Some people believe that individuals who earn a lot of money are the most successful. Others say that the individuals who contribute to the society (such as scientists or teachers) are the most successful. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
To embark upon the discussion there are a plethora of reasons that support the fact that prosperous people are successful, as with their wealth they can own mansions, swanky cars, afford foreign destinations for holidays and various such other comforts which many may aspire to possess in their life.
Furthermore, they can plan their future and make best investments and afford an easy life to their wards Thus, securing their and the future of their children. They do not have to struggle as the have-nots, but can buy whatever they aspire for; thus, fulfilling all their dreams which can be definitely termed as success.
Having said that, there are contrasting viewpoints, as many believe that basking in luxury or amassing wealth for oneself is transient success, instead invigorating significant changes and efforts for making life of others easier, paying back to the society in their own way is the success in true sense and spirit. For instance, individuals such as Martin Luther King Jr., Nelson Mandela, and so forth, may not be earning astronomically, but they establish an enduring legacy of praisable work, fetching them an unswerving following, and affection of people, and thus fame, which outstrips wealth by miles.
To cap it all, undoubtedly this is a debatable issue and there is polarisation of beliefs. However, I perceive that the ability to be influenced by positive work and earning possessions in abundance both are indeed the indicators of achievements.
