The vacation areas in the city should be used for constructing buildings instead of plantation trees. Do you agree or disagree ?Iel

The vacation areas in the city should be used for constructing buildings instead of plantation trees. Do you agree or disagree ?

 

Ielts Essay on use of Idle areas 

How to use vast swathes of land lying idle in metropolis has, of late, become a matter of profound debate. While some favor building on these areas, others prefer to let these be maintained as green belts.

On one hand, proponents of building on vacant land parcels suggest, in an era, where big cities are experiencing a severe shortage of space, maintaining free spaces, that could be used to accommodate city dwellers and businesses, would be a waste of resources. This would exacerbate an already deteriorating  quality of life in urban areas. This might also result in population shifting to areas outside big cities, which would predispose and proliferate ecological disasters to other areas.

On the other, environmentalists vehemently rally behind sustaining free areas in their pristine condition, and suggest these should instead be populated with more trees: these green pockets act as lungs of cities and help mitigate pollutions levels. Several studies elucidate that trees help in absorbing and storing carbon dioxide – a major greenhouse gas – and  other suspended effluents in the environment. Denuding vacant parcels would also lead to loss of precipitation – green areas attract moisture, and hence rains.

Moreover, green buffers act as a refuge that offers respite to stressed out  city inhabitants - subjected to braving a life in alleys of concrete jungles. Urban sprawl has embraced most areas and has transformed every lane into a tarmac covered surface which is heightening stress. Green buffers offer peaceful surroundings, with idyllic beauty, and render opportunities to escape mundane, and relax.

In a nutshell, replacing green areas with built up structures would surely invite more trouble for none other than mankind. After all, environment can survive without humans, but humans would find hard to live on a hostile planet bereft of hospitable conditions.