"Failure is proof that the desire was not strong enough", To what extend do you agree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer?
 |
| Desire,Success and Failure |
Accomplishment and flops have
been defined as basic parameters of human life. Where the former is considered a crtical indicator of dedication and persevarence, the latter is often attribited to missing resolve. Thus, it remains a million dollar question, whether this perception holds substance, or not.
The school of thought specifically
feels that success is propelled by obsession and a strong vision.
Those seeking accomplishment must have a deep passion to
strive for reach objectives, and tend to invest best of their efforts in
each phase of their endeavor, and go to any limit to ensure that
the end result is as per the expectations, whereas paucity of resolve to
continue under hardships and see the work through results in complacency which
ultimately ends in disaster.
However, some present
strong arguments to counter popular beliefs of links between setbacks and deficient of resolve, and assert that missing achievements cann hardly be regarded as an
indicator of dearth of passion and ambition. Not being able to garner success is
merely a coincidence, and failng is more or less linked to destiny, and sometimes other circumstances beyond the control of many.
On top of that, many experts feel
that if the desire and ambition could guarantee success then people, like Napoleon
and Hitler would never have failed, for both these men aspired to dominate the
world. As per the experts, to succeed, one needs to take correct and well-informed decisions, and timely actions, besides possessing an attitude to win.
In conclusion, it can be said that desire, and lack of triumph are two different quantities altogether, so it cannot be said ones missing their goals face absence of resolve to attain something; there are factors underpinning achievement of goals.
