Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians. What are the reasons for this? Is it a positive or negative development?
 |
| Ielts Essay Celebrities and Politicians |
Many
celebrated people are earning way more than those involved in politics do. This
can be attributed to various causes. However, this has sparked an unlikely but
fierce argument over the impact of this, trying to arrive at the conclusion,
about this having favorable or unfavorable consequences.
Astronomical
sums being grossed by noted figures in sports and various forms of art, which
is relatively higher than what policy makers can make, has become possible due
to wider mass appeal enjoyed by the former. Entertainment in all its
manifestations has become a lucrative industry – due to globalization – that invites
huge investments, often resulting in high remuneration for those associated
with it, whereas politicians earn perks received from the government.
This,
has been hailed as a beneficial phenomenon: many intending to earn fortune make
a beeline for the glamour, while politics is left to those who believe that governance is not the forte of every one and earnings are
not the criteria of a realm like this. Such people are devoted and
inclined to serve the society, and out of their initiatives, they selflessly
lead the their countrymen to prosperity.
However, this imbalance in
earnings has caused an alarm among many. Money rules the roost and this aspect
can make celebrities overwhelmingly more influential than the ruling executive.
This can lead to chaos and many a times it has been observed that the former, enjoying
mass appeal, force their way into the regime and influence decisions.
In hindsight, the influence and outreach of celebrated
personalities is the prime source of sky-high earnings. I feel that although this
might seem a little grim to some, it is in fact a favorable development
since this leaves only dedicated people in the fray to join politics and
take up important public roles.
