Some say that due to heavy traffic governments need to build more roads in metropolitan cities, while others argue this isn’t the right solution and may cause more problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your reasons and examples.
What other ways can be used to ease the traffic
Cosmopolitan - urban sprawl tends to include villages also
Metropolitan - no villages only urban
Why should new roads and bridges be constructed?
This will help create a bi-furcation between those traveling within a limited area and those traversing across the city
This will create more lanes for a variety of vehicles, rendering smooth flow at speed
Why should this proposal not be implemented?
The problem stems from every rising populace and poor public transport network and any expansion made in the city pathways will soon be overcrowded by cars and other means
Might cause more problems.
Can prove to be a recipe for disaster since it will cause ecological destruction
Such addition is likely to create more development around the new roads and cause not only more traffic but also pollution in formerly untouched areas
Solutions
Improving mass transit systems
Imposing systems like odd-even
Not allowing entry of heavy vehicles for some hours into certain busy roads
Nowadays, urban traffic congestion is the main area to work upon. To mitigate this challenge, some urban planners profess constructing new roads and flyovers. Nevertheless, the other lobbies are against this notion. The following paragraphs shall delve deeper into this matter.
To begin with, almost every urban area is suffering due to road congestion induced by heavy jams and poor road planning which consumes a humongous amount of time while commuting, and in case of emergencies, it is difficult to reach from one to another location quickly. However, constructing new roads and making a better road plan can aid in the situation, resulting in time saving and better travel experiences: this approach will enable creating different lanes according to the class of vehicles shortening the traveling time.
To corroborate, a pilot project was implemented in London, wherein additional lanes were constructed on the main pathways connecting central city and suburbs. This proved to be a resounding success: this helped speed up the movement of buses and cars, especially during rush and school hours. The users reported saving at least thirty minutes on one-way journeys, thereby alleviating their stress levels too.
Nonetheless, some quash the hopes being reflected in the former opinion, and fear that this is likely to precipitate failure and waste of resources and money. They feel, any new additions in pathways and flyovers would soon be occupied by more automobiles: the problem lies in rising population and poor mass transit systems, abandoning urbanites to be at their own device to travel and they must opt for their own means.
To conclude, disputes and criticism aside, I completely concur with this proposal, and feel making new roads will prove to be a helpful initiative in resolving the urban traffic imbroglio.
