In many countries the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Some think this is good, while others believe this is a problem for a country. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

 In many countries the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Some think this is good, while others believe this is a problem for a country. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

In recent times, there has been a steady growth in the population of senior citizens in numerous countries around the world. Some people believe it to be good whereas others consider this as a serious issue. In my opinion, this is a serious problem and I shall discuss the issue with relevant examples.

It is commonly believed that, an older population is a sign of a developed nation along with numerous other benefits like reduced stress in populated areas and a more sustainable society. The population on the whole reduces as the number of old people rise inturn reducing the stress on the natural resources leading to an increase in the quality of living. For instance, as per a study conducted in the UK, in the last decade alone, a population increase of 10 percent among senior citizens has led to an increase in the quality of life by almost 20 percent.

 

However, there are many people who believe that an older population has a detrimental effect on the growth of the economy inturn affecting the future prospects of the countries facing this issue. A case in point being, as the population grows older the amount of government spending on health care and social security increase significantly, leading to reduced spending on more important aspects like education. To illustrate, as per the latest data UK spends 4 percent of its GDP on social security benefits to the elderly which is amongst the highest in comparison to other countries.

In conclusion, from the above discussion it can been inferred that although there are various positives of having a growing number of elderly in the population but the the negatives outweigh the advantages significantly.

Some people think that parents should teach their children about the importance of recycling, while others think it should be taught in school. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

 Some people think that parents should teach their children about the importance of recycling, while others think it should be taught in school. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Why Schools

1. Schools can handle such important areas very carefully and effectively - by designing appropriate courseware, arranging resources like faculty and teaching about technical aspects of this process - which will help convince young minds about the relevance of this process. 

2. Schools are vested/ given with the obligation /duty  of polishing the personalities of children - recycling is likely to become an important trait of personalities of rational adults, it should be fostered during formative years. 

3. They learn better in a formal environment, among their peers, and also grab the content clearly which is retained longer

Why Parents 

1. Parents are role models for their wards and the latter follow the footsteps and precedents set by the former without questioning: What parents will do will automatically be grasped by the latter. 

2. This skills is better learnt in practical environment and this can be rendered easily by families

With the rising threat to the environment nowadays, many opine that the importance of recycling should be taught to the young oneS by their parents. However, this has ensued a profound debate as many believe that such tasks should be learnt at schools.

It is said virtue begins at home, thus, learning of a skill like recycling must be taught there. Mothers and fathers can set precedents in front of their wards to show its importance. As children look up to their parents as their role models, they can persuade the former to embrace the art of reusing effectively. Moreover, this process is usually  illustrated practically where the elders are seen following the method of reusing household goods of various kinds, which the young ones start following without questioning.   

Nevertheless, many do not go with the former opinion, as per them a specialised task such as recycling must be learned about at formal tuition. These institutions  have every apparatus to teach young ones about this process. Schools can inculcate this learning in their curriculum which can help their students to acquire substantial knowledge about recycling. 

Moreover, another view that one can hardly overlook is that youngsters building their moral character during their schooling which is an important perspective for making children to indulge themselves in the process of reusing, thus, it becomes an obligation for these institutions to make their students learn such important operations.

To recapitulate, controversies apart I strongly believe recycling is an immensely important task that every youngster should learn to make this process work effectively, and this can only be achieved when both parents and schools will take onus of this activity, since they influence young ones equally.

The growth of online shopping will one day lead to all shops in towns and cities closing. Do you agree or disagree?

 

The growth of online shopping will one day lead to all shops in towns and cities closing. Do you agree or disagree?

    

The onslaught of online shopping portals has raised the likelihood of these overwhelming shops, and thus the latter might cease to exist. But will this really happen, or not has profoundly intrigued many.    

 

The opinion of retail outlets shutting down their business in wake of fast becoming ubiquitous e-shopping is based on the assumption that as people are becoming more and more engaged in the professional and social pursuits, they are likely have lesser and lesser time for an auxiliary activity like going for shopping.  They may prefer saving the efforts of visiting shopping districts or even nearby outlets and get the things delivered at their doorsteps.

However, many commentators consider this probability as a mere illusion. In their view retail stores can never shut their shops due to the trust they enjoy among billions of shoppers, who cannot imagine buying anything without physically inspecting the merchandise. Besides this, one can hardly discount the impatient shoppers who cannot wait to lay their hands on the goods as soon as they buy. For such people online buying shall always remain a distant dream, thereby letting the stores continue.

 

On top of that, the charm of visiting retail outlets will refuse to fade because of those innumerable buyers who perceive this activity as a leisure. Visiting shopping centres allows them a healthy distraction from the daily humdrum and break the mundane; and socialize with their nears and dears, and peers. For such people going shopping is a ritual which fetches immense pleasure and that is irreplaceable by online shopping.

 

Overall, I fail to concur with this statement that stores will be superseded by online shopping. Despite rapid spread of new ways of buying things the retail outlets will never cease to exist.

In some countries children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough. What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message?

In some countries children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough. What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message?

Lately, children are being educated by their parents and teachers that anything can be achieved by them if they try hard and stay determined towards their goal. Disseminating such learning has both ups as well as downs because of many reasons which will be discussed further in detail. 

As children are being told about the outcomes and success associated with hard work. This motivates them to concentrate on their objectives in a more lucid manner without doubting the potential of their capabilities and efforts that they devote to their endeavors. They themselves learn the significance of being passionate about their desired goals and also dealing with tough and challenging situations without surrendering. Besides this, such a saying transforms the complete personality and perspective of young individuals from an early age, they always carry a positive attitude toward life. Also, in order to define their success they work harder that influences them to look for alternative way outs and this leads them to be a rational and smart personality later in life.

Nevertheless, the biggest disadvantage of the notion that enough of hard work can led to secure anything is that children at such a young age get obsessed with one or couple of ideas and streams, and to prove their worth, they keep on attempting for a same thing over and over – causing deterioration of mental and emotional wellbeing, another is the loss of valuable time which could have been utilized in exploring areas that might have offered a greater chance of success in their personal and professional realms.

Overall, saying that trying hard enough can lead to attaining anything has its own pros and cons. It is a term that need to be dealt with care as it can lead to more negative consequences. 

With the development of social media, more and more youngsters are being allowed unsupervised access to internet in order to meet and chat with friends which can lead to potentially dangerous situations. What kind of problems this can cause and what solutions can you suggest to deal with this?

 

With the development of social media, more and more youngsters are being allowed unsupervised access to internet in order to meet and chat with friends which can lead to potentially dangerous situations. What kind of problems this can cause and what solutions can you suggest to deal with this?

                 

The ubiquitous social media has influenced everyone, especially the young who  are afforded an unchecked allowance to interact with friends. This has worried many social theorists who fear that this can result in severe predicaments. Although online social networking is unavoidable, there are remedies available that can help overcome challenges posed by this development.

 

Unmonitored interaction with the virtual social networking is predisposing young minds to behavior distortion.  Undeniably, human behavior can adapt to the changing conditions, the traits experienced in the physical world have successfully transferred to the virtual realm too. When these individuals observe their peers indulging in acts of bullying or stalking, they too are inspired to follow the suit and pick up those aggressive behavioral traits, feeling they cannot be questioned for online activities.

 

Another conspicuous complication stemming from this  phenomenon is the undue stress induced by inability to strike a balance  between physical and virtual life. The young are obligated to respond to the posts of their friends, or they might have to face a flak from the latter. This taxes their strength and focus, leaving them drained, and with little energy and inclination to handle their other tasks, specifically their academic pursuits. 

 

Nevertheless, a little judicious approach can help mitigate the risks associated with virtual social network access. It is necessary that parents first should educate themselves about the downsides of this activity, and then counsel their wards about the associated risks and legal implications. This could go a long way in creating fear and enlightenment among tender minds, making them cautious.

 

Overall, each innovation  has certain failings and likewise social networking enjoys its own share. So, to not to let the young individuals come in harm's way, parents must act pragmatically and inform themselves of perils, and guide their little ones.  

 

Some parents say that children should play individually more than in a group. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this and include your own opinion.

Some parents say that children should play individually more than in a group. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this and include your own opinion.

 

Playing is very crucial for the development of the young ones. There is a lobby that believes they can learn more while playing independently rather than playing in teams. This essay shall delve into the positive and negative aspects of this practice.

When children play in isolation without their friends or anyone else, they get deprived of numerous skills and values. They do not get an opportunity to learn social, as well as moral values, such as sharing, caring, communicating, developing social networks, cooperation, and so on. As a result of which, some of them become introverts when they turn into teenagers, and due to the lack of confidence, they find it difficult to muster courage while approaching others.

Additionally, if they play individually they never get satisfied with what they have, resulting in the spiralling of their demands to possess a diverse range of toys and games; however, they can satiate their desires by borrowing from their teammates while playing. Furthermore, parents are less worried about their wards since they get a company of others as nowadays, they are highly engaged in their work-life owing to which they do not get adequate time to look after their children round the clock.

The children start comparing with others present in the group, which pose a difficulty for some parents who cannot afford a similar lifestyle for them, thereby, escalating their financial obligations and pushing them into crisis. Moreover, they do not always look for the support of someone to amuse themselves.

To reiterate, for the holistic development of the children, playing in teams will be of great afford for them. The drawbacks of playing independently eclipse its merits; hence, I fail to concur with the statement.

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Of late, many have been suggesting establishing fast train networks to render ease to those travelling between different cities. However, a section of urban town planners and transport authority suggest that it is more important to revamp the existing mass transit system. 

With the ever-growing population, it has become indispensable to ponder over an alternative in railways to ease the struggle of the people. There is a lobby that believes the establishment of new railway lines to connect different areas would be of great affordance for the urbanites. This essay will justify the rationale behind their perspective and discuss that of others.

In the era of fast-paced life, rapid mode of transport to improve the connectivity between the cities is the need of the hour across the globe. People living in cities and suburbs end up wasting plenty of time in commuting through conventional train systems. With their hectic schedules, as well as the time spent in travelling, they do not get much time to spend with their loved ones. Moreover, this affects their productivity and efficacy as well due to arriving late in the office as travelling for hours makes them exhausted.

However, the other lobby suggests to enhance and make some advancements in the existing public transportation services. They believe that by improving the frequency of public vehicles to accommodate the residents could resolve the problems faced by them.

To reiterate, after assessing both the views, I feel that by ameliorating the public transportation services, public funds can be saved which can be further utilised in other endeavours for the welfare of the inhabitants along with the alleviation of the existing troubles of the people.

Nowadays people are spending too much money to celebrate personal and family events such as weddings, birthdays and so on. Do you agree or disagree with the statement? Give your opinion and examples?

Nowadays people are spending too much money to celebrate personal and family events such as weddings, birthdays and so on. Do you agree or disagree with the statement? Give your opinion and examples?

Celebrations render moments to make memories with friends, as well as relatives and cherish them for a lifetime. There is a lobby that believes these days extravagant parties, get-togethers, and so on, are in vogue. This essay will justify the rationale behind their perspective and discuss that of others.

In the contemporary era, people are busy with their hectic schedules. Due to which they do not get adequate time to spend with their loved ones. Whenever they get an opportunity to come together on special occasions, they try to make it memorable by spending lavishly on everything, from a wide array of food to trending decoration and so on. Moreover, Nowadays, this craving is inspired by the festivities organised by celebrities and many tend to emulate them.

Furthermore, some people like to flaunt every happy moment of their lives, especially in the era dominated by social media. They believe this practice elevates their prestige in society. Moreover, in yesteryears, by keeping in mind the unforeseen downturns, people believed in saving funds for their future; however, individuals of this era live in the present without giving a thought about the future and end up spending extravagantly.

However, the young generation is well aware of all the wastage of food and various other items in the events and its detrimental effects on the environment. To convey the message of sustainability, they rather organise events in a greener way thereby, saving funds which they further utilise in the welfare of the society by helping the needy and alleviating the world-wide concern of poverty.

To reiterate, despite some modest ways of celebrating by the young people, a majority of individuals squander money in a great amount on the occasions. Hence, I concur with the statement.

Nowadays children prefer electronic games to other games and toys. Why is it happening? Is it a positive or negative development?

Nowadays children prefer electronic games to other games and toys. Why is it happening? Is it a positive or negative development?

In the era of technology, all spheres of life have changed dramatically. In contemporary times, youngsters have a penchant towards computerized games instead of indoor, as well as outdoor games. This essay shall delve into the reasons behind this trend, and explore whether this is a favorable or unfavorable evolution. 

With the ever-changing technology and fast-paced innovations, nowadays, children are well equipped with gadgets such as smartphones, laptops, play stations and so on. Due to the introduction of umpteen of electronic games and the emergence of advanced animations like 3D, 4D, 7D, and many more, young ones find them irresistible thereby, relinquishing other games and becoming addicted  to them. Furthermore, The round-the-clock internet connectivity is also fueling this yearning since this enables them to play these games as per their convenience, and renders a chance to download most of them free of charge.

The rising obsession for electronic playthings among youngsters is aiding in introducing technology to them and  making them tech savvy, which will surely prove to be highly beneficial in later life. Moreover, the indulgence in electronic games helps children in developing strategy building skills and stimulating creativity, as well as innovation, which contribute to their cognitive development.

However, there are certain failings to this inclination. Since most young ones are engaging with such devices for long hours, this results in affecting their health adversely, weakening eyesight, back pains and corpulence are some of the  outcomes of such indulgence. Additionally, they fail to strike a balance between their study and leisure time. Consequently, their academic performance  suffers,  they are unable to focus on their studies and are always lost in the virtual world.  

To reiterate, despite some negative aspects of this practice, its merits prevail. It is the onus on parents to monitor their wards and control their addiction to electronic games by allotting appropriate time to each activity.

Many organisations and companies ask their staff to wear a uniform. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? What kind of jobs should have a work uniform?

 

Many organisations and companies ask their staff to wear a uniform. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? What kind of jobs should have a work uniform?

 

A predefined official attire plays a vital role in a few professions as it serves various purposes, while in some one is not required to follow official dress codes.  Regardless of whether they are stipulated or not,  uniforms have their benefits and drawbacks.

 

Formal ensembles earn wearers a distinct identity which allows them to be distinguished from others: people in armed forces and law enforcement agencies, to name a few, must to dressed up in a specific way to let them stand out of the crowd, and thereby remain approachable when someone in dire need requires their assistance. Besides this, it is undeniable that having formal office attire fuels and promotes corporate identity and lets people experience confidence and a sense of belongingness to the organization for which they are working. On top of that, making everyone in the working environment wear similar clothes provided by the employers also helps bring in a sense of equality and harmony among the colleagues

 

Nevertheless, even though having a unique attire is considered to be essential in occupations that need interaction with public - such as in hospitality, medicine, police, or where there is a certain hazard  involved like those which needs one to work in mines, or on workshop floor, it is certainly not needed in professional engagements which need workers and professional to stay create and look approachable. For example, teaching hardly has any need to create a distinct identity. Those  engaged in this work encourage self and personality development,  and creativity which is more focused on enhancing personal and public persona.

 

 

To recapitulate, uniforms surely offer more pros than cons, but they must be enforced only where requirements of unique looks, equality,  and safety are paramount, while they should not be obligatory at other places.

 

Nowadays children are consuming too many sugar based drinks, what are the reasons and solutions for this situation? Discuss and give reasons for your answer in at least words.

Nowadays children are consuming too many sugar based drinks, what are the reasons and solutions for this situation? Discuss and give reasons for your answer in at least words.

In the contemporary era, the intake of beverages with high sugar content among youngsters has been spiralling out of control. This essay shall delve into the reasons behind this trend, and propose initiatives to resolve it.

Advertisements have been primarily blamed for the rising craving among the young ones for sweetened drinks. Nowadays, markets are flooded with ads of a wide array of these drinks with different flavours, brands, prices, and so on. Their influence is being consolidated by commercials that overwhelm tender minds and push them to consume such drinks. Furthermore, they are endorsed by the child celebrities which makes them more eye-catching thereby, escalating the desires of young ones to buy them.

In addition to above, parents are the role models to their wards. The children have immature minds and cannot distinguish right from wrong, they simply try to emulate their mothers and fathers. When these young ones observe them enjoying beverages with high sugar content, they end up following their footsteps without giving a second thought, to get to know about the taste owing to their cravings and unknowingly become habitual of them.

There are a plethora of solutions to alleviate this problem. Parents can take the initiatives to make their wards comprehend by not indulging themselves in the intake of such sweetened drinks, thereby setting a precedent for them.  Due to the innate imitative behaviour of the young minds, this would help alleviate their longing of trying such drinks. Moreover, elders should enlighten their wards about the detrimental effects of consuming sugar based drinks.

To reiterate, I feel even though excessive consumption of sugary beverages by youngsters is surely a growing and a worrying problem, it can be surmounted easily provided parents take the initiative and limit their own consumption. 

Some people think that shops should sell the food products from the local area, rather than selling products imported from other countries. Do you agree or disagree?

 

Some people think that shops should sell the food products from the local area, rather than selling products imported from other countries. Do you agree or disagree?

The world has evolved into a global village where people can access the goods and services available across the world. There is a lobby that believes instead of selling edible goods belonging to foreign countries, stores should deal with the local produce. This essay will justify the rationale behind their inclination towards the local food items.

The advent of globalization has opened up horizons for the consumers, in terms of food which can be brought in from any part of the world now. This has also irked many who believe that this might impact local communities unfavorably, so outlets should prioritize sales of domestic produce though others  contest this.  

The goods from alien societies replace the shelves consisting of local food entailing the wastage of procured food items, thereby affecting the financial health of local producers, manufacturers as well as sellers. Besides this, the phenomenal price of the imported edible food adds insult to injury due to which a slew of people fail to afford them resulting in pronounced social fault lines between haves and have nots.

Furthermore, local markets bolster the natives by extending fresh and healthy edible merchandise while the products procured from others countries takes several days to arrive in the destination nation, and a wide array of preservatives, as well as chemicals, are utilised to preserve them and to make them look fresh owing to which they fail to retain the nutrients.

However, many propose allowing sales of overseas food products. This would render consumers opportunity to enjoy a rich profusion of delicacies from all over the world to satiate their palate. This practice will aid in enlightening them about a variety of exotic edible items available across the length and breadth of the globe, enhancing their worldview. Moreover, the exchange of products will help in fostering the bonhomie among different nations simultaneously, boosting their economies.

Overall, the positive aspects of selling local produce completely eclipse the merits of imported food items since the former would be of great afford for the society in terms of price, health, and so on. Hence, I concur with the statement.

Foreign tourists must be charged higher fees than local people to visit cultural places and historical sites. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion including relevant examples.

Foreign tourists must be charged higher fees than local people to visit cultural places and historical sites. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion including relevant examples.

 

It is generally seen that tourist attractions such as monuments, historical sites and various cultural places impose higher charges on overseas travellers. I do agree with this idea and believe that similar access fees should be charged from everyone.

 

When tourists are charged higher, they take back the impression of discrimination towards them. This act discourages foreigners from visiting places of tourist attraction, whereas if levied equally, they would persuade their immediate family and friends to visit such places which ultimately helps increase the tourist inflow, resulting in phenomenal growth in the earnings of the tourism industry and thereby, boosting the economy. 

 

Furthermore, this will help in spreading the culture around the world: more and more alien visitors will be willing to explore the culture and traditions of the host society. Thus, making a society and its culture appear more prominently at the global level. For example, Dilli Haat in Delhi India, due to its nominal access charges that are similar for all, has gained visibility across the world and attracts a great number of travellers every year who gain an enriching experience by visiting this location.

 

Moreover, due to the surge in the number of overseas travellers, the local nearby vendors get profited. This astronomical revenue benefits the government as well through the taxes. The government can use these funds in the maintenance of historical places. From this perspective, equal entrance fees would be of great advantage and have a better impact.

 

To conclude, having the same ticket fee, both from local people as well as foreign travellers to visit various cultural and historical places like monuments, parks, regional fests and so on, will be more beneficial. Hence, I fail to concur with the statement. 

OR

 

It is generally seen that tourist attractions such as monuments, historical sites and various cultural places impose higher entry charges on overseas travellers. I do agree with this notion and believe that similar access free shouldn’t be charged from everyone.

 

Many are in favor of this arrangement. When tourists are charged higher, this will help in boosting the economy of the host country and developing the tourism industry. As this access fees will help local governments generate money for the maintenance of the heritage sites. Otherwise, they will have to channelize funds from the public budget. From this perspective, having higher fees for foreign travellers has a better impact.

 

In addition to the above, imposing higher fees will also help in maintaining the novelty value that means when people pay for something, they value it more. For instance, the Louvre Museum in Paris costs a lot to enter, attracts a cluster of people every year while the Cathedral de Paris has no entrance fees thereby, doesn’t experience such an influx.

 

Similarly, the local people must be aware of their national cultures and the past associated with historical sites. The government should keep low access fees to encourage them to visit such places and imbibe the knowledge regarding their country. Furthermore, the residents cannot be charged higher since they pay taxes and are the true owners of such locations, along with being informal ambassadors of such locations.

 

To conclude, having the same ticket fee, both from local people as well as foreign travellers to visit various cultural and historical places like monuments, parks, regional fests and so on, will be unfair to the natives and unfavourable to the economy as well. Hence, I concur with the statement.

We can get knowledge from news, but some people think we can’t trust the journalist. Discuss and give your opinion. What do you think is the important qualities that a journalist should have?

We can get knowledge from news, but some people think we can’t trust the journalist. Discuss and give your opinion. What do you think is the important qualities that a journalist should have? 

Can we trust journalists? 

Yes

·         Barring a few, most are devoted to this noble task, they never let any kind of inducement interfere with their professional objectives. 

·         They risk not on their but also the lives of their family members 

No  

·         There have been cases, although rare, infrequent, sporadic which have cast a doubt on the sanctity of this profession. Some people are stimulated by commercial compulsions: viewership and readership ratings 

·         Political correctness has also had a corrupting influence on them. They are driven by the majority opinion. They avoid derision and indignation of the masses and their fraternity  

·         influence of elite and powerful who reward them for the

Qualities 

·         Unbiased, impartial 

·         Non-judgemental 

·         Emphatic - must practice self censure to avoid presenting news  in such way that could cause social discord 

·         Fear less 

·         Incorruptible 

·         Good communicator 

·         Having knowledge of the subject, they are presenting reports about  

2nd para accepting that reporters cannot be trusted 

3rd they can be trusted 

Qualities 

Even though journalism is considered to be a profession for those who are righteous, impartial and fearless, it is losing its reliability due to some going astray due to the allure created by commercial and financial inducements. However, many are steadfast about their view that those engaged in this occupation can still  be relied upon. 55

Of late, news reporters are losing their followers due to many being lured into misreporting, by virtue of certain inducements. I shall be elaborating this  and the contra view on this issue and also share some inputs on ideal traits of a reporter.43

Although in small numbers, some harbor suspicions towards the intentions of correspondents, who they allege adopting a partisan  attitude towards certain people: influential and elite, and try to manipulate the news to favor the latter. There have been instances where some reporters have resorted to presenting edited and distorted information to benefit those, flooding them with monetary resources and other facilities. 

Nevertheless, those vouching for the journalists profess that the public indignation invited upon for these people is unjust. It is not these scribes who are swayed by inducements, but the media houses that engage  them. It is a grim reality that most of the news presenting agencies are owned by industry moguls who want reporting in their favor, whereas, reporters are always at odds with their employers. This can be elucidated by the fact that most of these professionals keep hopping jobs in search of an  establishment that is guided  by true virtues  of journalism.

Journalists have always relied upon their transparent and non-judgemental attitude towards work. They are rarely driven by any inducements, and instead the goal of presenting unbiased inputs to the masses has always been their stimulus. Similarly, their fearlessness is an ideal for many, where they are prepared to jeopardize not only their but also the safety of their nears and dears. 

Overall, controversies apart, a few exceptions are incapable of tarnishing the image of this noble occupation, where those engaged in reporting face several perils and hazards to fulfill their professional obligations.

 

Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching. With the technology available today there is no justification for it, and everything should be done online. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your own opinion.

Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching. With the technology available today there is no justification for it, and everything should be done online. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your own opinion.

 

In this era of technology, all spheres of life have changed dramatically. With the emergence of it, the traditional mode of teaching has taken a back seat while online classes have become a buzzword in recent years, and I agree with this idea and believe that the merits of online teaching outstrip the ancient way of teaching; thus, the latter should be shelved.

 

The idea of imparting knowledge by making optimal use of technology would benefit the institutions intensely. The cost of building infrastructure, hiring staff for its maintenance and many more will save a phenomenal amount of money which can be utilised for further advancements and facilities. From this perspective, online education would be of great advantage and have a better impact.

 

Similarly, this will be favourable for students as well. The online mode can help them in saving the most precious commodity: the time, which is usually wasted in commuting. The time saved can be used more productively by investing it in studying. Moreover, this will also allow saving money otherwise expended on travelling to and from educational institutions; and buying books, and uniform, and so on. Concurrently, this has also aided educational establishments to widen their outreach among the learners.   

 

On top of that with its vast reach, online methods of teaching have helped drive in another major benefit. Students can have access to education even from remote areas, they only require an internet connection to study. Because of this flexibility and convenience, online lectures are becoming very popular among people.

 

To reiterate, in recent years, a considerable rise in popularity of online teaching has overwhelmed society. Due to its efficacy, convenience and cost-effectiveness, as well, the traditional mode of classroom teaching can be substituted.  

 

OR 

 

In this era of technology, all spheres of life have changed dramatically. With the emergence of it, the traditional mode of teaching has taken a back seat while online classes have become a buzzword in recent years and I disagree with this idea and believe that the merits of an ancient way of teaching outstrip online mode of teaching.

 

The traditional way of teaching aids in maximizing productivity of the students. In classrooms, learners get a more serious and formal environment which helps them to concentrate better on their studies. Moreover, this instils a sense of discipline since they are always under observation of their tutors, due to which they remain focussed all the time. With this perspective, the conventional method affords greater advantages and has a better impact.

 

In addition to the above, face to face conversation leads to better comprehension. Classroom teaching allows students to interact with lecturers in person when there is clarification required and it is extremely convenient to understand when people are physically present at one place. Such methods help establish a bond between teachers and students, alleviating the hesitation in the students. Therefore, the traditional mode of teaching is irreplaceable. 

 

To reiterate, recent years have seen a considerable rise in online teaching since technology has practically taken over lives. However, the traditional mode of imparting knowledge cannot be substituted due to its efficacy and productivity as well. Hence, I fail to concur with the statement.

The international community should reduce or eliminate the debts of the world’s poorest countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The international community should reduce or eliminate the debts of the world’s poorest countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Elite countries should step forward and help developing countries by easing up their financial obligations. This proposal is beneficial and humane can help the world prosper faster. I agree with this idea and believe that such measures should be adopted to alleviate the misfortunes of poverty-stricken societies.

 

By taking monetary aid from the communities, poor countries, which are trapped in a vicious circle, will be able to stand on their feet once again. These nations can utilize this amount to ameliorate the life of their citizens by rendering efficient and advanced facilities. Moreover, with these funds, these countries will be able to improve the infrastructure and create numerous opportunities in almost every realm. With this perspective, reducing the financial liability will aid in the progress of the underdeveloped countries.

 

On top of that, this may also help in mitigating the global crisis caused by the exodus of people, of deprived societies, seeking shelter in rich countries as refugees to escape poverty in their homelands. Such movements impose an immense -pressure on the local economies of the elite nations, but the governments  seem  helpless due to absence of opportunities in economically weaker nations, who in turn  are cowed down by huge repayment burdens. If the loans extended were pardoned, the poor nations would be able to create better opportunities for their natives,  preventing the latter from seeking refuge in other parts of the world.   

 

To reiterate, I completely concur with this proposal since pardoning loans seems to be the only way in the current scenario, which can aid in upheaval of those living in deprivation in various parts of the world. This will have a long lasting impact on the global society. 

In order to mitigate the troubles and financial liabilities of indigent countries around the world, the international organisations should take effective and immediate initiatives for improving the standard of living of the population.