SEARCH YOUR ESSAY

Tuesday, May 21, 2019

Nowadays people can buy a large variety of household goods, more than ever before in most countries in the world. Is this a good or bad development? Give your opinion and examples.



Nowadays people can buy a large variety of household goods, more than ever before in most countries in the world. Is this a good or bad development? Give your opinion and examples.
Nowadays people can buy a large variety of household goods
Ielts Essay Household Goods 


Easy accessibility of household commodities, world over, has ensued a debate of sorts between various schools of thought over the impact of this new development on individuals, society, economy, as well as the environment. While some term this as a highly beneficial trend, others see it as negative.

Baring a few, most hail this phenomenon: such facilitation is stimulating growth of consumerist economies by boosting economic productivity. When people buy something they need as per their convenience, they aid in invigorating sales of consumer goods; thereby spurring demand for higher production, and hence, employment. Consequently, money flows increase in the economy in form of salaries, and contribute to economic prosperity with higher purchasing power.

Moreover, this not so old trend is helping drive home a huge  indirect benefit, in form of blurring differences between the haves and have-nots. Domestic commodities are no more novelties. They are available in variable quality and prices, and can be afforded by all, regardless of economic background; thus eliminating any chance of jealousy between  diverse and different income groups: everybody is able to enjoy the goods they desire for.

However, conveniently available goods are casting an evil shadow on the environment, as many propose. People buying domestic items, at their convenience, is contributing to an ever-rising pollution not only through manufacturing but also the use, and indiscriminate use of natural resources. Any increment in demand for commodities must be complimented by an increase  in production; thus predisposing natural resources to mindless exploitation; and use of fuel for processing; thus churning out massive emissions.   

To conclude, controversies apart, this development is a positive development with everybody being able to access household articles: it is helping economies and removing disparities. However, there is a need to address environmental concerns too.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts subjects, like philosophy and history, and only offer practical degrees. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts sub...