Many people believe that today there is a general increase in anti-social behavior and lack of respect for others. What might have caused this situation? How to improve it?

 

Many people believe that today there is a general increase in anti-social behavior and lack of respect for others. What might have caused this situation? How to improve it?

 

The times are turning tumultuous with everyone losing patience and not minding causing harm to others if need arises. There are a host of causes for that can be attributed to this not so new attitude, but one needs to find ways to mitigate this situation as soon as possible.

 

Ever widening social divide, based on socioeconomic conditions, is making fault lines between the haves and have-nots surface prominently, the sum total of the consumerist society. Where the elite enjoy the exploits of the riches they have amassed, the impoverished find themselves struggling to make their both ends meet. In the contemporary times, unlike the past, when consumer attitudes rule the roost, everybody is bitten by the bug of desire of possessing every imaginable comfort, and when unable to afford, people resort to snatching by force, resulting in crimes. 

 

Moreover, simmering frustrations often give way to scornful behavior. Many today are leading a life of stress and are overwhelmed by the need to address all their obligations without complaining. This results in building up anxiety, and as tensions grow, even the slightest of provocations, cause the release of pent up stress in form of violent behavior against others that is often disrespectful.

 

Nevertheless, discovery of a viable mechanism can help reduce the disparities. Governments and social groups can play a great role in this, by helping those lacking  access to all comforts, to afford minimum subsistence. Besides this, individuals too need to strike a balance between different spheres of their lives and not let diverse realms overlap each other.

 

Hence,   timely intervention from the government, communities and individuals can surely turn the table on the adversity of such monumental dimension; however  any laxity can further exacerbate the situation and turn it into a crisis.

Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Growing incidence of disease and disorders due to use of cigarettes has prompted several eminent health experts to propose prohibiting consumption of this material in public. This has although received an overwhelming support from various quarters, some are quite annoyed at this and term it a biased resolution. 

A sizable majority rallies behind the idea of forbidding smoking when in public. Their opinion is gains support from the health vulnerabilities of those affected by the unwanted inhalation of the carbon dioxide and monoxide emanating from side stream of every puff. The hazardous ingredients contained in the fumes expose passive smokers more to lethal ailments linked to respiratory disorders and terminal diseases to name a few, than the active smokers themselves.

Moreover, the stink of smoke emanating from tobacco based products is disgusting for those not consuming such substances, causing inconvenience and unease. Many profess why they should be subjected to unpleasant experience for the sake of those obsessed to this habit. If one must fulfill their desire of getting a dose of nicotine for exciting their senses, they should do it privately rather than forcing others to undergo torment and agony of bearing the stench of tobacco. 

Nevertheless, this proposal has fetched brickbats from dedicated smokers who question the act of proscribing this practice in public domain. They feel in an era where society is surrounded by various sources, like fossil fuel based transportation mediums and industry, that ooze contaminants and  pollutants profusely why are poor minority smokers being targeted. They term it as injustice and unwarranted.  

Overall, for public good, it will be quite prudent to disallow smoking publicly, if smokers must satisfy their cravings, they should choose their private realms so that their habit does not cause harm and inconvenience to others

Due to so many young people dropping out from school, rate of unemployment is going up and it affects our society in different ways. In your opinion, how can this situation be improved?

Due to so many young people dropping out from school, rate of unemployment is going up and it affects our society in different ways. In your opinion, how can this situation be improved?

School dropout rates have been rising despite enactment of several  rules to curtail such practice, resulting in joblessness and other more intense challenges for the society. This pressing issue needs to be addressed urgently by deploying radical methods.  

A direct intervention that can turn the situation around, is creating alternative educational streams, so that the young individuals quitting schooling, due to being unable to pursue the domains that match their aptitudes, can enroll in courses which address their aspirations and expectations. This would help them advance their expertise in their desired area, complete education, and obtain employable skills. 

 Additionally, authorities must deal with lapses in the current educational framework sternly. Efforts should be made to bring back the dropouts within the folds of education by enacting a system of entrance examinations, to facilitate entry into the higher educational institutions, which gauge the abilities of learners rather than drawing lines based on past academic accomplishments. This will help renew the interest of the young individuals in continuing with their education.

Similarly, a visionary approach might help in stemming this ever worsening trend: making education more adaptive and interactive instead of continuing with the obsolete arrangement of imparting lessons, using books and worksheets, which generally cause a great disenchantment among young minds. A generation completely immersed and influenced by technology in their other walks of life is least inclined pursue academic dreams with century old methods: they are rarely able to  make connection between booking knowledge and practical applications of interactive technology that fascinates them with more complex challenges.   

Hence, I feel the current educational framework needs to be revamped and be made  more adaptive to address the challenges facing the society today or which may surface later. It is impossible to walk forward while looking backwards

More and more wild animals are on the verge of extinction and others are on the endangered list. What are the reasons for this? what can be done to solve this problem?

More and more wild animals are on the verge of extinction and others are on the endangered list. What are the reasons for this? what can be done to solve this problem?

Day by day the population of exotic species is declining as some of them are on the verge of getting extinct, while many have already been termed as endangered. The reasons behind promoting such a situation are multidimensional. But, solutions do exist to surmount this problem.

Human intervention in biodiversity is growing rapidly at a global level to fulfill various needs and demands of society. Such an intrusion of humans is causing deforestation and exploitation of natural flora and fauna. It is because of this, the surroundings of the forest are getting hampered: creating an unfavorable environment for some wild species, making sustenance for long enough harder; thus, leading to their extinction. Such drastic change causes disturbance in the food web that further exacerbates the problem for other species to continue their survival in absence of availability of food. Therefore, causing exotic flora and fauna to struggle hard for survival while their count keeps reducing.

However, to overcome this challenge, authorities must prohibit human activities of any kind in and around the pristine locations, so that any form of threat to wild species can be eliminated. In addition, several conservation programs and sites such as sanctuaries and botanical gardens must be established that can be used not only for the breeding of engendered species but also treating them. Such arrangements will aid in reviving the number of endangered species and may be able to restore the lost heritage of wild kingdom by performing research and simulating the environment required by those species

Hence, I am of the belief that conservation of wild animals is the need of the hour and if action is not taken now then it will be too late to take a call for their survival.

Scientists believe that the world is in danger due to environmental changes. Some people say that personal lifestyle changes should be made to reduce the damage to environment, while others think that the government should do something to help. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

 Scientists believe that the world is in danger due to environmental changes. Some people say that personal lifestyle changes should be made to reduce the damage to environment, while others think that the government should do something to help. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

With calls for taking steps to protect the environment becoming shriller, many have started discussing how to go about it. This has helped surface two disparate opinions, one that lays the onus on individuals to take the initiative and transform themselves, the other that suggests intervention from the state.

Individual citizens are the ones who create all the environmental damage with their unpalatable ways of life. They are the ones who are buying more and more cars, and driving frequently and in the process burning fossil fuels that is resulting in air pollution. If the citizens took a step forward and minimized their reliance on private conveyance and switched to public transport, it help nip the evil in its bud.

Moreover, undeniably individuals being the basic unit of the society, influence their  surroundings profoundly. Small steps taken by them, like resorting to minimal consumption, limiting the quantity they buy; recycling material instead of dumping them mindlessly; promoting greenery at their own initiative, like planting trees in the surroundings, can establish precedents for others to follow. This will improve things automatically and help reverse the damage to the environment.

Nevertheless, the state with its juggernaut of jurisdiction, authority and  access to abundant resources is perceived, by many, as a fit establishment to address the uphill challenge  of restoring ecological balance. They enjoy a wider reach, over the whole nation, and the populace generally follows their edicts without questions. Moreover, policy makers can also initiate various  programs carrying out research into finding eco-friendly methods and technologies to mitigate  damage to the planet.

Overall, I strongly feel although people should and can play an active role in the endeavor of keeping their surroundings life friendly, the state should also step in to support such undertakings to guarantee success

Some people prefer to help by making donations to local charities while some prefer to donate to national & international organizations. Discuss both measures and give your opinion

 

Some people prefer to help by making donations to local charities while some prefer to donate to national & international organizations. Discuss both measures and give your opinion

 

Today, altruism seems to be in vogue with many engaging themselves in activities to help the have-nots, but a question has intrigued many, whether is it good to offer resources to a local philanthropic organization, or to go for one that addresses a much wider audience, at national or transnational level.  

 

Many favor contributing to agencies working  locally, for they consider transparency to be of paramount importance. Whatever such organizations do is conspicuous, and the impact can be felt directly without seeking any external intervention of any written reports. The recipients of assistance can be seen drawing benefits by the donors, whereas this factor is missing if one puts their resources into an establishment that functions in  much larger areas. One cannot get to know about the fate of their money.

Similarly, others talk about optimum use of their contributed resources, and avoiding unnecessary expenditure by charities working for local causes. Such institutions enjoy direct approach to benefactors, and rarely need to publicize their work, or hire services of celebrities for promotion, unlike those bodies functioning in diverse geographies.

 

However, some vouch for funding humanitarian aid organizations that target much wider locations. They feel, in the current world order, one can hardly stay oblivious to plight of their fellow humans, residing in far flung areas who would otherwise be unreachable, and abandoned to  suffer, were these agencies not helping mitigate challenges by rendering relief. Thus, one needs to work with such entities  aiming at global causes to make the world a better place.

 

Overall, I infer engaging in humane activities, carried and executed in any form, should be the principal objective  rather than sparring over which medium is superior to other. Contributions made for local and broader causes have only one goal, helping the destitute.

 

 

The most effective way to solve traffic and transport problems in the cities is to encourage people from suburbs or the countryside to live in the cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The most effective way to solve traffic and transport problems in the cities is to encourage people from suburbs or the countryside to live in the cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 

Will shifting the population from the country and outer-fringes of the cities to the urban locations help in easing up the predicament of high traffic density, and challenges faced in transportation. Many have hailed this proposal, others deride it and term it as impractical.  

Many advocate implementing this idea and feel it could bring a sea change in  the way people live in urban societies. This view is primarily based on the assumption that the majority of motorists and public modes of transit that ply / use the city roads hail from areas lying outside the municipal limits of the urban locations. Those  entering and leaving the cities must brave long travel and distance every day. If these people were made to dwell in the same urban locations, they would be spared of covering long distances every day. Also, many may feel encouraged to switch to public modes of transit like buses and metro trains if their homes and workplaces lie in close proximity to each other. This would surely help in thinning the traffic.   

 
Having said that, the ground realities of the urban settings and the traffic issues these areas face are far more complicated than this idea proposes, which is too simplistic. On delving deeper into the migration of urbanites to the outskirts and distant locations, one can easily arrive at the conclusion that the source of this outward movement has been the intense congestion caused by the dense in-city traffic, due to which the vehicles roll at a snail’s pace. So how could shifting people back into the cities help surmount this challenge. 

 Hence, this proposal lacks substance and will create chaos instead of fetching a long term mechanism to resolve the mess that plagues urban life, the unbearable yet in-escapable traffic snarls that urbanites encounter on a daily basis. 

The most effective way to solve traffic and transport problems in the cities is to encourage people from suburbs or the countryside to live in the cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The most effective way to solve traffic and transport problems in the cities is to encourage people from suburbs or the countryside to live in the cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Ielts Essay Transport Migration  

Moving people back into the cities to rid of challenges posed by urban traffic and transportation, seems to be a radical solution and can go a long way in rendering an ease to the urbanites.  

Many advocate implementing this idea and feel it could bring a sea change in  the way people live in urban societies. This view is primarily based on the assumption that the majority of motorists and public modes of transit that ply on/ use the city roads hail from areas lying outside the municipal limits of the urban locations. Those  entering and leaving the cities must brave long travel and distance every day. If these people were made to dwell in the same urban locations where they work, they would be spared of covering long distances every day. The shorter drive would only use the shorter stretches and that also for brief moments rather than hours. Similarly, this would affect limited parts instead of the whole urban road network. 

Additionally,  since the brief commute and travel would also afford security to people, especially the women, youngsters and the elderly, many may feel encouraged to switch to public modes of transit like buses and metro trains if their homes and workplaces lie in close proximity to each other.Since these modes could also be used in the late evenings safely, further inspiring the commuters to use these. On top of that, many policy makers and town planners are quite optimistic that many fitness enthusiasts might also be inspired to abandon mechanized modes of transportation and switch to simpler means like bicycles. This would surely help in thinning the traffic.

Therefore, there is hardly any reservation to be expressed regarding the efficacy of this revolutionary concept, and I absolutely concur with the impact this will have on urban roads. Moreover, I feel this could also help stem urban sprawl, an indirect benefit

Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.

Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.    

Ielts Essay Shortlisting students on the basis of academic records  

In order to make learning  more meaningful, many educationalists  have started proposing creating a bifurcation among the fast and slow learners in their formative years. This has initiated a  profound debate since many out rightly reject the former view.

Short listing learners as per their abilities to grab things can help save time and efforts of both, teachers and pupils. Tutors can stay focused on uniform strategies  that address the requirements of learners specifically. For instance, a setting that is populated with young learners who excel in academics, would need a method that facilitates rapid learning, while a class that has slow learners needs the sessions to be more explicit and slow to allow slow learners to grasp the content.  

Moreover, tutors will be spared of flak from students with the latter blaming them  for harboring partisan attitude towards bright or dull pupils. Admittedly, in  mixed ability classes, the progress often relies on collective outcomes, quite unwelcoming for those quick at grasping content. They complain of teachers deliberately slowing down the process to aid academically weaker. Same is true of the slow learners who often feel alienated with teachers involving brighter pupils in discussions.

Nevertheless,   critics of such settings assert that adopting this kind of practice will mean defeating the very purpose of education and promoting a permanent wedge between the learners quite early on which may become insurmountable later. The fundamental principle of formal tuition is promoting equality along with instilling wisdom and not training young minds to harbor ill-feelings for each other.

Hence, it can be said that harboring such discriminatory system will do more harm than good. In order to bolster excellence, basic tenets of education should not be abandoned, so I detest the arrangement of segregation and selective enrollment of pupils.