Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately. Do you agree and disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own experience and knowledge. Write at least 250 words.
Yes? Why
Doing this will help in creating a conducive learning environment for other studious pupils who will be able to focus on their studies
This will save the time of teachers and speed up the the teaching process
A different strategy will be be applied for different set of learner
This will protect others from negative influence - it is undeniable bad company has a deeper impact on young minds. “ A rotten apple spoils the barrel”.
No? Why
This will defeat the very objective of education:
the first aim of educating youngsters is to transform their personalities; and
Also remove differences between different people. This will create a permanent wedge between learners
The students being put in different classes because of their attitudes will start feeling abandoned and consider themselves as outlaws
This could have adverse impact on their personalities since instead of improving, they might go astray
To make schooling more effective, some suggest grouping undisciplined students separately from their studious counterparts since the former are likely to have adverse impact on the latter. This essay will analyze this suggestion and emanate a justified conclusion whether this policy should be deployed, or not.
To begin with, clubbing obstinate pupils and teaching them separately is based on the assumption that this arrangement can do wonders as it will aid in creating a productive and valuable learning environment for the disciplined ones who will be able to focus on their learning without distractions. Moreover this will help save teachers an ample amount of time and speed up the process of delivering lessons. Also, undeniably, as it is said “a rotten apple spoils the barrel”, bad company always has a detrimental impact on the disciplined lot, and has potential to inspire others to emulate such behavior.
On the other hand, despite bringing some benefits, such settings could prove to be highly unfavorable; it is likely to defeat the whole purpose of education. The primary objective of formal tuition is to transform personalities, and also help young minds distinguish between the good and bad. Applying this norm will leave troublesome pupils feeling abandoned and considering themselves as outlaws, leading to adversely impacting their mental health and attitude, and making them go astray, even persuading them to abandon continuing with schooling. Likewise, they will miss the chance of learning about transforming themselves and altering their attitudes from their studious classmates.
To conclude, applying this strategy will fetch several pitfalls in the long run; whatever benefits this promises, are short-termed, and are likely to have enduring ramifications: schools are places to churn out polished individuals, and not denigrate them for their foibles. Thus, this proposal should be shelved.
