Physical education and sport should be compulsory for all students in all schools. Do you agree or disagree?

Physical education and sport should be compulsory for all students in all schools. Do you agree or disagree?

Most countries across the globe are witnessing a decline in physical fitness in school aged children, which evokes a proposal that participation in sports and physical education should be mandatory at school. I completely concur/accede/I am in favor of /inclined with this practice, and in this essay will put forth my views.

To embark on the discussion, the support for this suggestion finds its support in the benefits fetched by physical endeavors: sports acts as a medium for the learners to destress themselves by earning a healthy escape, from mundane, and a distraction from an overwhelming academic regime, enabling them to metabolize their stress harmlessly. Moreover, skills like team spirit, tackling failure and success, and so on,  which act as the cornerstone for a successful adult life, are inculcated right from childhood. Similarly, this can bolster necessary mental and motor skills: hand-eye coordination, fine motor movements and concentration, to name a few. 

On top of that, in current times, surfeit indulgence in computers and technology is depriving youngsters of opportunities to engage in physical activities, thereby exposing them to obesity and related diseases, all this can be prevented when engaged in exertional sports activities. Additionally, it is often noticed some students have more inclination towards physical activity, they tend to perform well in them, and can take it up as a profession in future. Besides this, formal tuitions are responsible for overall development as well as physical and mental well being, so this undertaking should be integrated in school.

To sum up, schooling  should, besides delivering academic knowhow, should also mandatorily integrate physical education in the formal curriculum. Active participation will make children fit and help them learn important life skills, ensuring a safe and healthy future generation.

Multicultural society brings more benefits to the country than drawbacks. In what extent do you agree or disagree?

 Multicultural society brings more benefits to the country than drawbacks. In what extent do you agree or disagree?

A faction of society believes that diverse cultures are the cornerstone of a vibrant nation engendering multifaceted upsides, while some cite umpteen pitfalls of this. This essay shall delve deeper into both viewpoints and draw a plausible conclusion.

To begin with, cultural diversity fosters enrichment and understanding within a nation. When individuals from varied cultural backgrounds interact, and share their traditions, languages, and customs, it cultivates a climate of tolerance and respect, facilitating dialogue and appreciation, thereby contributing to the development of a harmonious and inclusive society. Furthermore, it strengthens social cohesion and national unity. By celebrating diversity and promoting equal opportunities for all citizens, societies can mitigate social tensions and foster a sense of belongingness to reinforce values and principles of cohabitation.

Moreover, cross-cultural practices serve as a catalyst for innovation and economic prosperity. The populace comprising diverse ethnicities contribute with their diverse perspectives, skills, and talents, which inject dynamism into the workforce and drive entrepreneurship. By fostering this variety and inclusion, societies are better equipped to adapt to rapid changes in the global economy - enhancing competitiveness and productivity.

While detractors of multiculturalism may argue that it can lead to social fragmentation or conflicts, empirical evidence suggests otherwise: studies have consistently shown that countries with diverse populations tend to exhibit higher levels of innovation, economic growth, and social cohesion.

In conclusion, the advantages of a multicultural society, including cultural enrichment, economic prosperity, and social cohesion, far outweigh any potential drawbacks. By embracing diversity and promoting bonhomie, nations can harness the full potential of multiculturalism to build stronger, more vibrant communities in an interconnected world.

Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians. What are the reasons for this? Is it a positive or negative development?

Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians. What are the reasons for this? Is it a positive or negative development?

The emoluments of accomplished personalities in entertainment, sports and so on, exceed that of policymakers. This dissimilarity stems from umpteen grounds, but it nonetheless an effulgent side, and is likely to impact social environment favorably.  

This imbalance springs from the variations in the sources of income: where those working in media, sports and art, to name a few, have multiple venues from where they obtain financial receipts, lawmakers only have a wages from the state to boast of. To corroborate, actors, players and musicians, apart from earning astronomically from their primary occupations, gain high paying engagements, in the form of assignments for advertisements, endorsements, and as brand ambassadors, of renowned consumer good brands; and invites to extravaganzas, pageants and events, raising their remuneration manifolds, while elected representatives only get monthly salaries, besides some additional perks.

This sharpening gap in the earnings might deepen prove to deleterious by engendering craving among the lawmakers, as some allege despite their view being misplaced, to discover ways to blur this gap, and eventually, resort to unlawful and unfair practices, resulting in scandals with public money being siphoned off to fill the personal coffers.

Nonetheless, the scepticism is overwhelmed by rich dividends this phenomenon is likely to fetch: it will leave only serious contenders in the fray as those influenced by the glare of riches will join occupations in the entertainment and sports, while those willing to devote their life for the ameliorating social environment, without expecting sumptuous financial dividends in reciprocation, will embrace politics as a selfless endeavour.    

In hindsight, the disparity in compensation of celebrated entertainers and sports personalities and policymakers is driven by multitude of openings one has at their disposal, but notwithstanding the cynicism being elicited, it is bound to bring in devoted individuals into governance.   

This gap, despite proving to be rewarding, in terms of inspiring youth to work hard to gain such status, is likely to prove to be deleterious in the long run; it is going to become hard to persuade intelligent and dedicated youngsters to enter into social service, and work for betterment of society by becoming a part of governance, leaving only mediocre talent to lead the nation.

Nowadays many people want to buy famous brands of clothes, cars and other items. What are the reasons for this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

 Nowadays many people want to buy famous brands of clothes, cars and other items. What are the reasons for this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

In contemporary times, the pervasive trend of investing into the merchandise of reputed brands has seen a significant rise. In this essay, I shall delve into the key reasons behind this propensity and explain why it is a detrimental evolution.  

The primary driver of this inclination is the perceived high quality and durability: renowned brands often produce goods with excellent finish that exhibit craftsmanship. Furthermore, possession of such products is generally deemed as a symbol of affluence that simultaneously fetches social validation. Similarly, there is a drastic increase in disposable incomes, leading to increment in  spending capacity and aiding people in choosing from a plethora of high priced options available to them. Moreover, the media plays an integral role in engendering cravings for luxurious lifestyles. 

The only positive attribute this phenomenon has is that it offers a life of exclusivity when one is driving a luxurious car;  carrying an exclusive handbag; or wearing a branded attire; however, it is fraught (shrouded) with severe ramifications  as the havoc it is wreaking in the lives is irrecoverable. The constant exposure of these merchandise by celebrities entices the youth to go on a buying spree and become spendthrift. 

Additionally, there is a wasteful expenditure of resources causing an excessive financial crisis as the majority have started taking loans in order to  fulfill their desires - the emphasis on brand image and materialism taking precedence. Instead of creating an image, it dampens the self esteem of users trying to ape those who populate the high end of income spectrum leaving them distraught. 

Thus, it is crucial that the allure of famous brands in modern consumer culture must be seen with a critical eye;the benefits earned are short-termed but the accompanying circumstances cause people to endure hardships and crises. 

The government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to decrease the violent crimes in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to decrease the violent crimes in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is a prevalent belief that unlawful acts of violent nature stem from brutality showcased in motion films and television programs; thus, to help impede such phenomenon the content in these media should be strictly regulated. This essay shall examine the relevance of this statement in the following paragraphs, and emanate a substantiated conclusion. 

At the outset, the support for this proposal is founded on the assumption( presupposition/postulation/presumption/hypothesis) that cruelty is highly glamorised and tends to impact viewers, especially the young, as it gives a food for thought and persuades individuals to emulate such criminal endeavors. This lobby is often seen citing sporadic cases that followed famous Netflix series like Money Heist. This program was blamed for an increment in incidents  all across the world mimicking similar ideas of savagery, heightening criminal activities. Nevertheless, the producers overtly claimed that the inspiration for this soap opera was drawn from real incidents that took place in various cities of the USA.

However, the opponents of this notion fail to concur as they feel that the audience must not be deprived of a particular genre. They assert that the audience, regardless of their age in contemporary times, have a mind of their own, and will not accept something that does not appeal to them. They rarely blur the boundaries between the reel and real life. Movies and tele-series prove to be a mere source of entertainment and do not coax anyone to resort to illegal acts showcasing blood and gore. 

Therefore, the suggestion that the cinematic industry promulgates violence and should be barred from presenting such content can be vehemently questioned and debunked; the audience is smart enough to differentiate between what is happening on screen and the impact of such undertakings in real life.

Some people think it is better to educate boys and girls in separate schools and others feel they benefit more from attending mixed schools. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some people think it is better to educate boys and girls in separate schools and others feel they benefit more from attending mixed schools. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

 Education plays a very important role in life, schooling thereof being of more critical importance. Some believe letting both genders attend separate schools fetch more benefits while others contradict the view. Both have apt justifications for their opinions.

The lobby advocating mixed schooling says that, in tune with the contemporary era where gender equality is much talked about, attending same schools is of great advantage as imparting same set of instructions and teaching and making them face same challenges not only prepares both genders for professional life where both walk at the same pace but also enables a better understanding as they would not consider the other inferior or superior.

Moreover, letting both sexes enjoy learning in the same facility is beneficial to the economy on the whole as setting up an entirely new establishment involves huge costs in terms of salaries, maintenance etc, which when saved can be utilized for other needs of society. For instance, money saved on setting up new entities can be wisely used to provide other social causes like hospitals, better roads etc.

Nevertheless, those vouching for separate schools opine that educating both in gender specific formal tuition enables better learning as the students can focus more on studies as there are less possibilities of distractions due to absence to other sex. Also, some claim that there have been instances where girls find it problematic to put queries in the class due to the presence of boys as the latter are rowdy by nature and cause problems.

In hindsight, the benefits of separate schooling, although should be given due consideration, are outweighed by the advantages the mixed schooling can render. Thus, in my opinion, the students undoubtedly gain more when they are made to receive education under the same roof.

In some countries children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough. What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message?

In some countries children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough. What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message? 

Across the globe, young ones are advised that there is nothing that is an uphill task, every challenge is attainable ,by virtue of their endeavors. Many feel that passing such information has many benefits, while others refute this notion asserting that it has drawbacks too/ this is laden with drawbacks .

This positive entrenchment lays a plinth which brings out ample of enriching qualities in an individual. This aids fostering the traits like perseverance, an unswerving determination which encourages them to attempt overcoming any kind of adversity or to face any gauntlet. Further, this allows them to be more creative and sharpen their innate skills, analysing and constructing the suitable strategies. Such a young populace develops confidence and has enthusiasm to pursue their goals. Besides this, it assists the community greatly as the young generation is adequately prepared to encounter hardships with their efforts rather than being dependent on their destiny .

Having said that, there is a critical assessment of such education, it can pose many impediments as there is a fine line between firm resolve and madness/eccentricity and this may turn many stubborn, reluctant and unprepared to listen. Moreover, some act as if they are possessed and keep on moving on a path mindlessly, without even appreciating their aptitude. Such a scenario may lead to stress and many other mental afflictions as youngsters may pursue such aims that are beyond their resources, resulting in only unprecedented sufferings.

In hindsight , it is true that toil paves the way to a successful life and juveniles should be trained to slog for goals; however, it is of paramount importance that the viability of aims should be considered before acting robotically and to avoid wild goose chase.

In some countries university students live at home with their family while they study, whereas in other countries students attend university in another city.Do you think the benefits of living away from home during university outweigh the disadvantages?

In some countries university students live at home with their family while they study, whereas in other countries students attend university in another city.Do you think the benefits of living away from home during university outweigh the disadvantages?

In modern times, it is often observed that learners have to move out of their homes for higher studies, and it is the most pivotal decision of their life. I opine this arrangement brings numerous benefits that easily exceed its drawbacks.

To begin with, when one moves out of the home to embark upon an academic journey, it is overwhelming initially in terms of: financial burden, living alone, facing lack of support, finding it onerous to manage the time, and suffering psychological impact, and so on. This can lead to home sickness, taking an emotional toll on the well being of the young ones, precipitating distraction from studies, causing frequent absenteeism from classes. Likewise, often to cope with this stress, many become prone to going astray, and picking up unacceptable habits: drinking and drug abuse, to name a few.  

However, despite having certain shortfalls,  shifting to another location offers umpteen incomparable benefits: those surviving independently foster a sense of autonomy, learn to carry out daily activities, without external intervention, while managing studies. Similarly, the new area and peers - hailing from varied cultures and places - helps enhance their understanding and appreciation of diversity. These skills are essential for the progress on the personal and professional front as these independent interactions add to overall development. Another farfetched positive aspect of this setting is a heightening of confidence, problem solving skills, as one is subjected to a roller-coaster ride on various occasions. These experiences are vital for holistic development as an independent personality.

Overall, although living away from family for education is fraught with complications: financial and emotional, these cannot surpass the favorable factors  that buttress personal growth and broadens horizons, typical integral features of university life.

More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending time in communities in poorer countries doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses.

More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending time in communities in poorer countries doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses. Why is this? Who benefits more from this, the communities or these young people?

Today, youth from prosperous parts of the world are motivated to volunteer in poverty-stricken regions due to various reasons. Such an evolution is proving to be a win-win situation for all the parties involved. 

The primary cause that is stimulating the young generation of elite countries to rise to the occasion and served the impoverished is the advent of globalization, by virtue of which youngsters feel that  it is their moral responsibility to lend a hand to help mitigate miseries of the deprived so that the latter can also lead a comfortable life. Moreover, their adventurous spirit and an intent to do something new is acting as a driving force, making them transcend geographical, political and socio-economic barriers. 

Undertaking such endeavors is turning out to be extensively favourable for youngsters: they are able to learn about the problems faced by those surviving in poor economic conditions and the ways to alleviate those afflictions; and forge relationships  with people from other parts of the world, strengthening a feeling of homogeneity and empathy towards others. 

Similarly,  societies, both recipient and donors are able derive sumptuous advantages. Where the former can use the expertise, otherwise absent due to lack of education in such societies, to deploy in various strategic sectors and create venues for development, the latter affords an opportunity to enrich its skill pool with the talent that is capable of performing even in daunting conditions, absence of resources and presence of numerous impediments such as social, cultural and legal.

Overall,  this phenomenon is driven globalization and a sense of adventure, but the benefits it is fetching are innumerable; where youngsters gain in-depth knowledge about the problems faced by the third world, the global society is rendered with the workforce that can operate under any conditions.

In hindsight, this newly emerging phenomenon has, although taken everyone by surprise, it is nonetheless deemed as reassuring that renders guarantee for closer cooperation between different countries. Similarly, the young and societies on both sides receive humongous rewards. 

Some people think it is better for children to grow up in the city, while others think that life in the countryside is more suitable. Discuss.

Some people think it is better for children to grow up in the city, while others think that life in the countryside is more suitable. Discuss.

There is a prevalent belief that the ideal environment for rearing children is the urban surroundings, while several others have the perception that villages may prove to be beneficial. This notion evokes mixed responses and needs to be critically analyzed before arriving at a plausible conclusion.

A significant faction believes that urban locales help broaden the horizons of young individuals while they are growing up as they afford access to quality education: good schools, libraries, universities  and other resources. Furthermore, as they grow up, they receive surfeit opportunities for employment -  these locations are abounding with myriads of industries and happen to be the economic powerhouse - fetching enhanced quality of life. Moreover, urban areas have people from diverse cultural backgrounds that aids in fostering experiences of  several individuals leading to broader perspectives and a better worldview.  Also, young urbanites enjoy the advantage of exploring a wide array of leisure activities such as sports complexes, music academies and so on, assisting them in cultivating hobbies and discovering their creative persona.

  

However, as per the other school of thought when youngsters spend their childhood in a rural environment, they learn to embrace nature and its bounties. This can prove to render health benefits and instill a sense of tranquility in them. Besides this, young ruralites residing have a strong sense of community hardwired into them owing to lack of population and a close and regular contact between the neighbours and other inhabitants, teaching them about helping each other and cohabiting harmoniously.

   

Therefore, both the opinions hinge on plausible justifications, and I believe that both the environments have distinct pros to offer. Thus, it is  the individual prerogative where one wants to bring their progeny up.   

In many countries today, crime novels and TV crime dramas are becoming more and more popular. Why do you think these books and TV shows are popular? What is your opinion of crime fiction and TV crime dramas?

In many countries today, crime novels and TV crime dramas are becoming more and more popular. Why do you think these books and TV shows are popular? What is your opinion of crime fiction and TV crime dramas?

Crime-based fiction and non-fiction narratives, in printed versions and audio-visual presentations, have been gaining favors from more and more. This can be attributed to several causes, and has variable effects on the audience. 

To commence with, the primary driver of this craving is the innate animal instincts that persuade one to access the content that portrays violence, anti-social acts and sufferings of victims, thereby letting some experience happiness in perversion and others express sympathy at the plight of sufferers. Similarly, the suspense created by this kind of literature, soap operas and documentaries, tend to make readers and viewers curious, making them go for more. Moreover, many find novels and television series of this type quite fascinating as the plots challenge their investigative skills and bring detectives out of them. 

This phenomenon allows the followers of this style of stories and audio-visual showcasing to familiarize with the misery of the affected and ruthlessness of perpetrators without actually breaking the law themselves. Likewise, a majority reports that they are able to enlighten themselves about the threats and dangers lurking around them, and embrace appropriate precautions as safeguards against incidence of unlawful and illegal endeavors. 

However, there is a darker side to this propensity: a general fear is expressed about drawing inspiration from such portrayals in books and on television, and emulating them in real life; especially youngsters are the most vulnerable group who are likely to reenact what they read and see, and their surroundings even though these utterances have little factual evidence in support.  

Overall, the spirit of inquiry, the inherited biological traits, and profound desire to inform oneself about the jeopardies that could adversely affect the safety, have helped sustain the popularity of this genre; and in a way, this has positively impacted society.  

In some countries university students live at home with their family while they study, whereas in other countries students attend university in another city.Do you think the benefits of living away from home during university outweigh the disadvantages?

 In some countries university students live at home with their family while they study, whereas in other countries students attend university in another city.Do you think the benefits of living away from home during university outweigh the disadvantages?

Even though this arrangement carries umpteen benefits, it is hard to overlook its pitfalls; however, it does evoke a controversy whether the former eclipse its failings.  

In modern times, it is often observed that learners have to move out of their homes for higher studies, and it is the most pivotal decision of their life. I opine this arrangement brings numerous benefits that easily exceed its drawbacks.

To begin with, when one moves out of the home to embark upon an academic journey, it is overwhelming initially in terms of: financial burden, living alone, facing lack of support, finding it onerous to manage the time, and suffering psychological impact, and so on. This can lead to home sickness, taking an emotional toll on the well being of the young ones, precipitating distraction from studies, causing frequent absenteeism from classes. Likewise, often to cope with this stress, many become prone to going astray, and picking up unacceptable habits: drinking and drug abuse, to name a few.  

However, despite having certain shortfalls,  shifting to another location offers umpteen incomparable benefits: those surviving independently foster a sense of autonomy, learn to carry out daily activities, without external intervention, while managing studies. Similarly, the new area and peers - hailing from varied cultures and places - helps enhance their understanding and appreciation of diversity. These skills are essential for the progress on the personal and professional front as these independent interactions add to overall development. Another farfetched positive aspect of this setting is a heightening of confidence, problem solving skills, as one is subjected to a roller-coaster ride on various occasions. These experiences are vital for holistic development as an independent personality.

Overall, although living away from family for education is fraught with complications: financial and emotional, these cannot surpass the favorable factors  that buttress personal growth and broadens horizons, typical integral features of university life.

Many people think that every individual is responsible for their own healthy lifestyle, others believe that governments should take care of it. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Many people think that every individual is responsible for their own healthy lifestyle, others believe that governments should take care of it. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Modern times are witnessing poor lifestyle choices rising, persuading a debate that measures should be embraced to ensure well being, but who should take the onus of this. While some suggest that one should take the ownership in this case, others feel that the state should handle this.  

 

Those in favor of governments donning the mantle for safeguarding public health  feel that it is its duty since it has resources and expertise to deal with a task of such monumental dimensions. Individuals are bereft of knowledge of how to negotiate the challenge of sustaining their well being owing to their overwhelming professional engagements, and have little time to seek mediums to enlighten themselves, by the politicians have all the mediums and motives to do so, such as    imposing heavy taxes on unhealthy food products consumers; offering subsidies on nutritional food; enforcing food labeling on products; and by enlightening about healthy options, to name a few. 

Nevertheless, proponents of the individuals looking after their wellness propound that motivation to live a healthy life pattern should be personal, so that they can decide upon themselves which path they want to follow, as it is a matter of autonomy. Adding to this, everyone is aware of the choices they make and it is all dependent on their preferences and circumstances, and they are equipped with the knowledge of what health consequences it will lead to in future. Numerous studies revealed that, if there one can never be forced to follow a regime unless they  are convinced: it will fetch little yield.

Overall, self affirmation is the essential criteria for leading  a healthy lifestyle. The state can only support certain acts like campaigns and create public awareness, nonetheless the onus rests on people to follow, or not to follow. 

Global warming is one of the biggest threats humans face in the 21st Century and sea levels are continuing to rise at alarming rates. What problems are associated with this and what are some possible solutions.

Global warming is one of the biggest threats humans face in the 21st century and sea levels are continuing to rise at alarming rates.

What problems are associated with this and what are some possible solutions. 

Human activities have caused disarray in the equilibrium of nature, giving rise to major issues; warmer atmosphere, melting of ice glaciers and thus leading to a major rise in sea levels. It has become imperative to find ways to salvage the situation.

Global rise in temperatures is a major concern for coastal populations as the rising seawater level, due to the melting of ice, has made floods more rampant, causing risk to life and property. This also is making many cities and nations, like New York, Los Angeles and SIngapore to name a few, located on coasts, vulnerable to incidence of submerging underwater. Thus, inviting major economic crisis and chaos: many would be rendered homeless and jobless, thereby, making subsistence difficult for humans. 

Moreover this phenomenon can result in extreme weather conditions such as hurricanes, tornadoes and heatwaves.  This may lead to major temperature changes in the environment as more rains and drought are likely to occur, which is a big threat for the flora and fauna, raising  the risk of spreading new diseases around the globe. These imbalances would result in major threats to drinking water, food supplies and human lives.

These issues can be addressed by nations and all governing bodies by reducing the dependency on fossil fuels and finding alternate sources to derive energy. With that major incentives should be given to industries on reducing  carbon footprints. Most importantly, halting deforestation should be allocated a major priority as this would prevent buildup of greenhouse gasses like carbon dioxide that is released after logging activity.

Hence, it is evident that humans have brought misery onto themselves in the form of this perilous situation. Thus, it is imperative that it is humans who can take remedial actions to prevent an imminent catastrophe. 

Some believe that new science related to criminal forensics should be used to look at old cases. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some believe that new science related to criminal forensics should be used to look at old cases. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Should modern methods of investigating criminal events be deployed to scrutinize past events, or not, is a matter of profound debate, and it is felt that there is a need to critically analyze this  statement. 

Those proposing this arrangement feel that incorporating modern investigative tools to delve into past cases of criminal intent could help unravel the mysteries associated with those incidents, leading to identification of the real culprits, and also uncover the circumstances under which such events occurred, clearing the air of doubt about the perpetrators. To corroborate, the-state-of-the-art methods of examining old unlawful acts have revealed that Abraham Lincoln did not die of a bullet wound, but due to the subsequent surgical procedure committed mistakenly on him.  

Similarly, this could aid in resolving the unsolved cold cases  where the lawbreakers have been at large. Since the up-to-date tools of criminal analysis use various tools: ballistics and DNA investigation, investigators may be able to reach the offenders accurately and apprehend them. This could come in as a respite for those wrongly accused for a criminal act, due to absence of concrete evidence.  

Nevertheless, those cynical of such a proposal feel that despite enthusiasm among supporters of this suggestion, such an examination might not yield desired outcomes since with times, the surroundings where a crime was committed  may have changed and those involved in such endeavors might have perished. Even if some tangible outcomes are achieved, the outcomes, convictions, and time lost cannot be returned.  

Overall, even though the critics do have a valid view, examining past criminal events with the help of newly discovered investigative mechanism can help unearth numerous mysteries associated with those crimes, and also help amass a knowledge resource. Thus, I completely subscribe to this notion.   

Most people in several countries buy second hand items nowadays instead of New things. What are the reasons for this trend? Is this a positive or negative trend?Give reasons with your experience and example in at least 250 words.

Most people in several countries buy second hand items nowadays instead of new things.  What are the reasons for this trend? Is this a positive or negative trend?Give reasons with your experience and example in at least 250 words.

Concurrent times have been witnessing a notable increment of purchasing refurbished merchandise, wherein a growing population is resorting not to buy new things. In this essay, I shall delve deeper into the causes of this and elucidate on the positive implications of this phenomenon with relevant examples.

The proposal finds its support in the assumption that the increasing popularity of this is the environmental consciousness that is sprouting, especially among the youth. A large lobby of people are becoming aware and inclined towards the concept of sustainability. Moreover, citizens are now a beacon of responsible individuals who are conscious about ecological balance.

Similarly, this practice is environmentally friendly as it reduces carbon footprint. For instance, manufacturing cars involves several processes which lead to degradation of natural resources. Thus, buying a second- hand bike proves beneficial on this account. 

Having said that, this can be perceived as a positive trend as it significantly reaps economic benefits. For instance, a student facing a financial crunch can buy a used car instead of investing in a new one and falling into a debt trap. The opponents of this proposal feel that it will create unemployment and companies will not work on enhancing the quality of their products. 

In hindsight, in my opinion, those tending to buying reconditioned products are driven by economic considerations and also, the rising awareness about protecting the planet, and despite having certain detrimental impacts, this propensity is helping drive in umpteen pros in diverse manifestations.

The best way to make the road transport of goods safer is to ask drivers to take a driving test each year. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The best way to make the road transport of goods safer is to ask drivers to take a driving test each year. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

A strong argument appears to be surfacing nowadays that drivers of goods vehicles should be made to appear for a driving test annually. However, despite offering certain benefits, this proposal lacks substance and promises chaos, and thus,  cannot be concurred with at all.

To begin with, those supporting such a law propound that the vehicles carrying material are most vulnerable to mishaps that not only jeopardize the safety of other road users and invaluable cargo but also have an adverse economic effect, by virtue of damage and delays. Therefore, this policy will help ensure that those driving goods carriers stay up-to-date about the norms mandatory for safe driving practices. 

To corroborate, a pilot study was carried out in some cities of Sweden that revealed that most lorry drivers were unaware of the changed road conditions and rules of traffic management, and appearing for such a test helped them refresh and upgrade their knowledge and switch to safe driving techniques. As per authorities, this has brought down incidence of accidents involving trucks due to human error by ten percent.

Nevertheless, the benefits derived from such implementation are overwhelmed by faolings, and is likely to cause humongous confusion. Except in a few countries, this law will create serious issues in many parts of the world, especially in poor countries since it will become necessary for the government to create separate departments and populate them with a colossal workforce raising the cost of operations. Similarly, the things will become cumbersome for drivers who instead of working will be involved in the struggle to obtain yearly certification. 

Therefore, it can be said that testing individuals operating vehicles carrying goods on a yearly basis might offer some advantages, but the inconvenience it is bound to cause is unparalleled, and thus cannot be accepted.