Nuclear energy is
a better source of power for today’s global energy needs. To what extent do you
agree or disagree? - Ielts Essay
 |
| Ielts Essay - Nuclear Energy |
Times have been changing andwith it the demand for energy has been consistently rising. To fulfill rising energyrequirements some experts bat for use of atomic energy as a convenient mediumfor resolving long term issue of growing power needs, although, there are somepeople who are completely against use of nuclear energy as power generationmedium.
The lobby that advocates use
of atomic energy as a permanent power generation medium feel that the needs of
humanity in terms of power is rising considerably and resources with capability
and capacity of fulfilling the rising demand is decreasing. With lesser viable resources
available for electricity generation, experts have started leaning towards use
of fission technology for producing electricity. They feel that nuclear energy offers
long term solutions as this technology does not require a consistent supply of
fuel to create power and an atomic power generation facility can operate for
years together after going critical.
Besides being a long term
option, atomic power generation is a feasible alternative that can go a long
way in reducing pollution which is generated during electricity generation
because of use of fossil fuels like coal and petroleum etc. It can also help in
preventing ecological disasters due to reduction in need to construct dams to assist
hydel power generation.
On other hand, some people vehemently
protest against use of nuclear technology because they feel that this
technology is dangerous and can threaten the very existence of life on earth. They
are often found quoting Chernobyl and Japanese reactor accidents which have threatened
the ecological balance of large areas that surround these reactor facilities.
In conclusion, I feel that
although nuclear technology presents a permanent solution for power generation,
but the dangers it poses must not also
be overlooked.
