Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas (in words, pictures, music or film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no government restrictions on what they do. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
 |
| Restriction on creativity |
Art and creativeness have always inspired the
society, and have given it a reason to rejoice and enjoy the life, but
sometimes creativity tends to offend aspirations of some parts of social
groups. This inspires some sections to advocate keeping a check on what artists
can do though some others feel that freedom of people connected with arts
should not be curtailed.
Art has always illustrated and reflected the
aspirations of society and community from where it originates. Down the
centuries, it has been regarded as an icon of deeply embedded rich traditions
and culture by the creators and the admirers alike. Curtailing the freedom of
artistic expression would have an adverse impact on the outlook of the society
as it would make that society look like a ghetto of hardliners which is greatly
influenced by the fanatic zealots.
Besides this, creative people like painters,
dancers, actors, poets and writers have always stimulated renaissance and
revolution. Common people have always been positively influenced by the path
breaking ideas perpetuated by the creators of masterpieces in literature,
poetry, statues and painted exhibits etc. For example, Shakespeare, a renowned
playwright is considered to be an icon of creativity by Brits who still take a
lot of wisdom from his plays which he wrote with a view of reflecting
contemporary social aspirations.
However, creativeness as per some, should not
be allowed an unimpeded access to expression as it can have adverse impact on
the society. The creations of some of the artistic exponents can often lead to
social conflicts which in turn can offset and dilute the very objective of
creation. Some artists are often even termed as biased and selfish.
To sum up, I feel that independence of people
connected with arts should not be impeded: the exponents of arts are vehicles of perpetuating culture. Therefore, I completely subscribe to the statement.
