Most high level jobs are done by men. Should the government encourage a certain percentage of these jobs to be reserved for women?
In contemporary times, a school of thought believes that lawmakers should earmark some portion of the high level posts for women, whereas others do not support this. In the following paragraphs, I will analyze both the perspectives in detail.
To start with, there are umpteen reasons that women deserve a definite percentage for high level jobs as they are equally gifted and can take ownership as effectively as men. On top of that, they can make better decisions in some difficult situations and have a wider perspective due to being able to judge calmly and adopt measures accordingly. For instance, Indira Nui changed the fortunes of a sick Pepsi, a cold drink giant, and with her leadership qualities, turned a loss making into a profit making organization.
Moreover, this will help transform the views of society and let females earn their due and break the stereotype image since they will be persuaded even by their families to take up these roles. Society will have broader perspectives and it will help in enhancing the economic output, and ensure social progress .
However, in spite of having numerous benefits, some conservatives protest against this proposal since they harbor misconceptions that only men are better leaders and cannot be replaced by women. Also, they fear that if for some top, reserved for females, positions appropriate candidates are not found, it will cause organizations a great loss. Likewise, some also feel that reservation is an unfair policy and will not let deserving people get their deserving positions due this criteria.
To conclude, a particular percentage of high level posts should be fixed for females as they have adequate skills and good leadership qualities that match the capabilities of males. This can help companies and society favorably.
