Many nations like to
host international sporting events, but people are against it. Describe both
views and give your own opinion
 |
| Ielts Essay - Sports Extravaganzas |
International sporting carnivals have become
a fad among the global community, and many big cities constantly vie for
hosting these events, but there is a lobby that is vehemently criticizes such
hosting attempts. Both cite several reasons to support their viewpoints.
Getting a chance of organizing games, like
Olympics, not only helps a nation portray its image as being young and full of
flair, to the outer world, but also stimulate interest among the locals towards
sports. When a city is chosen for an edition of such large-scale festivals, its
sports infrastructure gets a much required injection of critical funding and
support. Such development helps inspire inhabitants of the host city, as well
as country to participate actively in sports; thereby encouraging healthy
lifestyles.
Moreover, getting an opportunity to be a venue
of such global level carnivals helps stimulate activity in various sectors and
areas of the local economy, tourism being most prominent of them all. When
visitors from other parts of world arrive as followers of teams and spectators,
they visit other parts of the city and the country. In the process, they make
use of infrastructure and services; buy goods, etc. thereby leading to a spur
in business and employment.
However, the detractors of such occasions
cite several reasons for their criticism. Cities acting as venues of such
global level events tend to waste a lot of public money in useless extravaganza
by way of spending immense amounts on first constructing and later maintaining
facilities meant to host matches and games; resulting in huge public debt that takes
long to repay back, thus taxing the governments and the people.
Henceforth, I believe criticism may be true
to some extent, organizing global level games has several long-term benefits
