More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending time in communities in poorer countries doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses.

More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending time in communities in poorer countries doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses. Why is this? Who benefits more from this, the communities or these young people?

Today, youth from prosperous parts of the world are motivated to volunteer in poverty-stricken regions due to various reasons. Such an evolution is proving to be a win-win situation for all the parties involved. 

The primary cause that is stimulating the young generation of elite countries to rise to the occasion and served the impoverished is the advent of globalization, by virtue of which youngsters feel that  it is their moral responsibility to lend a hand to help mitigate miseries of the deprived so that the latter can also lead a comfortable life. Moreover, their adventurous spirit and an intent to do something new is acting as a driving force, making them transcend geographical, political and socio-economic barriers. 

Undertaking such endeavors is turning out to be extensively favourable for youngsters: they are able to learn about the problems faced by those surviving in poor economic conditions and the ways to alleviate those afflictions; and forge relationships  with people from other parts of the world, strengthening a feeling of homogeneity and empathy towards others. 

Similarly,  societies, both recipient and donors are able derive sumptuous advantages. Where the former can use the expertise, otherwise absent due to lack of education in such societies, to deploy in various strategic sectors and create venues for development, the latter affords an opportunity to enrich its skill pool with the talent that is capable of performing even in daunting conditions, absence of resources and presence of numerous impediments such as social, cultural and legal.

Overall,  this phenomenon is driven globalization and a sense of adventure, but the benefits it is fetching are innumerable; where youngsters gain in-depth knowledge about the problems faced by the third world, the global society is rendered with the workforce that can operate under any conditions.

In hindsight, this newly emerging phenomenon has, although taken everyone by surprise, it is nonetheless deemed as reassuring that renders guarantee for closer cooperation between different countries. Similarly, the young and societies on both sides receive humongous rewards. 

Some people think it is better for children to grow up in the city, while others think that life in the countryside is more suitable. Discuss.

Some people think it is better for children to grow up in the city, while others think that life in the countryside is more suitable. Discuss.

There is a prevalent belief that the ideal environment for rearing children is the urban surroundings, while several others have the perception that villages may prove to be beneficial. This notion evokes mixed responses and needs to be critically analyzed before arriving at a plausible conclusion.

A significant faction believes that urban locales help broaden the horizons of young individuals while they are growing up as they afford access to quality education: good schools, libraries, universities  and other resources. Furthermore, as they grow up, they receive surfeit opportunities for employment -  these locations are abounding with myriads of industries and happen to be the economic powerhouse - fetching enhanced quality of life. Moreover, urban areas have people from diverse cultural backgrounds that aids in fostering experiences of  several individuals leading to broader perspectives and a better worldview.  Also, young urbanites enjoy the advantage of exploring a wide array of leisure activities such as sports complexes, music academies and so on, assisting them in cultivating hobbies and discovering their creative persona.

  

However, as per the other school of thought when youngsters spend their childhood in a rural environment, they learn to embrace nature and its bounties. This can prove to render health benefits and instill a sense of tranquility in them. Besides this, young ruralites residing have a strong sense of community hardwired into them owing to lack of population and a close and regular contact between the neighbours and other inhabitants, teaching them about helping each other and cohabiting harmoniously.

   

Therefore, both the opinions hinge on plausible justifications, and I believe that both the environments have distinct pros to offer. Thus, it is  the individual prerogative where one wants to bring their progeny up.   

In many countries today, crime novels and TV crime dramas are becoming more and more popular. Why do you think these books and TV shows are popular? What is your opinion of crime fiction and TV crime dramas?

In many countries today, crime novels and TV crime dramas are becoming more and more popular. Why do you think these books and TV shows are popular? What is your opinion of crime fiction and TV crime dramas?

Crime-based fiction and non-fiction narratives, in printed versions and audio-visual presentations, have been gaining favors from more and more. This can be attributed to several causes, and has variable effects on the audience. 

To commence with, the primary driver of this craving is the innate animal instincts that persuade one to access the content that portrays violence, anti-social acts and sufferings of victims, thereby letting some experience happiness in perversion and others express sympathy at the plight of sufferers. Similarly, the suspense created by this kind of literature, soap operas and documentaries, tend to make readers and viewers curious, making them go for more. Moreover, many find novels and television series of this type quite fascinating as the plots challenge their investigative skills and bring detectives out of them. 

This phenomenon allows the followers of this style of stories and audio-visual showcasing to familiarize with the misery of the affected and ruthlessness of perpetrators without actually breaking the law themselves. Likewise, a majority reports that they are able to enlighten themselves about the threats and dangers lurking around them, and embrace appropriate precautions as safeguards against incidence of unlawful and illegal endeavors. 

However, there is a darker side to this propensity: a general fear is expressed about drawing inspiration from such portrayals in books and on television, and emulating them in real life; especially youngsters are the most vulnerable group who are likely to reenact what they read and see, and their surroundings even though these utterances have little factual evidence in support.  

Overall, the spirit of inquiry, the inherited biological traits, and profound desire to inform oneself about the jeopardies that could adversely affect the safety, have helped sustain the popularity of this genre; and in a way, this has positively impacted society.  

In some countries university students live at home with their family while they study, whereas in other countries students attend university in another city.Do you think the benefits of living away from home during university outweigh the disadvantages?

 In some countries university students live at home with their family while they study, whereas in other countries students attend university in another city.Do you think the benefits of living away from home during university outweigh the disadvantages?

Even though this arrangement carries umpteen benefits, it is hard to overlook its pitfalls; however, it does evoke a controversy whether the former eclipse its failings.  

In modern times, it is often observed that learners have to move out of their homes for higher studies, and it is the most pivotal decision of their life. I opine this arrangement brings numerous benefits that easily exceed its drawbacks.

To begin with, when one moves out of the home to embark upon an academic journey, it is overwhelming initially in terms of: financial burden, living alone, facing lack of support, finding it onerous to manage the time, and suffering psychological impact, and so on. This can lead to home sickness, taking an emotional toll on the well being of the young ones, precipitating distraction from studies, causing frequent absenteeism from classes. Likewise, often to cope with this stress, many become prone to going astray, and picking up unacceptable habits: drinking and drug abuse, to name a few.  

However, despite having certain shortfalls,  shifting to another location offers umpteen incomparable benefits: those surviving independently foster a sense of autonomy, learn to carry out daily activities, without external intervention, while managing studies. Similarly, the new area and peers - hailing from varied cultures and places - helps enhance their understanding and appreciation of diversity. These skills are essential for the progress on the personal and professional front as these independent interactions add to overall development. Another farfetched positive aspect of this setting is a heightening of confidence, problem solving skills, as one is subjected to a roller-coaster ride on various occasions. These experiences are vital for holistic development as an independent personality.

Overall, although living away from family for education is fraught with complications: financial and emotional, these cannot surpass the favorable factors  that buttress personal growth and broadens horizons, typical integral features of university life.

Many people think that every individual is responsible for their own healthy lifestyle, others believe that governments should take care of it. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Many people think that every individual is responsible for their own healthy lifestyle, others believe that governments should take care of it. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Modern times are witnessing poor lifestyle choices rising, persuading a debate that measures should be embraced to ensure well being, but who should take the onus of this. While some suggest that one should take the ownership in this case, others feel that the state should handle this.  

 

Those in favor of governments donning the mantle for safeguarding public health  feel that it is its duty since it has resources and expertise to deal with a task of such monumental dimensions. Individuals are bereft of knowledge of how to negotiate the challenge of sustaining their well being owing to their overwhelming professional engagements, and have little time to seek mediums to enlighten themselves, by the politicians have all the mediums and motives to do so, such as    imposing heavy taxes on unhealthy food products consumers; offering subsidies on nutritional food; enforcing food labeling on products; and by enlightening about healthy options, to name a few. 

Nevertheless, proponents of the individuals looking after their wellness propound that motivation to live a healthy life pattern should be personal, so that they can decide upon themselves which path they want to follow, as it is a matter of autonomy. Adding to this, everyone is aware of the choices they make and it is all dependent on their preferences and circumstances, and they are equipped with the knowledge of what health consequences it will lead to in future. Numerous studies revealed that, if there one can never be forced to follow a regime unless they  are convinced: it will fetch little yield.

Overall, self affirmation is the essential criteria for leading  a healthy lifestyle. The state can only support certain acts like campaigns and create public awareness, nonetheless the onus rests on people to follow, or not to follow. 

Global warming is one of the biggest threats humans face in the 21st Century and sea levels are continuing to rise at alarming rates. What problems are associated with this and what are some possible solutions.

Global warming is one of the biggest threats humans face in the 21st century and sea levels are continuing to rise at alarming rates.

What problems are associated with this and what are some possible solutions. 

Human activities have caused disarray in the equilibrium of nature, giving rise to major issues; warmer atmosphere, melting of ice glaciers and thus leading to a major rise in sea levels. It has become imperative to find ways to salvage the situation.

Global rise in temperatures is a major concern for coastal populations as the rising seawater level, due to the melting of ice, has made floods more rampant, causing risk to life and property. This also is making many cities and nations, like New York, Los Angeles and SIngapore to name a few, located on coasts, vulnerable to incidence of submerging underwater. Thus, inviting major economic crisis and chaos: many would be rendered homeless and jobless, thereby, making subsistence difficult for humans. 

Moreover this phenomenon can result in extreme weather conditions such as hurricanes, tornadoes and heatwaves.  This may lead to major temperature changes in the environment as more rains and drought are likely to occur, which is a big threat for the flora and fauna, raising  the risk of spreading new diseases around the globe. These imbalances would result in major threats to drinking water, food supplies and human lives.

These issues can be addressed by nations and all governing bodies by reducing the dependency on fossil fuels and finding alternate sources to derive energy. With that major incentives should be given to industries on reducing  carbon footprints. Most importantly, halting deforestation should be allocated a major priority as this would prevent buildup of greenhouse gasses like carbon dioxide that is released after logging activity.

Hence, it is evident that humans have brought misery onto themselves in the form of this perilous situation. Thus, it is imperative that it is humans who can take remedial actions to prevent an imminent catastrophe. 

Some believe that new science related to criminal forensics should be used to look at old cases. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some believe that new science related to criminal forensics should be used to look at old cases. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Should modern methods of investigating criminal events be deployed to scrutinize past events, or not, is a matter of profound debate, and it is felt that there is a need to critically analyze this  statement. 

Those proposing this arrangement feel that incorporating modern investigative tools to delve into past cases of criminal intent could help unravel the mysteries associated with those incidents, leading to identification of the real culprits, and also uncover the circumstances under which such events occurred, clearing the air of doubt about the perpetrators. To corroborate, the-state-of-the-art methods of examining old unlawful acts have revealed that Abraham Lincoln did not die of a bullet wound, but due to the subsequent surgical procedure committed mistakenly on him.  

Similarly, this could aid in resolving the unsolved cold cases  where the lawbreakers have been at large. Since the up-to-date tools of criminal analysis use various tools: ballistics and DNA investigation, investigators may be able to reach the offenders accurately and apprehend them. This could come in as a respite for those wrongly accused for a criminal act, due to absence of concrete evidence.  

Nevertheless, those cynical of such a proposal feel that despite enthusiasm among supporters of this suggestion, such an examination might not yield desired outcomes since with times, the surroundings where a crime was committed  may have changed and those involved in such endeavors might have perished. Even if some tangible outcomes are achieved, the outcomes, convictions, and time lost cannot be returned.  

Overall, even though the critics do have a valid view, examining past criminal events with the help of newly discovered investigative mechanism can help unearth numerous mysteries associated with those crimes, and also help amass a knowledge resource. Thus, I completely subscribe to this notion.   

Most people in several countries buy second hand items nowadays instead of New things. What are the reasons for this trend? Is this a positive or negative trend?Give reasons with your experience and example in at least 250 words.

Most people in several countries buy second hand items nowadays instead of new things.  What are the reasons for this trend? Is this a positive or negative trend?Give reasons with your experience and example in at least 250 words.

Concurrent times have been witnessing a notable increment of purchasing refurbished merchandise, wherein a growing population is resorting not to buy new things. In this essay, I shall delve deeper into the causes of this and elucidate on the positive implications of this phenomenon with relevant examples.

The proposal finds its support in the assumption that the increasing popularity of this is the environmental consciousness that is sprouting, especially among the youth. A large lobby of people are becoming aware and inclined towards the concept of sustainability. Moreover, citizens are now a beacon of responsible individuals who are conscious about ecological balance.

Similarly, this practice is environmentally friendly as it reduces carbon footprint. For instance, manufacturing cars involves several processes which lead to degradation of natural resources. Thus, buying a second- hand bike proves beneficial on this account. 

Having said that, this can be perceived as a positive trend as it significantly reaps economic benefits. For instance, a student facing a financial crunch can buy a used car instead of investing in a new one and falling into a debt trap. The opponents of this proposal feel that it will create unemployment and companies will not work on enhancing the quality of their products. 

In hindsight, in my opinion, those tending to buying reconditioned products are driven by economic considerations and also, the rising awareness about protecting the planet, and despite having certain detrimental impacts, this propensity is helping drive in umpteen pros in diverse manifestations.

The best way to make the road transport of goods safer is to ask drivers to take a driving test each year. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The best way to make the road transport of goods safer is to ask drivers to take a driving test each year. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

A strong argument appears to be surfacing nowadays that drivers of goods vehicles should be made to appear for a driving test annually. However, despite offering certain benefits, this proposal lacks substance and promises chaos, and thus,  cannot be concurred with at all.

To begin with, those supporting such a law propound that the vehicles carrying material are most vulnerable to mishaps that not only jeopardize the safety of other road users and invaluable cargo but also have an adverse economic effect, by virtue of damage and delays. Therefore, this policy will help ensure that those driving goods carriers stay up-to-date about the norms mandatory for safe driving practices. 

To corroborate, a pilot study was carried out in some cities of Sweden that revealed that most lorry drivers were unaware of the changed road conditions and rules of traffic management, and appearing for such a test helped them refresh and upgrade their knowledge and switch to safe driving techniques. As per authorities, this has brought down incidence of accidents involving trucks due to human error by ten percent.

Nevertheless, the benefits derived from such implementation are overwhelmed by faolings, and is likely to cause humongous confusion. Except in a few countries, this law will create serious issues in many parts of the world, especially in poor countries since it will become necessary for the government to create separate departments and populate them with a colossal workforce raising the cost of operations. Similarly, the things will become cumbersome for drivers who instead of working will be involved in the struggle to obtain yearly certification. 

Therefore, it can be said that testing individuals operating vehicles carrying goods on a yearly basis might offer some advantages, but the inconvenience it is bound to cause is unparalleled, and thus cannot be accepted. 

Some people believe advertisements are useful and informative, others says they provide wrong information which leads to rise of goods prices. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some people believe advertisements are useful and informative, others says they provide wrong information which leads to rise of goods prices. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

In contemporary times, commercials are granted paramount importance due to their ability to inform audiences quickly; however, others oppose this view and assert that this medium misleads the latter and adds up to an unnecessary cost which can be avoided. In this essay, I will elucidate both perspectives in the subsequent paragraphs. 

A prominent school of thought propounds that ads help educate the public about a new product by disseminating information about its uses and benefits, in an innovative form - deploying graphics in the form of pictures and videos - which further informs consumers about the usefulness of the promoted merchandise. There have been several specimens of adverts that actually do not only share the information about a product but also carry inputs regarding how using it can benefit people.

Moreover, one can hardly deny that advertising is a means that can penetrate any market and reach to the audience, regardless of the geographical locations and distances involved. This exposes people to new launches that they can use to afford convenience and also improve the quality of their life. For instance, publicity of lifestyle and health products have successfully enlightened millions about their possible benefits and created a demand for the same, which has forced dealers to make the same available easily.  

Nevertheless, this medium of spreading the word about a product has become a subject of indignation of critics: they bemoan the aggressive use of such a tool as it leads to augmenting of the prices of goods exponentially. It is a ubiquitous practice of hiring services of great influencers like actors, singers, and sports persons: masses blindly follow these social icons and catapult themselves into a buying spree without realizing the actual use of goods. However, the darker side of such endeavors is the costs involved in producing adverts - involving the fee of the celebrities endorsing goods, preparing material for the ads, hiring services of professionals who design and direct advertising campaigns, and above all, hiring modes where the planned publicity would feature - are colossal, which eventually will be borne  by consumers in the form of hiked prices.

Overall, after assessing both the views, I feel even though there is some substance in the view that derides the use of ads, it will be almost an uphill task to reach the targeted audience without this tool. Therefore, come what may, ads cannot be avoided and will continue to rule the roost.   

It is generally believed that the clothing and fashion industry have a big influence on people. Is this a good or a bad thing? Explain your answer using your own experience and examples where relevant.

It is generally believed that the clothing and fashion industry have a big influence on people. Is this a good or a bad thing? Explain your answer using your own experience and examples where relevant.

The tendency  of consuming goods in vogue has experienced a significant surge in recent times. This essay will scrutinise the impact of this on society at large and emanate its stand that this phenomenon is a detrimental evolution.

At the outset, the fashion industry cultivates innovations that result in a multitude of professions, including fashion designers, creative directors, fashion journalists, and so on, thereby churning out employment and professional engagement for millions. Additionally, it provides avenues for self-expression and creativity by empowering  individuals to experiment with different styles and ultimately enhance their self-esteem. Likewise, this ever- evolving industry aids in augmenting advancements in terms of technology and bolstering quality of products.

However, this trend portrays a pessimistic outlook as it leads to excessive consumption and wastage of financial resources. Those who conform to fast fashion patterns,  especially the youngsters, face economic strain due to their inclination to procure the latest merchandise. Similarly, this sector is also blamed for mindless milking of resources and leaving heaps of undesirable items that are discarded after the trend has passed. 

Additionally, this is also engendering superfluous beauty standards that often dampen the confidence of individuals, particularly of teenagers, and perpetuates body image issues.In contemporary times, social media encapsulates these changing patterns and influencers portray unrealistic trends that arouse jealousy among people. This may prove to be a daunting experience for those who wish to replicate the emerging styles, negatively impacting their mental well-being.

Therefore, in my opinion, the trendy merchandise industry exerts significant pressure on those wishing to follow trends. This is wreaking havoc in the lives of people who are gullibly entrapped and squander their hard earned money. Thus, this propensity has umpteen pitfalls and is likely to afford severe ramifications for individuals in the form of hardships and crisis.

Tourism is a modern form of colonialism. It distorts local economies, causes environmental damage and ruins the places it exploits. To what extent would you support or reject this idea?

Tourism is a modern form of colonialism. It distorts local economies, causes environmental damage and ruins the places it exploits. To what extent would you support or reject this idea?

The attitudes towards tourism being a form of imperialism are ambivalent; there are sections that affirm that this sector is bringing several accolades for the nation, while others feel it is engendering environmental issues. In this essay, I shall elucidate my stance on this matter by deliberating upon the various aspects of this industry.

At the outset, those rallying behind this notion base their rationale on the fact that tourism brings forth people from diverse cultures and ethnicities together, empowering harmony between disparate communities, and promulgating bonhomie. Moreover, in order to cater to the growing need of the industry, many professions have been founded, especially in the hospitality and transportation sector . This has seen multifold increment in the employment opportunities for the masses and bringing colossal revenue owing to the tourist developments leading to generating monetary benefits.

However, the opponents might argue that tourism leads to expanding carbon footprint and tourists act in an irresponsible manner by creating a menace by littering around and defacing places.Nevertheless, this underlying notion can be challenged as the benefits reaped from this industry are umpteen: Owing to this, invaluable foreign exchange is being generated leading to reforming economies. More and more tourist destinations are being developed, making people aware and proud of their own cultural heritage.

Therefore, it can be asserted that this industry has witnessed an unprecedented influx of tourists in the contemporary times and aids in fetching unmatched yields such as facilitating cultural exchange, development of infrastructure, and generating sumptuous revenue.

Nowadays many people are trying to earn more and more to get rich. What are the advantages and disadvantages of being rich?

Nowadays many people are trying to earn more and more to get rich. What are the advantages and disadvantages of being rich?

Wealth has always been an enticing aura, engendering a craving to afford the biggest bite of the apple of Adam, persuading; everyone is prepared to step out of their comfort zones to attain prosperity.  However, riches never arrive alone, for they bring along favors and detriments as companions, making it imperative to weigh both.    

On the effulgent side, deep pockets afford a feeling of self-sufficiency as it becomes possible to lay every imaginable facility and amenity at the disposal of family and self, one does not have to struggle to make both ends meet. Similarly, prosperity also affords a lavish lifestyle, letting one enjoy the exploits of their financial abilities procuring swanky cars, luxurious mansions, going on expensive and exotic vacations, something that others can only imagine in their dreams. 

Similarly, the wealthy are emancipated of worries about dealing with exigencies of disparate variety such as medical or other, by virtue of having enough savings by their side. In a similar manner, their tomorrow is as assured as today as they can invest into quality education of their offspring, aiding the latter in carving a bright  future, and also securing twilight years by putting money into secure investments. 

However, the thorny bushes also greet the elite in abundance since vulnerability to the criminals for extortions, ransoms, tax complications - often unleashed on them by insidious taxation laws - can predispose them to sleepless nights and inflict them with afflictions such as depression in extreme cases. Additionally, pressure to sustain the status is overwhelming, making chasing an endless mirage  imperative. 

Overall, despite fortune yielding desirable outcomes, one must be prepared to taste the sour fruit too lying embedded deep in the box. Thus, it is extremely essential to practice judiciousness suggested in annals, to enjoy riches and surmount shortcomings efficiently.     

Some people think eating meat is bad for health. Do you agree or disagree?

 Some people think eating meat is bad for health. Do you agree or disagree?

. 

As per certain health experts, meat eaters  are predisposed to several health challenges. However, this perception can be questioned on various grounds. 

The vehement lobbyists vouching for non-meat nourishment profess that those consuming non-vegetarian meals makes one vulnerable to a slew of severe health hazards - that can have an enduring impact on health, by virtue of being laden with saturated and unsaturated fats that can augment cholesterol levels and precipitate umpteen illnesses such as heart disease, liver dysfunction and even bowel cancers. Several studies have attributed a spurt in cardiac conditions in western conditions to regular eating of various flesh, especially the one derived from lamb, beef and pork. 

However, the former view is comprehensively quashed by the advocates of meat products. As per them, the fears expressed  by vegetarians hold little substance; it is not the food derived from cows, goats, or chicken, exposing people to diseases, but the sedentary lifestyles; a feature affecting even vegans in equal measures. They often cite the historical evidence of meat being a fulfilling nourishment  to counter the claims of  the latter by quoting that eskimos completely relied on meat, and sustained a robust health, until development touched them, and they adopted indolent ways of life.    

Similarly, this nourishment is a rich source of protein, iron, and vitamins: B12, and D, that are hard to derive from other options since cereals, vegetables and fruits have these in either complex form, or minuscule quantities. To corroborate, athletes in endurance sports, soldiers and those working in taxing conditions are recommended this nutrition regularly.  

In hindsight, quite contrary to the modern perception, food derived from the flesh of animals, birds and fish, is laden with abundant nutrients that if taken in sync with active lifestyle, can bolster well being.  

Some people suggest that bringing up children by the whole family including uncles, aunts and grandparents is better, rather than only by parents, but others disagree with this statement. Discuss and give your opinion and examples.

Some people suggest that bringing up children by the whole family including uncles, aunts and grandparents is better, rather than only by parents, but others disagree with this statement. Discuss and give your opinion and examples.

When it comes to comparing rearing juveniles, a fierce debate ensues: some feel this task is best done in the extended family environment; it affords umpteen favorable outcomes, whereas others strongly lean in the favor of nuclear settings.

Those advocating upbringing by the whole family propound that this allows youngsters to establish better bonds with the entire family, and ensure that they embrace a liberal view of things, making them grow more social and receptive by virtue of encountering disparate opinions from diverse age-groups - cousins, grandparents, and relatives, helping youingsters become adaptive and akin to teamwork, contributing to the decision making process: whether it is related to career or financial matters,  aiding in their well-rounded development. Likewise, owing to the presence of the entire family, youngsters face less anxious moments and  anxiety; they have a much broader resource for counseling, allowing them to cruise smoothly through hard times during studies. Also, such an arrangement eases up the burden on working parents, making parenting much easier. 

However, some sections consider mothers and  fathers as the most suitable mechanism for raising little ones: those growing up in such surroundings  develop a sense of independence in formative years, promoting self learning and doing things by oneself, making them grow to have strong mental strength. Similarly, they are less prone to any emotional stigma that any family member or relative might bring to the table. A recent study by Dr. J Potter from Toronto university further indicated that children raised by parents alone stand a much greater chance of becoming a self-made millionaire. 

Therefore, both the settings have distinct benefits to offer in their own way, and it is the individual prerogative to choose any of these environments, but the objective is to ensure a sound rearing to youngsters. 

Nowadays schools should not use textbooks because children get bored with books. Using games, computers and TV is a better way to give them new information and knowledge. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Nowadays, schools should not use textbooks because children get bored with books. Using games, computers and TV is a better way to give them new information and knowledge. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

There is a topical debate whether gadgets are better means to impart knowledge and skills to young minds, or not. Although some are skeptical while others are optimistic. Both the partisan factions cite their justified reasons in support of their opinions.

The proposal of integrating technology in classrooms and doing away with traditional means of disseminating knowledge is founded on the concurrent trend, wherein the current generation is overwhelmingly immersed in the technology-driven gadgets  in other spheres of their lives, and find books quite tedious; they have to browse through the pages to locate  information, causing disenchantment from studies. 

For instance, using ebooks affords unprecedented convenience, for they carry the facility of bookmarking, highlighting any line with various colors options, marking notes and erasing them as per convenience, to name a few, whereas the paper-based material needs one to struggle with each line and page, causing a disenchantment among youngsters.  Also, this can help prevent youngsters from taxing their tender minds to imagine things; up-to-date methods can explain all the concepts using audio-visual and animation tools, making it easier to comprehend and retain information. 

Nevertheless, the conventional methods cannot be discounted, for they teach young minds essential exploratory skills and patience, thereby allowing them to bolster their ability to assess situations without abandoning the task midway; they must read the whole chapters while looking for the relevant material.  Similarly, this also helps foster imagination, creative skills and help develop language, by forcing young minds to visualize what they are perusing and absorbing how sentences are structured appropriately. 

Overall, as technology has proliferated every walk of life, learning through computers and gadgets helps to explore more and better. Thus, I feel that imparting knowledge to learners through these means is better than deploying orthodox printed material.

Some people think that parents should teach their children about the importance of recycling, while others think it should be taught in school. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some people think that parents should teach their children about the importance of recycling, while others think it should be taught in school. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

In contemporary times, many believe it is necessary to teach youngsters about the significance of recycling. A sizable lobby feels it must be taught by parents. However, many think it should be taught in schools.  

To embark upon the discussion, parents are the role models of their wards  and the latter tend to follow their footsteps without questioning; anything the parents do is grasped immediately. Additionally, the skill cannot be developed by reading books; rather it is better learnt in a practical environment where mothers and fathers provide realistic examples to their children. Hence, many feel it is the duty of families to teach their young ones about the importance of this process. 

On the flip side, others feel that schools should be responsible to impart such knowledge. Educational institutions have adequate facilities to create an environment to provide children with any kind of skills. They can create curriculum and schedule separate periods for such activities; faculties can be assigned to teach the young ones about such a process. Moreover,formal tuition is vested with the obligation of polishing the personalities of the young individuals; in the near future, recycling is likely to become an essential part of the personalities of the rational adults and thus, it should be fostered during formative years. Moreover, young minds have the tendency to learn better in a formal environment, along with their peers where they can also grab the content clearly which is retained life long.  

In the end, I feel even though parents play an important role in educating their wards about the importance of reprocessing, formal institutions are the proper place to provide their students with such expertise; they have the expertise and resources to see this task through. 

Nowadays many people want to buy famous brands of clothes, cars and other items. What are the reasons for this. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

Nowadays many people want to buy famous brands of clothes, cars and other items. What are the reasons for this. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

More and more people are becoming inclined to consuming clothes manufactured by established and famous companies. This phenomenon is fuelled by multiple reasons, but is impacting society unfavorable 

Most are tempted into buying goods primarily due to the innate quality of humans  to emulate each other, especially the affluent and celebrated personalities who endorse through ads. This yearning is bolstered by higher disposable incomes and availability of the  merchandise designed and manufactured to address the expectations and aspirations of diverse income groups. This tendency is assumed to be making people feel up-to-date, contented with their living conditions, and eventually confident. An opinion goes to the extent of terming this inclination as a development helping bridge gaps between diverse socioeconomic groups.

Notwithstanding certain plausible advantages, this is predisposing people to several difficulties, who out of their intent to flaunt  their affluence, or match the standards of their elite peers, end up spending their hard earned money extravagantly, often exhausting their reserves, and making them vulnerable to financial crisis. The most profoundly affected group from this development is that of the youngsters who in an attempt to match possessions of their rich friends, raise unwarranted demands on their parents, and making them struggle hard to meet the demands: various studies have substantiated the fact that a major portion of household budgets is spent on buying, or maintaining prohibitively expensive goods of coveted brands, considered a luxury, leaving them with little for the rainy days.

Overall, it can be thus said, despite making people feel happy and confident, the penchant  to flaunt wealth is exposing them to financial troubles since they are unable to save money for their future. Therefore, this phenomenon is an unfavourable evolution: benefits are eclipsed by drawbacks.  

Some think that young people should be free to choose any career they like, while others say that they should think more realistically about their future. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

 Some think that young people should be free to choose any career they like, while others say that they should think more realistically about their future. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 

Selecting a profession has always been a task of paramount importance for the youth. It is often argued that they should be allowed freedom to choose an occupation according to their preference, while others think that they should be more practical and ponder about their future profoundly.

The propensity of young pursuing liberty when it comes to choosing their occupations stems from the fact that they are vulnerable to a broad range of knowledge of the things they are passionate about, making them ardent followers of the belief that seeking engagement into an endeavor that appeals to them can fetch them laurels, in the form of fame and fortune. 

Also, they can be more productive if they are allowed to choose their jobs themselves and they can contribute more effort in gaining proficiency in the field they chose, bolstering their work efficiency. Conversely, as  many suggest that  if they are pushed into something that fails to address their aspirations, they may lead an unsatisfied life confined to an unwanted domain. 

However, some argue that ‘All that glitters is not gold’: youngsters should judiciously weigh their future options; they might land up in jobs that are poorly compensated,  or they might be wedded to something that predisposes them to stagnation, making it impossible to make amendments later. They must not fall prey to the temptation of short-term prominently highlighted by employers. Hence, they must seriously do some brain storming and pondering about the future prospects before engaging professionally.    

Overall, even though  youngsters can be more productive and happy if they choose their careers themselves, they should prioritize the gains they are likely to derive in the long run from the job they take up. Striking a balance between natural inclination and long-term prospects must be struck.   

In some countries, it is illegal for employers to reject the people are applying for job because of his/her age Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

 

In some countries, it is illegal for employers to reject the people are applying for job because of his/her age.  Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

Being denied a job based on age is a quite ubiquitous practice worldover. However, some governments have come down strongly to discourage this arrangement and have laid strong fundamental rules, ensuring denying an application based on age is deemed unlawful. This although has been extolled as favorable, the set-backs it can cause to businesses cannot be overlooked. 

It is becoming exceedingly evident that organizations have been coaxed into espousing a liberal approach related to hiring people: hire personnel meeting the selection parameters based on the required skill sets, regardless of their age. This policy has opened up a big horizon for those in the post retirement age, or freshers, wanting to offer something to the world, based on their talent. This major change in the job world has led to more satisfied employees, earning them financial security. Similarly, this is helping individuals circumvent mental afflictions, and inclination to engage in crime.   

Having said that, a school of thought lambasts this policy and asserts that this can impact organizations adversely. It can lead to selection of candidates incongruous with the prerequisites of destined work, by virtue of lack of industrial experience, physical abilities, and so on, which could directly impact the performance of the organization. Many times, the consistently incrementing demand of staying up-to-date with technology has a potential to hinder the performance of aspirants short listed through this policy, impacting productivity, and consequently, the bottomline, proving to be a great disincentive to continue with their operations. Moreover, this could deprive institutions from selecting appropriately qualified and able-bodied aspirants, harming their interests in the long run. 

Overall, dispute aside, despite fetching certain benefits for the affected individuals, this edict can undermine the efficiency of employers and wrest the authority from them to hire adequately suitable workers. I feel the state, instead of enacting such statutes,  should opt for more prudent policies.  

In recent years, there has been a rise in the use of performance-enhancing drugs in sports. What are the consequences of doping for athletes? What measures should be taken to combat this issue?

In recent years, there has been a rise in the use of performance-enhancing drugs in sports. What are the consequences of doping for athletes? What measures should be taken to combat this issue?

The problem of consumption of medicines to bolster outcomes in sports by sports personnel is not new, but in contemporary times, their application has incremented manifold. However this is severely jeopardizing mental and physical wellbeing of users making it imperative to discover appropriate panacea.

The consumption of substances to perform better than the rival players has the potential to threaten physical and mental wellness in the long run. Where on the one hand, the ingredients of such illegal medications, such as anabolic steroids, can interfere with the flow of blood to the different parts of the body in order to enhance the muscle mass and the stamina, and expose those consuming such material disorders can cause fatal disorders, such as liver and kidney failure, and cardiac complications. For instance, most bodybuilders consuming protein supplements, and mass builders do not survive to live beyond forty or forty-five years because of multiple organ failure.

Similarly, long term usage can also result in unfavorable impact on the mental health as the players using these can become completely dependent on such interventions, and face issues like depression and mood swings if  they try to abandon their application since such formulations are addictive and turn the nervous system of the consumers weak.

Curtailing this practice is possible provided governments come down heavily and take strict steps like banning the players using such drugs or life, and also taking away all their privileges. Similarly, the sports practitioners must be comprehensively counseled and rehabilitated so that they can be discouraged from engaging in such illegal practices.

Overall, sports professionals using tools to help them excel in their sporting disciplines can cost them dearly, in terms of their health. Therefore, the state should adopt zero- tolerance policy for such behaviour and impose penalties.

In some countries, people are allowed to keep arms, while some people feel that private citizens should not be allowed to keep arms and ammunition as it can threaten the society and pose serious problems for public safety. Discuss and give your opinion

In some countries, people are allowed to keep arms, while some people feel that private citizens should not be allowed to keep arms and ammunition as it can threaten the society and pose serious problems for public safety. Discuss and give your opinion 

There is a great public discourse hovering around the sensitive issue of private citizens possessing guns. While some commentators propound that it is the need of the hour, and such equipment can afford appropriate safeguard against undesirable situations, others dissent with this proposal.  

To embark upon discussion, a lobby favors affording(give/extend/allow) permission for keeping guns for the sake of safety as they consider such devices as a permanent solution against unlawful elements like robbers, who not only steal their goods but also ensure deleterious effects on their lives. Moreover, those residing in areas such as city outskirts, suburbs, and those deprived of jurisdictions need to rely on self defense, making it imperative to have a hold on appropriate safeguard. 

Additionally, those dwelling within close vicinity of wild areas must acquire certain devices to deal with wild creatures, and this kind of protective equipment can help them ensure that they remain away from trouble. In a pilot study carried out by Hindustan Times, it was revealed that nearly 47% of those having agricultural land neighboring the forest regions, aided themselves with armament to help shelter their crops  from foraging deer and elephants.  

Nevertheless, as per critics, this kind of arrangement would turn out to be a fiasco, as if children get their hands on these devices, they might misuse these, and jeopardize their lives; hence firearms should not be made a lawful possession. Similarly, those having anger issues might consider using arms as the first resort instead of the last, consequently resulting in exposing others to serious harm.  

In hindsight, I opine that this practice will lead to chaos in the society as many might become vulnerable to the unwarranted outcomes if weapons are used unintentionally or in a fit of rage.

In today’s digital age, anyone with a smartphone can capture and share photographs. This accessibility to photography diminishes the value of professional photographers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 In today’s digital age, anyone with a smartphone can capture and share photographs. This accessibility to photography diminishes the value of professional photographers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays,  many feel that ease of access to smartphones with the updated camera systems has made photography effortless, leading to decline in the relevance of professionals engaged in photography. Whether, or not this notion holds substance, is a matter worth delving deeper into.

It is  generally assumed that photographers are best in their business, nonetheless the advent of state-of-the-art cameras in smartphones have dented their influence remarkably. Most hi-tech smartphones offer various modes of photography with their software: portrait, video, cinematic , panorama, and so on, turning photography into an uncomplicated task that can be also negotiated by novices too. The resources available on the internet also have become a huge asset for the ones new to taking pictures, empowering those willing to learn the art, thereby forgoing the need to hire specialist services in an event of public gathering. 

Nevertheless, many still hold a different view and argue that just taking photos and sharing them with a smartphone is not everything. Photography is an art that a professional performs with finesse and produces the outstanding results that an image or a video can have. If it were just about clicking pictures from a smartphone, why would major world events hire professionals to do the job, whether it is olympics, soccer, and theater, to name a few, everyone uses specialists to click images; they are adroit in determining the correct moments, light exposure, distance and even close-up and angles, making them stand apart from the rest, and letting their significance endure despite technological developments.   

Overall, undeniably, modern technology has  challenged the supremacy of those with specialist acumen in clicking pictures; however, I partially concur with view this since the competence of these individuals is unmatched and still enjoy domination when it comes to capturing essential moments.