Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students should be encouraged to question and offer criticisms on their teachers. Others think this will lead to a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

 Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students should be encouraged to question and offer criticisms on their teachers. Others think this will lead to a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

 

It has been suggested by many experts that secondary school learners should be rendered some liberty to question their tutors as this could help in better learning, but nonetheless others argue that this is likely to prove counterproductive, so this practice should not be permitted.

Nowadays,  many have been contesting that learners in secondary schools should be rendered some latitude to challenge their tutors. Nonetheless, others dissent with this notion and suggest that this might make classroom management a difficult task. 

The  suggestion for affording freedom to pupils to criticize and quiz teaching staff gains support from the assumption that this would make school education more meaningful. Pupils are on the verge of graduating to higher studies where they are likely to encounter a plethora of content and diverse teaching attitudes, and providing them with this privilege at school would fuel their courage and propensity to challenge something they do not comprehend well. 

Moreover, those rallying behind this idea also profess that this would also help learners to clarify their doubts from the faculty on the issues they usually stumble across during lessons, but choose to remain silent fearing retribution and ridicule from the latter, making education more interactive and interesting for all. Similarly, the teaching professionals would also get an opportunity to make adjustments in their imparting strategies and corrections in their attitudes. 

However, despite the former opinion being hailed as progressive, its impact will result in unwarranted consequences and the implementation of this proposal will backfire. The advantage of such an arrangement will surely be taken by unruly students, using the opportunity to clarify their doubts as a pretext to undermine teachers and disrupt the proceedings of the class. Additionally, this will also dampen the confidence and spirit of tutors and interfere with their task of disseminating knowledge effectively. 

Overall, I strongly feel that the scholastic environment needs those getting education to be disciplined and also respect those providing them with knowledge. Nevertheless, allowing such a system to prevail will kill the very objective and meaning of schooling.