Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion. ~ Sanchit

Of late, many educators have started to engage in a heated debate regarding the criteria one must meet in order to get admitted into an academic institution, some believe that individuals should be accepted on the basis of their educational merits, while there are a few who believe that it would be much more wiser to have a mix of students with varying potential studying together.  

 

A great deal of schools take pride in nurturing exceptional scholastic talent, it is their belief that good grades are a necessity for an educational establishment to become renowned and sustain their excellence/finesse in educating the society.  Moreover, this traditional view strongly disapproves of granting admission to those who are not good at studies as teaching and putting efforts on them would be a waste of time and energy. Similarly, allowing dull pupils to study with those with higher intellect will only slow down the imparting process, and cause distractions.

 

However, there is a lobby which believes that teaching pupils with different abilities together is a much more prudent and practical approach to bring out their innate aptitude lying dormant inside of them and to develop their unique personalities. As different ideas and moral values would clash they would create an atmosphere for innovation and help students to improve their social skills by making them more open minded and tolerant towards each other. In addition to this, it would instil a positive competitive spirit among peers to do better which would surely help the academically weaker improve themselves.  

 

In hindsight, I opine that teaching learners who have different capabilities together would help them to appreciate and develop their distinct characters. Thus, it would be a better idea to teach people with different abilities to be taught together.

 

 

 

Wild animals have no place in the 21st century. Some people think that preventing these wild animals from dying out is a waste of resource. In what extent do you agree or disagree?

Wild animals have no place in the 21st century. Some people think that preventing these wild animals from dying out is a waste of resource. In what extent do you agree or disagree?

Ielts Essay Wild Animals 

In recent years, a ridiculous theory is being promulgated about letting wild fauna become extinct to conserve resources. This has drawn a lot of flak from various quarters who question the very relevance and rationale of this proposal. 

Critics of this proposal assert the real objective behind wildlife conservation initiatives is protecting wild habitats, the forests that . These green buffers besides acting as lungs of the planet that recycle the air and also inviting precipitation, act as a vital link with the past. These pristine locations can provide important information on how life evolved, as well as the solutions for the problems humanity is currently facing, and also those may surface in future. 

Moreover,  undeniably, life on the earth depends on diverse components, and wild animals form a critical part of that arrangement: their disappearance would result in great ecological imbalance, delivering catastrophic impact on humans several many ways. As experts suggest, wild fauna helps contain many pests and diseases since all of them are a part of an elaborate food chain. Even if a single element of this table vanishes, the whole system will collapse.

Nevertheless, although, beyond any rationale, many argue that how can public money be squandered on such ambitious projects when the house needs to be put in order. With billions languishing in poverty, struggling to make their both ends meet and access even basic amenities, these programs are a novelty, a passion for the elite who have little respect for those impoverished. 

In hindsight, I strongly feel that under no circumstances should the wildlife be allowed to vanish, it will cause irreversible damage and threaten the very existence of mankind. It is the need of the hour for humans to step forward and act responsibly, and protect their co-inhabitants.     

Many organisations and companies ask their staff to wear a uniform. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? What kind of jobs should have a work uniform?

Ielts Essay Uniform

Organization specific dress codes have become ubiquitous and almost all businesses, regardless of size, comply with the trend. This has led to an intriguing but a fierce debate about the benefits and downsides of this practice besides. One does wonder, however, about what work should follow a dress code.   

Undeniably, standardized clothing patterns facilitate blurring differences and promoting harmony among personnel, hailing for diverse socioeconomic and cultural backgrounds. This makes colleagues abandon discrimination and  embrace homogeneity and instead pursue common objectives.  Also, corporate clothing is considered to be a highly acceptable method of rendering a distinction between levels of authority of those working at various levels of organizational  hierarchy, and role sets of those handling diverse jobs such as blue collar and white collar jobs.

Nevertheless, not many are convinced with the currently in vogue trend of sporting organization specified gear; they consider is disparaging. Their view is founded on beliefs that this acts as a mechanism that impedes, rather obliterating, creativity, and  promotes mental slavery and extreme reliance on following procedures, making people uneasy. Such an organization, as this lobby assumes, seldom sees productivity augmenting at every level, and is caught in procedural delays.

Despite the squabble about merits and demerits, the use of company defined attire code is a must in organizations that have specific role-sets such as armed forces, law enforcement agencies which help afford reassurance to citizens, and those which rely on public relations and outreach since the outfits of their personnel exude approachability and friendly attitudes.

In hindsight, wearing or foregoing a predefined ensemble has been eternally argued for ages though practice continues to thrive unabated, even in the modern emancipated world, in a new manifestation though. I feel it exudes unity, homogeneity and sense of obligation; thus, outshining alleged pitfalls.  

Global warming is one of the biggest threats humans face in the 21st Century and sea levels are continuing to rise at alarming rates. What problems are associated with this and what are some possible solutions.

Global warming is one of the biggest threats humans face in the 21st Century and sea levels are continuing to rise at alarming rates.

What problems are associated with this and what are some possible solutions.

Ielts Essay Global Warming 

Rapidly rising global temperatures are a growing menace and a major challenge for mankind in the contemporary times, for these have a potential to jeopardize human life. It is hence, a task of paramount importance to find a plausible mechanism to surmount this pressing problem.

The most prominent of the threats resulting from this phenomenon is an unprecedented increment in the levels of seawater due to rapidly melting glaciers and ice at poles. This has endangered the very existence of the coastal areas and cities like Mumbai, Sydney, Los Angeles and Singapore to name a few, which may be submerged under seawater in next few decades if the warming of the environment of the planet is not arrested right away.

Moreover, the impact of this occurrence would not stop here, as  more and more disastrous effects have become visible in the form of rapid climatic shifts and extreme weather patterns. More recently, extremely long summers with scorching heat in the tropical regions, and extended winters with temperatures dipping far below the freezing point are a new normal today. Similarly, droughts and inland flooding have become more frequent which were formerly unheard of.

The remedy for this perilous weather condition, nevertheless, lies with no one else but mankind, the primary force behind this catastrophic change. It is the need of the hour to immediately halt deforestation so that excessive release of carbon dioxide in the environment can be curtailed. Similarly, reducing dependence on fossil fuels for energy requirements would go a long way in cutting down emission of greenhouse gases.

Hence, undoubtedly global warming is casting an evil shadow on the very existence of humanity and the future of this planet. It is therefore extremely important to take remedial actions as soon as possible.

Nowadays online shopping is extremely popular. Discuss the impact of it on the environment and on people, who lost their jobs because of it.

Nowadays online shopping is extremely popular. Discuss the impact of it on the environment and on people, who lost their jobs because of it.

Ielts Essay E-Shopping

With more and more opting to shop online, shoppers are experiencing an unprecedented convenience both in terms of time and money. However, this not so old in vogue trend is impacting environment and people. In what ways does it influence both is a matter worth profound introspection.

Undeniably, ecommerce has been hailed as a boon for the environment since that latter is poised to reap rich benefits in long run if this trend gathers momentum. With a majority opting to shop online, they can now forsake the need to visit showrooms and  stores. This surely is bound to bring in colossal savings in terms of carbon emissions resulting from an ever-thinning traffic of shoppers and scaled-down operations of shops and ancillary activities.  

Moreover, the advent of this trend has a potential to stem the speed of deforestation. The dwindling number of  walk-ins of customers, making a beeline for shops, has resulted in a dramatic reduction in the requirement of new shopping malls and areas. Consequently, the town planners no more  need to develop new shopping infrastructure by denuding the planet, to cater to avid shoppers.

Nevertheless, online shopping has left several jobless, especially the skilled retail professionals needed to manage the showrooms, and intermediaries. E-portals forego the need to employ specialists in many trades, ranging from the ones designing showrooms, and professionals involved in arranging merchandise on floors to sales and marketing personnel to affect the sales. This has deprived them of their earnings; thus, exposing them to financial crisis and miseries.

In hindsight, controversies apart, ecommerce web portals are  there to stay, and in fact it is surely a good step that would afford a respite environment even though partial. The affected people would surely find a way to adapt themselves to this change. 

 It is better to save money than to spend it. How far do you agree with this statement? Is saving more important than spending in today’s world? Give reasons for your answer, and provide ideas and examples from your own experience. You should write at least 250 words

 

Ielts Essay - MOney saving 

In times when most  of the economies of the world are facing turmoil( unrest), many have resorted to spending frugally since they term it a crucial exercise for a safe future. However, some find it quite inappropriate to exercise restraint when it comes to using their financial resources. 

Not being spendthrift and investing in savings of various kinds is considered to be a prudent practice. This view is based on the fact that the future is always uncertain, and one can be exposed to emergencies and crisis, especially related to health at any point of time, in which case it may invite huge medical expenses. To negotiate such occurrences, one needs to have enough financial resources at ready disposal. Such relief is only possible if an individual uses his foresight and puts some of the income into creating a financial buffer.

Moreover, practicing thrift instead of liberal attitude when it comes to using money, also helps people to cushion their later life. It is a common perception that twilight years is a time when most have to lead a solitary life, or be without a job. At such times, every penny saved can prove to be a boon and afford all necessities.

Nevertheless, there are some who  feel that money is meant for consumption, experiencing the exploits of the hard work put in to earn it  rather than putting it aside for tomorrow. They feel that money is fast losing its value due to inflationary tendencies, and it may not fulfil the desires later, so one must utilize it to fetch pleasures today.

In hindsight, I opine sacrificing extravagance and putting money aside for the rainy days and bright future carries substance. Those who believe in being prodigal are short sighted and their prophecies should be overlooked.  

Many jobs at around the house are done manually, but could have been done by machines instead. What are the advantages or disadvantages of this? Give your opinion and include relevant examples.

Many jobs at around the house are done manually, but could have been done by machines instead. What are the advantages or disadvantages of this? Give your opinion and include relevant examples.

Ielts Essay Machine and Manual 

Modern times are associated with automation, in almost every walk of life, but some of the household work is still done by hands. People do not let the spoils of modern innovations interfere with certain tasks. This although may be having a lot of drawbacks, it carries some prominent positives too.

The most prominent benefit of not involving machines in household jobs is ensuring a close observation and control on the process, especially when cooking. Such jobs need careful observation and use of sensory organs, like olfaction. This also aids in maintaining uniqueness, like distinct recipes and list of ingredients used apart from the time required to monitor appropriate seasoning and administering of ingredients which can only be perfected with experience, and not by setting cooking timings on machines.

Similarly, there are certain tasks that are better done by hands rather than deploying some mechanized equipment to supersede human efforts. Work involving handling delicate  material and things cannot be entrusted to appliances, that do not know where to start from and where to stop. Using apparatus to wash clothes with delicate fibers and clean fragile things, that  are prone to damage and loss, can be an expensive affair.

However, doing work physically, costs both efforts and time. Many, today, are leading busy lives and adding up some household tasks to to-do lists at home can be tiring and stressful, and drain individuals of their energy, whereas using robotic appliances afford relief from tedious household work and use it instead on other more important jobs and besides relaxation.

To conclude, I opine doing certain tasks by using own efforts is having more benefits than drawbacks. This methods has been followed since time unknown and has assisted in perfecting skills and ensures qualitative outputs.

Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians. What are the reasons for this? Is it a positive or negative development?

Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians. What are the reasons for this? Is it a positive or negative development?

Ielts Essay Celebrities and Politicians 

Many celebrated people are earning way more than those involved in politics do. This can be attributed to various causes. However, this has sparked an unlikely but fierce argument over the impact of this, trying to arrive at the conclusion, about this having favorable or unfavorable consequences. 

Astronomical sums being grossed by noted figures in sports and various forms of art, which is relatively higher than what policy makers can make, has become possible due to wider mass appeal enjoyed by the former. Entertainment in all its manifestations has become a lucrative industry – due to globalization – that invites huge investments, often resulting in high remuneration for those associated with it, whereas politicians earn perks received from the government.

This, has been hailed as a beneficial phenomenon: many intending to earn fortune make a beeline for the glamour, while politics is left to those who believe that governance is not the forte of every one and earnings are not the criteria of a realm like this. Such people are devoted and inclined to serve the society, and out of their initiatives, they selflessly lead the their countrymen to prosperity. 

However,  this imbalance in earnings has caused an alarm among many. Money rules the roost and this aspect can make celebrities overwhelmingly more influential than the ruling executive. This can lead to chaos and many a times it has been observed that the former, enjoying mass appeal, force their way into the regime and influence decisions.

In hindsight, the influence and outreach of celebrated personalities is the prime source of sky-high earnings. I feel that although this might seem a little grim to some, it is in fact a favorable development  since this leaves only dedicated people in the fray to join politics and take up important public roles. 

Some people believe that it is better to get advice from old people compared to young people. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and include relevant examples.

Some people believe that it is better to get advice from old people compared to young people.

 Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 

Give your opinion and include relevant examples.

Ielts Essay Adviser - Young or Old 

When it comes to seeking advice, many seek it from a qualified individual. But, should the advisor be an elderly or a youth is a matter worth deep pondering. While some find the suggestions from the former more relevant, others vouch for the latter. 

Seeking counsel of the old has been a traditional practice through which the knowledge of various aspects connected to the social and family life, and sometimes even crucial inputs about professional matters have been passed down from one generation to the other. It is believed that the elderly garner an extensive exposure about various walks of life, by virtue of maneuvering through the thin and thick.  They carry a pragmatic vision can foresee the events before they actually happen.

This can be exemplified by the advisory offered by the elders of family to their young family members about upbringing up their offspring; managing money-matters; facing exigencies; resolving family disputes; choosing careers to pursue. Even today, the young  can be seen seeking guidance from their elders whenever a situation  arises.  

Nevertheless, a school of thought rallies behind the young advisors today. This view is based on the changed environment that is driven by technology and globalization.  The young are apt in the knowledge of use of modern methods and equipment, and they also carry an exhaustive experience of working in conjunction with people across the planet. Thus, they are equipped with appropriate knowhow about handling the things in the contemporary times.

To conclude, I feel controversies apart, advising is as a practice is more dependent on rational approach rather than the age. It is not necessary that suggestions of older people would always be correct and that sourced from the young would be erroneous. Thus, I fail to subscribe to the statement  

Some people think that music plays an important role in society. Others, however, disagree and say that music is merely a form of entertainment. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.

Some people think that music plays an important role in society. Others, however, disagree and say that music is merely a form of entertainment. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.

Ielts Essay Music USeful 

An unlikely debate seems to have ensued an unlikely debate over the usefulness of music where some hail it as pivotal to the mankind, others  considering it to be a simple a medium of letting off steam and enjoying leisure time and nothing more than that.

Music, in all its manifestations – be it intriguing distinct repertoires  of native genres, or more homogenous sounding currently popular transnational musical compositions – has helped mankind express their, indescribable in words, feelings. This has been aiding people in exhibiting exhilaration, affection, love, lust and valor; rousing devotion and patriotism; depicting and also overcoming melancholy. One wonders what the life be like if this form of art was not there, colorless and unexciting.

Moreover, this art form is considered to be a formidable tool to stay connected with native traditions, beliefs and culture. Wherever one may be, this medium through compositions, notes and melodies keeps reminding people of their cultural and ethnic origins when played during festivities, crisis and social gatherings to name a few. Besides this, it also helps recall the achievements of the ancestors with the help of ballads and folk songs. Thus, binding individuals to their socio-cultural background.

Many do not, however, feel that music has anything to do with productivity or usefulness. A noisy combination of strings, air blown instruments, weird sounding keyboards, and thumping percussion that does little to help humans besides causing nuisance when not required. People only use it to de-stress, reinvigorate, and obtain a healthy distraction from mundane, at other times, they can take people away from  their work.  

In hindsight, controversies apart, music has a great utility for humans in almost all spheres of life, often transcending the limits one can imagine. Thus, any argument against the it lacks substance.  

Modern lifestyles mean that many parents have little time for their children. Many children do not get as much attention from their parents as children did in the past. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Modern lifestyles mean that many parents have little time for their children. Many children do not get as much attention from their parents as children did in the past. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Ielts Essay - Parent and Time for Children 

Many today are trying to juggle between their professional, social and personal realms, due to which they are often found foregoing their important task: spending some time with their wards. This notion gains support from many quarters, while is quashed by some, saying that this is only a rare case.

Parents neglecting their young ones is a stark reality of the current times, as many propose. This assumption is based on the assessment of the way many are increasingly engaging in a continuous striving to attain professional ambitions of rising in the organizational hierarchy – to gain clout over their professional rivals – besides, attempting to earn appropriate rewards for their efforts to render all necessary comforts to their families. This aspect keeps them away and children are the biggest casualty.

Similarly, modern ways of successful living, as per some commentators rather heavily rely on social visibility – in order to facilitate expansion social and professional network and influence . One must allocate a major part of their leisure time to this activity which of course comes at the cost of the time one generally devotes to their offspring.

Nevertheless, many voice their dissent on the former opinion. They feel that despite people not allocating time every day to their children, they are always there by the side of their wards whenever there is a need arises. This can be exemplified by either of the parent taking days off to help young ones prepare for their exams, or visit their schools.

In hindsight, I do not concur that parents are giving their most important responsibility a miss since they are always present whenever their wards need them the most. This compensates for the time lost on the  daily basis.

Some people believe that women should be treated as equal to men when applying for a job with police or the military. Others think women are less suitable for this kind of job. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some people believe that women should be treated as equal to men when applying for a job with police or the military.

Others think women are less suitable for this kind of job.

 Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Ielts Essay Women in Combat Duties 

The debate on whether women should be allowed to work in law enforcement agencies and armed forces is quite charged. Many are in favor of allowing females to join active combat duties in police and military though others offer resistance on this issue.

Females have proven their worth on several battle fronts in the history of mankind, be it Joan of Arc, or be the Queens of Jhansi in India who led their armies, mostly composed of men from the front against the formidable foes. Thus, overlooking their candidature and depriving them of a chance to serve on such posts just because they are women would be quite unjust.

Nevertheless, women fighting along  with men has certain pitfalls. As it is suggested by many commentators, law enforcement agencies and armed forces require high fitness standards and need combatants to be agile, an area where men outstrip their women counterparts by miles, whether it is sneaking into or evacuating from enemy territory.  Various studies carried out to assess training programs reveal that mixed-gender units were sluggish while all male units in both police and army were quick in expediting their tasks.

Moreover, one can hardly deny the threats females may face when fighting it out on streets, or battlefields: they are vulnerable to sexual assault, in case they land among criminals or are captured by enemy forces. This could be catastrophic and devastating for the women on combat duties, and an embarrassment for the establishment that employs them. 

In hindsight, I strongly feel that the changing paradigm needs to reset the aspirations of the society. It is necessary to allow females to take up jobs in police and military - the traditional bastions of males. If given opportunities, the women will prove their birth.  

Some people suggest that bringing up children by the whole family including uncles, aunts and grandparents is better, rather than only by parents, but others disagree with this statement. Discuss and give your opinion and examples.

Some people suggest that bringing up children by the whole family including uncles, aunts and grandparents is better, rather than only by parents, but others disagree with this statement. Discuss and give your opinion and examples.

Ielts Essay Joint Family or Nuclear one 

In contemporary times, when nuclear families are a norm of the day, many often profoundly argue whether rearing children in a nuclear family is worthwhile, or it is more useful to let them grow in an extended family. 

Raising young ones in an extended family carries numerous benefits, as many social theorists suggest. These kinds of  family settings allow the children to not only know their parents but also familiarize themselves with their grandparents, uncles, aunts, and their cousins. This helps foster cohesive family identity and also lets the young minds get acclimatized with the traditions and cultures that have been passed down the generations. Thus, assisting in perpetuation of customs and rituals. Several studies have shown, where young individuals grow in a joint family are more closely connected to and are enlightened about their roots.

Moreover, joint family arrangement affords better monitoring of the tender minds. Many a time, children need disciplining, and at times moral support which can be ill-afforded by couples living away from their joint family environment. When others seniors are there to observe and counsel, mothers and fathers rarely need to worry about as they go around fulfilling their professional and social obligations.

Nevertheless, many favor non-extended family settings. As per them, children  growing up in nuclear family set-up  stay emotionally connected to  their fathers and mothers. This generally is seen as highly beneficial during ageing, as youngsters appreciate their responsibilities towards their parents and are in a better state to render care for old during the twilight years of the latter.

To conclude, even though the decision of bringing up young ones in a joint family or a nuclear one relies completely on people involved or the circumstance, child rearing can become more effective the former settings.

We have long imagined the possibility that life exists on other planets. Do you believe that there is life in the universe outside the earth? What would be the implications of proving that alien life exists? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examplea from your own knowledge and experience.

We have long imagined the possibility that life exists on other planets. 
Do you believe that there is life in the universe outside the earth? What 
would be the implications of proving that alien life exists?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.

IELTS ESSAY Space in Life 

The idea of life beyond the hospitable conditions of the planet earth has never failed to intrigue humans. One wonders what will happen the day humans are able to actually discover life in the outer space. This has also prompted many to ponder about impact such a revelation might have on human life back home.

There is a great likelihood of finding signs of life in the outer space somewhere. This view is enthusiastically supported by unofficial reports of UFO sightings. Many are quite optimistic about the day when extraterrestrial beings making an appearance and establishing contact with humans. Even the SETI scientists are sure that there are certain planets with life supporting conditions revolving around their stars.

Discovery of life beyond the habitable environment of the blue planet may help humans interact with the far more intelligent civilizations that might transfer their know-how of handling problems, like environmental deterioration and pollution which happen to be a pressing problem for the human race today. They could also teach  how to survive a nuclear holocaust in case mankind resorts to the use of atomic weapons.

Conversely, some are cynical about the proposed benefits. They feel even if signs of alien life are found, there is no surety that it will positively impact humans since communicating in a vast space might take several light years; however, by then the mankind would have been stripped off invaluable financial resources which could have been used to mitigate several problems.

To recap, the optimism concerning discovering aliens carries substance, and I personally opine despite doubts/ cynicism coming in contact with extra terrestrial life forms would surely help drive home a plethora of unprecedented benefits. Hence, it would be quite rational to keep looking for life in the space.

Disruptive school students have an negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately. Do you agree and disagree give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own experience and knowledge. Write at least 250 word.

Disruptive school students have an negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately. Do you agree and disagree give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own experience and knowledge. Write at least 250 word.

Ielts Essay Disruptive Children 

It is a common notion that pupils with unruly behavior should be segregated and educated in a different group. This, as per many, can prove to be beneficial not only for themselves but also for others. However, others contest this and feel that this might result in unwarranted outcomes.

Ones vouching for  classifying learners as per their conduct feel that such an arrangement will ensure that students who are devoted to their academic pursuits would be spared of troubles – becoming victims of pranks and bullying – and disruptions caused by their disorderly classmates who do little but cause a chaos due to their unsettling attitude. Clubbing all troublemakers can prevent academic progress from being impeded, and afford a conducive learning environment.   

Moreover, it is rightly said, "One rotten  apple spoils the barrel". Grouping ill-mannered pupils seems to be a practical solution that could help prevent other learners from going astray and following the precedents of their fellow learners.  It has quite often been observed that young learners by virtue of being tender-minded, inexperienced,  and inquisitive are often overwhelmed by  naughty conduct that appeals them.  

Having said that, several child psychologists openly deride this proposal. They feel that a segregation would defeat the fundamental purpose of the education: polishing the personalities of the learners rather than magnifying the personality defects of the young ones. Formal tuition renders subtle hints to all by letting students observe conduct of disciplined students passively. Is such an suggestion sees the light of day this may brand many as troublemakers, thereby turning them rebellious.  

Hence, despite many lending support to classification of students, I strongly detest this. In my view, this proposal is fraught/ laden/ loaded with numerous inconsistencies, and would do more harm than good to the learners. Thus, it would be practical to put such  proposal in the cold storage.

A staggering amount of food is wasted every year, both in business and households. Why is this happening? What can be done to tackle this problem? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.

A staggering amount of food is wasted every year, both in business and households. Why is this happening? What can be done to tackle this problem?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.

Ielts Essay Trashing The Food 

A startling phenomenon is being observed today that an increasing amount of food is ending up in the trash cans instead of satisfying hunger. This new development has many experts scampering for the root cause, as well as the practical way outs.

The most prominent of the causes behind this phenomenon is the indifferent attitude of buyers for whom shopping for things including eatables has become a desirable pastime. Whenever they visit markets and stores, they end up shopping mindlessly, and food being the cheapest and the most important merchandise always tops the shopping priorities. These items don the shelves and the racks of the household kitchens and refrigerators until they are spoiled or pass their expiry dates.

Moreover, consumer companies involved in selling edible goods are also partially responsible for this rising dumping of food. In order to establish their image as once selling high grade goods, especially fruits and vegetables, they tend to only select those individual pieces that have perfect shapes and are blemish less besides being in perfect color. Due to this the businesses discard even the slightly discolored, deformed and bearing a few marks without giving a second thought.

Nevertheless, this challenge can be surmounted by adopting certain prudent steps, like creating food banks and encouraging people and the organizations to donate the unwanted food for the good of the society, especially for the impoverished and the destitute. This way not only the have nots would get their nourishment but it would also prevent a critical resource from ending up in the landfill sites.

Hence, it is true that consumerism is fuelling  wasteful habits, people and businesses can be convinced to make a better use of the extra food they buy by sharing it with those who face the scarcity.

Some people believe that face to face communication is always more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and include relevant examples.

Some people believe that face to face communication is always more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and include relevant examples.

IELTS ESSAY  FACE TO FACE OR WRITTEN 

When it comes to communication, people have traditionally relied on both written form, as well as face to face meetings. However, it is often profoundly debated by different schools of thought whether one mode outshines the other.  

It is undeniable that man being a social animal has overwhelmingly relied on going over and meeting acquaintances, and discussing matters in person. This helps afford clarity and maintain cohesiveness, both in professional and social terms, in exchange of views and opinions. When people are seated in front of each other, they do not only use oral and verbal form but also non-verbal expressions to transmit their feelings and responses. A personal meeting aids in eliminating  ambiguity, and many a  times faster resolution of problems.

Moreover, meeting in person can cut down the time wasted in communication considerably. When people preside over in a meeting they experience an instant exchange of views. This spontaneity can rarely be had when individuals write emails, letters, blogs and articles to name a few. Since one does not have to wait for their counterparts to respond.

However, some vouch for the written form as a formidable means of communication.  Their opinion stems from the fact that whatever is transmitted in the form of texts can be recorded and retained permanently. In their view, agreements cannot be arrived upon unless ratified and endorsed in written or printed content. This is why most of the legal documents, contracts are printed on paper to make the claims and agreements valid. 

In hindsight, I partially concur with the given statement since both these mediums are used abundantly by everyone. Hence, it can be said, they complement each other rather than superseding.

Some think that radio is the best way to get news while other think that television is better for this purpose. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some think that radio is the best way to get news while other think that television is better for this purpose. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Ielts Essay - TV or Radio 

Radio and Television are undoubtedly most commonly used modes of mass communication, especially when it comes transmitting and receiving news. However, which medium is good for this task has evoked an eternal debate.

Many consider radio to be a more acceptable way of obtaining news about different happenings. Their view is based on the non-intrusive quality of this gadget. Listeners can know about the events and about the important updates while carrying out their other essential tasks simultaneously since they do not have to focus on either reading a newspaper; watching the visuals; or pay attention and look at someone talking to them.

Moreover, this humble twentieth century innovation has continued to gain favors even in the modern times due to its portability. By virtue of being able to run even on small batteries along with its small size, as small as a headphone receiver, radios in form of transistors, car stereos and as an attachment on mobiles continue to satisfy the craving of keen news hunters who must stay outdoors or even the remotest of the locations, and who can ill-afford to waste their time looking for a source of getting news. 

Nevertheless, there is a sizeable lobby that is more inclined to television as a source of news. Viewers are able to inform themselves comprehensively about the happenings world over, due to transmission of videos and pictures along with detailed reporting. People do not have to tax their imaginative powers in order to know something as everything can be seen on the TV screens.

To conclude, controversies apart, comparing television and radio as source of obtaining news is a mere squabble. Both of these innovations in mass communications address diverse audience though they sometimes complement each other too.   

Scientists have been warning for many years about protecting the environment and we must limit the use of energy in our daily lives. Despite warnings, many people do not do this. What are the reasons for that and how people can be encouraged to take an interest in protecting the environment?

Scientists have been warning for many years about protecting the environment and we must limit the use of energy in our daily lives. Despite warnings, many people do not do this. What are the reasons for that and how people can be encouraged to take an interest in protecting the environment? 

 

Ielts Essay Environment Warning and Remedies 

There is a growing concern that despite the doomsday forecasts about crisis posed by deterioration in the quality of environment by various environmentalists, no one seems to pay any heed. This indifference can be attributed to various reasons; however, the situation can be salvaged with prudent steps.

Human intent to make life better and comfortable, and the greed to prosper rapidly, in every sphere of life – be it farming, industry or even lifestyle –  is taking a toll on the nature. The continued tryst is like a mirage, an indefinite pursuit,  where humans seem to shift the goals forward after every achievement. Many do think about the environment, but  they always tend to assert that after enjoying the exploits of their achievements, they would shift focus to the environment protection measures, but unfortunately that rarely happens. 

On top of that, to add insult to injury, there is a complete absence of affordable alternatives – fuels, raw material and food to name a few, which makes it imperative for people to continue using whatever they have at their disposal. The technologies that have also been developed and could supersede the conventional natural resources are either in rudimentary form, or are extremely expensive to be commercially viable for mass use.

However, it is not too late to act. If governments respond judiciously by making stringent laws to curtail indiscriminate exploitation of natural resources besides promoting and subsidizing non-conventional resources and greener technologies, inhabitants of this planet can be forced, or persuaded to abandon their indifferent attitude and listen to what the mother nature wants them appreciate.

In hindsight, if strongly feel if the human society wakes up to the perils it is facing due to damage their activities are causing to this planet, the future generation might get to live in hospitable conditions.

Nowadays public transport prices are constantly increasing. Why do you think it is happening? How can this problem be solved?

Nowadays public transport prices are constantly increasing. Why do you think it is happening? How can this problem be solved?

 

Ielts Essay Public Transport Prices 

It is been observed nowadays that the accessing public transit systems are becoming dearer with every passing day. There are obvious reasons for this; however, the solutions are available on hand which could make this mode affordable.   

The primary reason for such an unprecedented increment in the facilitation charge of public mode of transit can be attributed to the ever rising population that needs to travel places. To render consistent efficient services to the growing number of users, continuous expansion and augmentation of the rail and bus networks has become a necessity. This exercise needs huge investments which cannot be funded single handedly by the government, by using money sourced from tax payers. Hence, to prevent chaos and crisis, some burden must be borne by commuters.

Moreover, the constantly changing technology has not either made the things easier for the authorities: it is imperative to focus on bringing around improvements in the methods, techniques being used in the mass transit systems. These enhancements would allow optimum utilization of resources and also improve the travelling experiences, but as said, these additions do not come for free. Thus, raising fares is inevitable.

Nevertheless, certain prudent steps can help bring down the cost of public transit. Distribution of load between different modes of transport, like roadways and trains could hold a viable solution. Establishing networks complimenting each other rather than competing could help a great deal. For instance, encouraging commuters to use trains for longer journeys and buses for the shorter ones could hold a key and make travelling by public transport relatively cheaper.

Hence, even though the rising public transport tariff   is no doubt a cause of worry, this can easily overcome provided some judicious planning is undertaken while assigning roles to different modes of transportation.