies  through either poisoning or being shot. 

As far as  exploring alternatives is concerned, there are few alternatives, except using cloned human tissue to evaluate the effectiveness of  medical intervention on humans, which is yet to prove its credentials by virtue of being in its rudimentary stage, and needs more research to realise its potential. However, till then the  invaluable human life cannot be left at its own device to fend for itself against ailments and diseases. 

Overall, objections raised by the critics of animal testing fail to hold  ground in the face of the need to provide effective safeguards against illnesses, infections and disabilities, and medical conditions. This must continue until a potent alternative to this system is discovered. 

In many parts of the world, the proportion of older people is increasing. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages for society?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 In many parts of the world, the proportion of older people is increasing. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages for society?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 

Many argue that the higher percentage of elderly in demographic composition has numerous benefits and pitfalls associated with it, and the upcoming essay shall analyse whether  the former overwhelms the latter.

To begin with, those rallying this notion, profess that an ascending population of senior citizens could help reduce crime rate. Many police reports around the world agree that cities with more older inhabitants show eighty percent less unlawful activities than those having more young populace, since the they are not in the condition to participate in these endeavors; most of them are suffering from different health issues like difficulty in walking, dementia, and so on.  

Having said that, such demographic composition creates an immense burden on society and government, as the number of retired individuals grows, public spending on healthcare, pension, and many more increases dramatically. This inclination puts immense pressure on the young tax payers; they are only one who are contributing towards these endeavors. Additionally, a country experiencing this phenomenon suffers from slowing economic growth. A recent study by Hikasho Miniyaki suggests that the economy of Japan is already suffering due to this, with more old populace there are less number of people contributing towards financial endeavors, innovations, employment, and so forth, and if this continue in the next fifteen years economic growth is going to fall by twenty five percent.  

In hindsight, the advantages of those in their twilight years dominating population composition offers few  benefits, the  shortcomings far outstrip them: this phenomenon is likely to generate huge pressure on the young taxpayers, as well as it leads to slow economic growth of the country.