Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?

Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 

Nowadays, people have to pay entrance fees for visiting some of the museums. A lobby believes that this practice has umpteen benefits, while others disagree. This essay shall elucidate both the viewpoints and try to come to a conclusion.

The most prominent benefit afforded by charging access fees is that it helps generate revenue that can be used for the maintenance and upkeep of museums, thereby reducing the government expenditure on such facilities, and indirectly benefiting the taxpayers by keeping the tax burden low. It further aids in attracting only serious connoisseurs who are keenly interested in what these places have to offer and who appreciate the value and significance of the artifacts displayed there. It also acts as a deterrent for unruly elements by preventing them from entering the premises and using it for various nefarious activities. This has been corroborated by a recent survey where the paid museums consistently ranked above free museums in terms of cleanliness and safety due to absence of crimes like pickpocketing, making it prudent for authorities to levy entry fees.

On the contrary, the critics argue that such policies dissuade curious youngsters, due to the prohibitive costs involved, from learning about the culturally and historically significant events one can glean on museum tours. It also prevents the local schools from arranging the field trips, denying the students the opportunity to expand on the knowledge gained from their curriculum. Thus, a large portion of the population is deprived of opportunities to become familiar with nostalgia, defeating the purpose for these institutions

Overall, even though there are certain pitfalls of imposing entry charges, I believe the benefits eclipse them overwhelmingly, and the former can be easily overcome by providing discounts to the target groups.

Some people believe that it is better to build new museums and town halls instead of renovating the old ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and relevant examples from your own experience.

Some people believe that it is better to build new museums and town halls instead of renovating the old ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and relevant examples from your own experience.

 

There is an intriguing debate brewing up since there is a lobby that believes construction of new tourist attractions would be of great afford rather than revamping the existing heritage sites. This essay will justify the rationale behind this notion and explore whether this is favourable or unfavourable development.

 

A slew of people takes inspiration and ideas from these historical structures about their architecture, diverse art-forms, calligraphy styles, thereby stimulating creativity and imagination among masses. If these places get replaced by modern forms, people will end up losing the significant knowhow about conventional craftsmanship. Furthermore, these sites serve as an heirloom to the future generations by rendering individuals opportunities to explore their history and getting to know numerous cultural and traditional values which are associated with them.

 

On top of that, these places happen to be major tourist attractions which lure millions of alien visitors to come and experience nostalgia associated with a city and society, which also helps generate huge revenues. If these structures are razed to the ground to give way to modern ones, the past and the value of the place will be lost forever.    

 

However, since heritage buildings are stretched over a large area, they require a great deal of maintenance and abundance of energy  to keep them illuminated owing to which the idea of refurbishing has earned support from various quarters. It is felt, it would be better to replace these structures with more energy-efficient ones, which would help in saving public funds, and the land freed from such occupation could be allocated to other indispensable purposes.

 

To reiterate, despite the garnered support for building new structures, the notion of revamping these historical sites prevail and outshine its drawbacks. Hence, I do not concur with the statement.

Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show the history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show the history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 

There is an intriguing debate brewing up since there is a lobby that believes museums and art galleries should display those artworks which represent their local culture as well as history instead of presenting exhibits from across the globe. This essay will justify the rationale behind both the notions and explore which one is agreeable.

Museums as well as art galleries tend to leave a profound impression on any spectator and play an important role in shaping their personalities. The exhibits portraying native cultural and historical significance help individuals to remain associated with their roots and render them abundant information about their past, ways of life, the ancestors, and so on.  Furthermore, these works serve as an heirloom to the future generations which motivates them to preserve and perpetuate that lineage forever.  

Moreover, demonstrating artworks of different societies from all over the world is perceived as an invasion by diverse cultures in the country by conservatives who fear that the populace might get influenced by the cultures of other nations, especially those of affluent ones,  and try to adopt them, thereby ending up losing their own cultural identity.

However, in the concurrent era, the world has become a global village posing a cut-throat competition for every individual and to face this, people need to keep themselves updated with the past events, cultures and traditions across the length and breadth of the globe to establish harmonious relations with the people of other nations.

To reiterate, despite having several affords of displaying exhibits from all over the world, the artworks having cultural and historical relevance would aid people in upholding their unique cultural identity which is imperative for any citizen of a country. Hence, I concur with the statement.

It is becoming increasingly expensive for museums to be open to the public. What would be the best solution to keep them open, in your opinion?

It is becoming increasingly expensive for museums to be open to the public. What would be the best solution to keep them open, in your opinion?

Ielts Essay Museums and Maintenance 

Museums although hold an important place in any society, escalating costs have made it hard for the authorities to maintain these places for the access of people. There are certain ways that can render a way out of this crisis. 

The most prominent of the methods to keep museums working and yet accessible to visitors is initiating a private partnership in the management. It is undeniable that commercial organizations always seek profits, this would enable optimum utilization of available resources;  thus saving money lost on account of inefficient systems. Even though many fear that may also mean a hike in the access fee,  this can be kept minimal by using the annual government grants to subsidize tickets. 

Others, however, propose more  practical ways that could help without making major changes in the management structure of these establishments: by leasing the spare spaces for private functions, social gatherings and programs, this would boost the revenues. Most of the museums are located in or near the city centers which makes them really an attractive option for social gatherings. 

Similarly, there is a lobby that vouches  for more revolutionary ways, like integrating technology, and also opening up multiple facilities in the premises of these locations.   By using interactive technology, authorities can create interesting activities that engross children and adults alike, at nominal charges that people will readily part with.  This could help rouse fascination for such places among the visitors. Besides this, opening up movie theaters that focus on films specific to the subject of the museums could also be a great way to augment revenues. 

In conclusion, I feel that private participation might not be an appropriate way out, but making these places interesting by offering interactive activities, besides rendering other facilities could do wonders.