Some people believe that physical fitness of strong individuals and teams is the reason for most sports achievements. Others, however, think that mental attitude is more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

 Some people believe that physical fitness of strong individuals and teams is the reason for most sports achievements. Others, however, think that mental attitude is more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Physical fitness  and mental attitude is important for everyone, but there is a profound controversy about what can fetch success in sports as some believe that it is physical robustness, while  others think it is the strong perseverance that makes a sports practitioner triumphant. I would like to discuss both the views in the below paragraphs. 

To start with, a physically fit person can invest himself completely in the sport to achieve victory. Their performance looks extraordinary, when they possess stamina to endure the stress of a game. Therefore, they have to focus on their physical abilities. For example, in a cricket match a team almost near to victory faced a defeat due to their outstanding players being either tired or injured.  

 

On the other hand, a strong resolve is equally important to physical fitness, as if a sports person is not able to concentrate on the game, they cannot strategies and time their actions well, adn as a result they - if they playing an individual sport, or  the whole team - if it a team sport -  suffers. Positive attitude is thus  needed in the game to achieve the goal. It has been often experienced that while performing in demanding conditions - such as facing nail biting finish, trying to live up to expectations of the fans, or playing against a strong rival - many buckle under pressure and tend to fail at crucial junctures, and bow out cheaply. This  has often been experienced across various sporting disciplines where the best players could not perform due to this stress. 

In the end, I would like to conclude that it is mandatory to be fit both mentally and physically.both are equally important to the team to achieve a goal .A positive attitude towards the game and a body fit player can only make a good difference in the game.

The performance of staff can have a significant impact on the success of a company. What can companies do to increase staff productivity?

 The performance of staff can have a significant impact on the success of a company. What can companies do to increase staff productivity?

Employees are an asset to the company since their efforts guarantee productivity and profit; therefore, it is essential to ensure that they remain motivated to churn out continuous improvements. There are several methods that can help attain such goals.   

To begin with, the workplace and the working conditions should be appropriate. Businesses should provide a safe and conducive work environment with adequate facilities - that can let workers be mentally and physically content, clean washrooms, proper lighting and cafeterias as comfortable surroundings can prevent workers from getting distracted. This, as a consequence, can bolster their focus on work and let them deliver excellent outcomes.  

Moreover, organizations should render assurance about job security: this will offer a sense of security to the personnel about their future and they  will be able to devote their energy towards enhancing their performance. Also, other non-monetary inducements such as  health and medical support for the employees and their families can also be considered as an appropriate way of making sure that they remain committed to their work goals since such things will augment their feeling of belongingness to the organization. 

Apart from that, the most commonly used method that has been termed as a panacea for boosting the morale of the workforce and persuading them to work harder is the financial stimulus. Undoubtedly, everyone works for the sake of money, and if they can obtain more than they usually earn - in the form of performance-based incentives,  bonuses and increments, they feel motivated and  encouraged to invest all their energy in helping their employers achieve unprecedented heights.  

Overall, it is the sweat and blood of employees which helps companies to reach heights. Therefore, the staff productivity should be increased by keeping the workers motivated by appreciating their work and productivity.

In many cities today, most people live in large apartment blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages?

 

In many cities today, most people live in large apartment blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages?

 

Advantages of living in large apartment blocks 

• A closely knit community tha afford opportunities for people to celebrate festivals and events together 
• Convenient life in these gated areas: all facilities are available are within close vicinity 
• No hassles for parking 
• Round the clock power back up and water 
• Unmatched security for dwellers 
• Cost-effective living since cost of maintenance is shared by all
• Peaceful atmosphere 

Disadvantages of living in large apartment blocks 

• Lack of privacy 
• No alterations possible - exterior or interior - without permission 
• No access to rooftop terrace 

In contemporary times, living in large gated societies has become a fad among many. This kind of dwelling is although abound with several comforts, there are certain shortcomings  unworthy of being ignored.

The most prominent benefit afforded by these dwelling units that are generally in gated societies is unprecedented stress free lifestyle: those residing in these locales are exposed to availability of every imaginable facility closeby, mostly within the walls of gated regions such as shopping arcades, community centers, clubs and gyms, to name a few, making these easily accessible. One cannot also deny that the environment built is also quite comfortable and healthy, a great care is taken to create  green surroundings by planting numerous trees and building parks for residents, so that they can spend some time in the midst of greenery: playing; taking  a stroll; or socializing with neighbors, offering unmatched pleasures of life.  

Moreover, security is another factor that makes these locations most sought after since the entry gates of such blocks are manned by security personnel who keep a close vigil on the area, monitoring the visitors and also the vendors who frequent societies for supplying material, offering a reliable protection to all; especially women, children and the elderly.

However, a major pitfall that sometimes  mars those residing in such neighborhoods is absence of privacy. It is always essential to keep in mind the comfort and likes and dislikes of neighbors, and follow the common norms such as not organizing noisy parties in their homes; and refrain from altering layouts of their houses without obtaining due permission from society management.

Overall, despite choosing to live in apartments in housing societies having certain pitfalls, the advantages these offer are unparalleled, and in fact, outshine the former.

 

Parents and family background have more influence than teachers of a young person’s learning and academic achievement. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 Parents and family background have more influence than teachers of a young person’s learning and academic achievement. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In contemporary times, the learning, and academic performance of the young generation is much more influenced by their parents and family background than teachers. Formal institutions are the source of guidance, but cannot assure the same is being understood by the learners. This notion is concured with completely extent and will be discussed in this essay.

Youngsters spend more time at educational institutions and have numerous things to learn in a limited period of time. Within the span of a few hours, they have to cover their academic syllabus along with other extracurricular activities. They are seeking knowledge at formal tuitions and are not able to grasp all things at the same time. At home, parents provide them knowledge in comfortable methods with better understanding.

Moreover, as per the current scenario of pandemic, pupils are at home and seeking online classes and are more in touch with their mothers and fathers. Tutors at formal institutions have to pay attention to many learners at the same time. On the flip side, families have to guide only their offspring and are capable of dealing with them successfully. 

Similarly,  people are aware about the strengths and weaknesses of their children and can tackle them accordingly. As per the survey done by the students at the University of Toronto, it was found that those learners, who were tutored by their parents and are not attending any formal tuitions, performed better than those opting for schooling due to the busy schedule of their parents.

To conclude, the young generation is more impacted by their family environment as they spend more time with their elders and excel personally and academically, which cannot be provided by a formal tutor due to limited time span and formal relationship.

Some people believe that the culture will be ruined if it is used to earn tourism revenue. Others believe that tourism is the only way to protect the culture. Discuss both the sides and give your opinion.

 Some people believe that the culture will be ruined if it is used to earn tourism revenue. Others believe that tourism is the only way to protect the culture. Discuss both the sides and give your opinion. 

Showcasing culture as a part of tourism to gain financial returns has become a subject of intense criticism since many fear  that this might lead to traditions losing their authenticity even though there are differing views from other sections who assert that this is the only way to preserve ways of life.  

To start with, every country is trying to introduce its customs to the world. This seems to be the only way to preserve native beliefs since due to the invasion by other dominant cultures in the globalization, it is perceived that now portraying and promoting own customs, that is only possible by letting tourists observe them, can help a society sustain its distinct identity, otherwise it might be blown away in the current era. Besides this, this sector can afford abundant financial resources for sustenance of rich heritage. When travellers arrive they pay to observe various practices and monuments, which generates money and allows those practising the art and the edifices that exhibit  ways of life by providing them money for livelihood and maintenance respectively.     

However, those who feel that commercialization of culture for portraying it to foreign leisure travellers can lead the native rituals lose their originality since to attract foreigners, the exponents tend to make modifications in their presentations, which can have an adverse impact on the the traditions as they become vulnerable to losing their originality and being forgotten gradually. They also  cite    examples of damage to artefacts and buildings exposed to tourist activity, which has an irreversible impact on native beliefs. 

In the end, I would like to conclude that tourism benefits the country with the revenue and also enhances culture  and tradition, which benefits society, but there is need to be attentive towards the adverse impact of this sector.  

Every country should have a free health service, even if this means that the medical treatment may not be available through the service because they are too expensive. Do you agree or disagree with this? Write in at least 250 words?

 Every country should have a free health service, even if this means that the medical treatment may not be available through the service because they are too expensive. Do you agree or disagree with this?  Write in at least 250 words?

Health is a fundamental right of every human being. Some people believe that a country should provide free health services, even if costly  medical intervention is excluded from such service. In this essay i would like to discuss this.

To start with, every county has poor people who cannot afford basic services. A free public healthcare system is essential to cater to their healthcare needs.If the government provides free health services in the country, everyone can live healthy as it is said health is wealth. Healthy people give more contribution to economic productivity, helping the country  progress faster. Also, by providing free health care the government can prevent disease from spreading.

On the other hand, there is widespread criticism of this proposal: excluding cost intensive healthcare interventions out of the ambit of free health will do little good since with new strains and types emerging and evolving in the existing list of diseases and ailments mandates expensive research, which will eventually take every type of treatment out of the scope of this policy, leaving  people helpless. 

Similarly, such a system will make it harder for the destitute, unemployed and the elderly - the most vulnerable group - high and dry since they will not be able to afford any remedy for their sufferings, exposing society to poor health conditions and since the state is vested with the onus of ensuring wellness of citizens, it cannot resort to such impractical policies.  

To cap it all, I would like to conclude that the government should include every service in the healthcare support system, otherwise it would be useless and would fail miserably in ensuring the well being of society, eventually affecting the productivity.  

It is being noticed that students do not study as intensively in university as they used to do in schools. What are the causes of this change? What could be done to improve the situation?

It is being noticed that students do not study as intensively in university as they used to do in schools. What are the causes of this change? What could be done to improve the situation?

Nowadays an increasing trend is being noticed that younger people  as they cross schooling stage and join colleges, they often tend to lose interest in studies. Some people often wonder about the causes of this new phenomenon and wish to find a solution to this.

To start with, students cross the school stage at the age of 18 when they become adults and they do not have that many restrictions in universities, which makes them drift away from their primary objective. Moreover, As most of the time students happen to pass through a very complex and stressful stage of penultimate years of schooling where they have to dedicate more and more time in pursuing a good score. During this process they often go into a state of social disconnect and are confined to study tables only. So when they enter the liberal environment of the university, they try to compensate for the time they have lost in school. 

Nevertheless, overcoming this situation is not impossible since it is quite easy to encourage youngsters to keep in touch with their academic pursuits. Universities should arrange some regular workshops and set up initiatives - that can include some rewards and benefits - to persuade learners to bring out their academic excellence. This would prevent them from disconnecting from studies. Also, parents should intervene and encourage  their children to be more involved in studies. On top of that, varisities should also implement  the system of regular examinations and assessments that will compel pupils to commit themselves to their academic pursuits.  

Overall, I would like to conclude that although it is true that disenchantment from rigorous study routines  has its roots in hard work done in schools, it is possible to convince university learners to study with dedication.