Nowadays
newspapers publish information about private lives of individuals. Some people
think the government should maintain certain control over the information that
gets published, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own
opinion. Write at least 250 words.
 |
| Ielts Essay Press Freedom Of late newspapers have been making private lives of people public. This has prompted certain sections to propose a strict control on what can be disclosed to audience and what not even though there are some who believe that such a move by the government is unnecessary. |
Those vouching for censuring the content revealing
intricate personal lives, feel that press and newspapers have no right to
encroach the private space of people even if they are celebrities and noted
public figures. Every individual enjoys this fundamental right and anybody
trespassing this privilege should be inhibited. Governments being the
controlling bodies should guarantee this right to every citizen, regardless of
their status in the society.
Moreover, paparazzi has been a cause a distress and extreme consequences
in certain cases. Their hot pursuit of
people, in order to extract details about their private lives, has ruined many.
People attribute family disputes, legal separations, and even bereavement to
these investigative journalists. This can be illustrated by the death of
Princess Diana in a car mishap that was an outcome of a press photographer
chasing her and her friend.
Having said that, a lobby vehemently defends the rights of reporters
and citizens to know, and make the private lives of individuals public,
especially of celebrated personalities and politicians. These key public
figures, through their actions, influence their followers, critics other common
people profoundly, negatively or positively. With the reporters bringing forth
information about how noted individuals
behave and deal with situations behind the veil of privacy, can either inspire
or caution others.
To conclude, I personally feel, despite the
fact that freedom should be rendered to press to peek into private lives,
certain limits should be defined, and caution must exercised on what can be
brought forth.
