People Working at higher levels of the companies should be paid more than the workers at lower levels. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In contemporary times, a profound debate has arisen regarding the pay scale at different organizational levels. The supervisory and managerial levels are being paid hefty amounts when compared to the individuals at lower levels. I partially accord with the given ideology and reason for my opinion will be elucidated in the forthcoming paragraphs.
To commence with, the rationale supporting this approach is founded on the belief that the people working at the higher levels are not only held obligated for their work but also accountable for the task performed by their subordinates. The intensity of stress they face at their level is much higher than those working under them. This makes them deserving recipients of better remuneration than their subordinates.
Similarly, the individuals at the higher positions are equipped with humongous experience, which plays a major role when preparing business strategies; to remain ahead of their competition – this attribute is missing in those engaged at the junior ranks. This phenomenon can also act as a motivation for the individuals working at lower positions to remain focussed and effective so that they can also reach at top level in the organization hierarchy and earn better.
However, the critics to this notion believe that those working at the lower level form the plinth of the performance; therefore, they should be compensated in the same manner. Apart from this, the cost of living is affecting everyone equally; thus, practicing bias on the salary element would make the people working at lower levels have an unwarranted impact.
To end the discussion, I believe that differences in salary structure of higher and lower levels are quite justifiable simply by virtue of being responsible for a broader list of obligations and wider operational areas.
