Some teachers think that a program of international exchange visits would benefit all teenage school students. Do you think the benefits of such a program would outweigh any disadvantages?

Some teachers think that a program of international exchange visits would benefit all teenage school students. Do you think the benefits of such a program would outweigh any disadvantages?

 

Ielts Essay International Students Exchange Programs

A prominent lobby of teaching fraternity extols achievements of international exchange programs offered to teenage school students citing several advantages, nonetheless, this does not prevent the critics from pointing out at the weaknesses of such schemes. 

Such programs, as per the supporters, renders unparalleled opportunities to the adolescent students – the citizens of the future, who would populate a globalized village that is fast evolving due to globalization – to explore diversity and broaden their mindsets and perspectives. When the teenaged pupils visit other countries as a part of such schemes, the mingle and interact with their counterparts in host nations, which helps foster understanding between young individuals of diverse nationalities, ethnicities, and cultures, resulting in a pleasant bonhomie; thus raising hopes for a bright future of humanity that emanates harmony.

Moreover, such once in a lifetime experience afford students possibilities to explore, analyze, compare and appreciate disparate education systems of countries they visit; and determine strengths and benefits. Students can carry this knowledge back home, and make improvements in the their own learning. They can also share this knowledge with their classmates, and thus bring benefits for the society too.  

However, the detractors openly deride these schemes as expensive propositions that tax parents financially. Traveling to other  countries needs huge investments to fund outward and inward airfares, boarding and  lodging expense, and other sundry expenditure, which must be borne by the families. Consequently, this puts an immense financial pressure on parents who often find it hard to cope up. 

In a nutshell, controversies apart, international student exchange programs may carry certain drawbacks, having said that, humungous benefits derived out of such schemes can hardly be ignored, considering that the world is fast transforming a global village, such events could prove to be worthy mediums of promoting homogeneity. 

Some people believe that physical fitness of strong individuals and teams is the reason for most sports achievements. Others, however, think that mental attitude is more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some people believe that physical fitness of strong individuals and teams is the reason for most sports achievements. Others, however, think that mental attitude is more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

 

Ielts Essay Physical Fitness 

Players and teams battle it out in an arena to overwhelm each other in every quarter of a game, but what helps ensure success: is it robust physique or mental resilience? This topical issue is nowadays being profoundly debated, as people stand poles apart.

Sound  health is considered to be a key to success in any sporting discipline. Established experts assert, only players with immense physical strength and robustness possess stamina to outlast rivals in a duel; bear stress of physical exertion; respond to challenges from players of opposition, thus giving team members an upper hand over rival teams; resist attacks; and implement counter moves. Sportsmen and  women who tire out soon seldom realize their potential, and eventually face set-backs.

Moreover, being in good physical condition helps ensure continuity; and hence performance. Sports personnel or teams marred by injuries often find it hard to sustain winning streak. Players  plagued by injuries and ailments often find their way out of teams, and are seldom retained. Likewise, it has, quite often, been observed that even good teams face debacles: some of their best players sat on benches on account of some injuries, or being sick.

                         

However, it will be too naive to ignore the role of mental readiness of players: this defines their approach towards a game. Where sports personnel with an optimistic perspective tend to not only turn the tables on their rivals but also snatch a game, that was as good as lost; they are able to observe opponents keenly; respond to situations; and plan their  moves, while ones with a pessimistic approach tend concede defeat without a fight.

To conclude, comparing these inseparable components of success is like descending into an unnecessary squabble. Players are trained to be physically fit and mentally resilient.  

Nowadays in many countries young people leave rural areas to study or work in cities. Is it a positive or negative development? Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?

Nowadays in many countries young people leave rural areas to study or work in cities. Is it a positive or negative development? Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?

 

Ielts Essay Youth MIgrating to Cities 

As more and more youth relocate from villages to urbanized locations, social theorists seem to be getting uneasy for this movement present a big challenge though some  also see it brighter side of this trend.

Migration of youth from villages to urbanized locations is undoubtedly a favorable development. The young educated generation of rural areas is able to pursue dreams of seeking enhancement in their living standards, of course which can only be easily afforded by big cities: these locations have an abundance of opportunities for good higher education, and also handsome paying employment openings

Nonetheless, the rising influx of rural youth into urban areas is laden with multiple problems: cities receiving these migrants, are already bursting to the seams, and have scanty space for anymore. Shifting of more is precipitating chaos on multiple fronts: already over-taxed city infrastructures, are over-burdened, which is causing monumental predicaments: absence of proper housing, roads to accommodate traffic, etc.,  This is having an unfavorable effect on the quality of life in cities.  

Furthermore, movement of rural young to big towns and metropolitans is creating a deep scarcity of able-bodied workforce in agricultural and other primary sector activities. Absence of people in appropriate numbers is severely hampering productivity of primary sector, which in-turn is impacting rural economies adversely. This has a potential to engender a food shortage in the country itself; thus making it hard for not only residents of rural areas to get food, but also present a challenge to the inhabitants of the cities as well.

In a nutshell, everyone has a right to seek prosperity, which in current times can only be afforded by big metropolis; hence despite numerous failings, migration of rural young to non-rural areas offers several benefits. 

Some people think that the advantages of advertising sports products through famous sports players outweigh the disadvantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people think that the advantages of advertising sports products through famous sports players outweigh the disadvantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 

Ielts Essay Sportes Advertisements 

Advertisements  of sports goods featuring popular players has always evoked profound debates: some considering this practice to be practical and is laden with numerous benefits, while others openly deride it asserting that this carries a plethora of drawbacks. 

Advertising sporting merchandise using well-known sports personnel is believed to be highly beneficial. This helps popularize sports disciplines, with which the goods being promoted are associated, especially among young generation and sports enthusiasts. It is well known that sports is considered a medium of not only promoting good health, but also generating rich employment opportunities – by inspiring people to take up this activity as their professions. When successful sports practitioner endorse products, the message is carried rapidly and clearly to the intended audience.

Moreover, such a policy helps manufacturers of sporting goods and equipment a great deal by enabling them to create a distinct identity in a particular sports segment, they are dealing in. Using popular faces associated with  specific sports tends to provide a launch pad for marketing sporting kits, apparel, etc. related to that discipline. In this way, companies involved in producing products for a distinct domain can save time and money by directly engaging the targeted markets.

However, the critics are quick to point out failings of this method they call it quite unfair in terms of catapulting sports followers and admirers into buying sporting goods needlessly. People end up buying something they have little use for, thus creating social wastage: buyers try to ape their ideals and in the process they literally throw away their money.

In a nutshell, critics will be critics, the gains obtained through use of famous sporting personalities clearly outshine any pitfalls; hence this practice should be continued and promoted instead.  

People who read for pleasure have better imagination and language skills than those who prefer watching TV. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?

People who read for pleasure have better imagination and language skills than those who prefer watching TV. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?

 

Ielts Essay Reading and Watching Television 

An eternal argument  has always raged about whether imagination and linguistic skills are bolstered by carrying out reading as a part of leisure, or by watching television. The partisan groups cite their reasons for support of their opinion. 

Reading has existed since time unknown, and has been more readily accepted by humans as a medium of stimulating  fascination and eventually visualization of written content. Written words are a formidable mean of fostering creative skills: the readers are inspired, or rather forced to develop a visual image of the content being accessed, which brings forth creativity, and people are able to comprehend exhaustive information and message being transferred by writers.

Moreover, skimming and scanning text in free time is known to be a good way of boosting lexical resource, and knowledge about expressing applying disparate sentence structures. When people read any text, they are not only able to develop an understanding of deeper nuances and subtleties, or contextual meaning of each word and phrase but also learn to express and convey their feelings and opinions using a variety of verbal forms of communication.

However, supporters of television fuelling imagination and strengthening linguistic skills propose that human brain tends to be more receptive to graphical content. When people watch TV programs, they avail an opportunity of not only looking at the things from the perspective of commentators or speakers, but also develop an independent opinion; thus broadening creativeness. Similarly, they also learn to use language effectively with aid of verbal and non-verbal content. 

To conclude, controversies apart, despite reading being a traditional method of encouraging imaginative and linguistic skills, television offers no less enriching experience. Thus, it will be quite unjust to say that television viewers are outshined by readers in the realms of creativity and language.  

Some people think that zoos are cruel and all the zoos should be closed. However,other people think that zoos are useful to protect the rare animals. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some people think that zoos are cruel and all the zoos should be closed. However,other people think that zoos are useful to protect the rare animals. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

 

Ielts Essay Zoos Boon or Bane 

Zoological parks have always invited wrath of detractors as they terms these places as illegal and impractical, however,  certain naturalists find these locations quite practical. Both partisan groups cite their reasons in support of their views.

Zoos, as per proponents, provide  a safe refuge to conserving near extinct species, in the times when illegal hunting and poaching are at their peak – that has cause disappearance of some of the rarest  animals from the face of the planet. These places despite confining wild beings into cages and enclosures, they help keep the poor beings safe and instead run breeding programs that help bolster dwindling populations of endangered wild life.

Moreover, zoological parks do not only offer a healthy entertainment to the people but also act as a potential source of informing them, especially children - the future citizens, about the critical importance of animals and birds in maintaining the ecological balance of the planet.  The  subtle message passed along with amazing experiences helps enlighten people about the diversity of life on the Earth, and inspire them to involve in protecting the natural habitats and contain illegal hunting.

Nevertheless, critics will be critics: they always tend to rouse the most sensitive emotions of humans by terming these locations as illegal confinements, which many resent. Zoos all over the world subject animals and birds to an unwarranted torture by locking them up in small enclosures: distorting their natural life cycles. Even the nutrition rendered is unlike what these beings would afford in their natural habitats: cumulatively these factors adversely affect mental and physical well-being.

In a nutshell, controversies and derision apart, zoos have a great functionality in the current times, when planet is being denuded and wild beings being killed. Hence, all the criticism should be side-lined and zoos must be promoted.

Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 

Ielts Essay Homogeneous and Heterogeneous 

Nowadays, a profound debate is doing rounds in sections of academicians, historians and  politicians, whether museums and art galleries should focus on native history and culture – of their own country, or should they also present work of other countries. I completely reject the view and vouch for these places representing all work, regardless of geographical and political boundaries. 

Proponents of museums and galleries portraying only distinct local work discourage diluting it by including exhibits from other parts of world. The primary objective of museums is to promote local artists – in various fields – and their achievements, expressions and creations. It is necessary to sustain unique identity, so that the native future generations can learn about their own past; appreciate it, and perpetuate those values.

Moreover, these locations and facilities have a novelty value, and are frequented by curious alien  tourists, who come there to experience diversity of a society and not homogeneity, which they can experience elsewhere too. Thus, if the museums and art galleries don a global look and present specimen of other civilizations, they will lose their attraction, and the primary objectives will be lost.

However, the lobby that strongly rallies behind museums and galleries showcasing work from all over the world, consider idea of distinctiveness as obsolete. In an era, when humanity has left behind its history, is globalizing; and is achieving new feats – in terms of technology in confluence with each other, etc., it is practical to moot the idea of allowing these locations to represent sculptures and art from all over the world under one roof.

Henceforth, museums and galleries should focus on artistic expression from all over the planet, it can be said that future belongs to humanity in harmony, and not to some unique civilizations that harbor tribal attitudes.

The vacation areas in the city should be used for constructing buildings instead of plantation trees. Do you agree or disagree ?Iel

The vacation areas in the city should be used for constructing buildings instead of plantation trees. Do you agree or disagree ?

 

Ielts Essay on use of Idle areas 

How to use vast swathes of land lying idle in metropolis has, of late, become a matter of profound debate. While some favor building on these areas, others prefer to let these be maintained as green belts.

On one hand, proponents of building on vacant land parcels suggest, in an era, where big cities are experiencing a severe shortage of space, maintaining free spaces, that could be used to accommodate city dwellers and businesses, would be a waste of resources. This would exacerbate an already deteriorating  quality of life in urban areas. This might also result in population shifting to areas outside big cities, which would predispose and proliferate ecological disasters to other areas.

On the other, environmentalists vehemently rally behind sustaining free areas in their pristine condition, and suggest these should instead be populated with more trees: these green pockets act as lungs of cities and help mitigate pollutions levels. Several studies elucidate that trees help in absorbing and storing carbon dioxide – a major greenhouse gas – and  other suspended effluents in the environment. Denuding vacant parcels would also lead to loss of precipitation – green areas attract moisture, and hence rains.

Moreover, green buffers act as a refuge that offers respite to stressed out  city inhabitants - subjected to braving a life in alleys of concrete jungles. Urban sprawl has embraced most areas and has transformed every lane into a tarmac covered surface which is heightening stress. Green buffers offer peaceful surroundings, with idyllic beauty, and render opportunities to escape mundane, and relax.

In a nutshell, replacing green areas with built up structures would surely invite more trouble for none other than mankind. After all, environment can survive without humans, but humans would find hard to live on a hostile planet bereft of hospitable conditions.