Some people think the government should subsidize food and vegetables to make healthy food cheaper. Others argue that tax should be set on unhealthy food. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Whether the authorities should make farm produce affordable, or impose levies on junk food, is a matter of profound debate. The following paragraphs shall delve deeper into this matter and share a plausible stand.
A prominent school of thought asserts additional cost in terms of tax, duty and excise, to name a few, should be implied on fast food such that people would limit its consumption. Growing numbers are consuming these without considering its nutrition values and detrimental impact on wellbeing. Thus, making these products expensive may encourage the populace to alter their eating habits and circumvent problems, like obesity, diabetes, and so on. Such a situation was witnessed in Jamaica last year, when the federal government imposed an additional sugar tax on soft drinks, leading to a drastic drop of 67% in the intake, and mitigating health issues, as well. Thus, the healthier food is, the lesser the incidence of disease.
Nevertheless, others propound that healthier products such as vegetables, fruits, and many more are vital for bolstering immunity and can be promoted by allowing subsidies and allowances. Many would abandon the consumption of gluten loaded nutrition since fresh food would be available at a reasonable price. As per human behaviorists, although most find it overwhelming while coping with cooking fresh food and career obligations, they would still do it, for they will be saving some money. This persuasion will gradually evolve into a habit and many will be unwilling to switch to outside food, thereby rendering an enduring solution.
Overall, although raising the price for unhealthy food would directly reduce its market share, it can be asserted that reducing the price for healthy food would be an appropriate solution since many would incline towards this and leading to a fit society.
