Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research and the academic world

Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research and the academic world.  Other believe that same information is too important or valuable to be shared freely.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.   

Arguably there is enough rationale behind making discoveries in scientific and academic realms public: it would do public good. However, there is a skeptical view on this, and many forbid sharing discoveries: it would kill the exploratory skills, as they assert.  

Ielts Essay Sharing Research Work 

Disclosing research work being carried out in the realms of science and academics could help evade duplication of efforts being invested by different researchers in   similar  realms. It could help speed up the research instead by enabling forming a synergy of talents. It has been observed that many a times, those with money face a dearth of expertise,  while  ones with skills lack funding. If such people reveal details of their work, and join hands, it will help their cause; eventually bringing around humungous benefits to mankind , in form of productive outcomes.

Having said that, a school of thought is vehemently against the notion that sharing will drive in benefits. This will rather make the research work lose its value. Scientific and academic research work is better kept undisclosed until some outcomes are attained since making things public may invite plagiarism, and many may want to misuse the inputs obtained through this process.

Moreover, owners of research should enjoy proprietary rights over the work they have been carrying out, and should be allowed to enjoy the exploits of their feats . Sharing the details of exploratory endeavors would deprive people of such opportunities. Thus, acting as a great impediment for the emerging talent, and will eventually discourage others from investing efforts and resources in this direction.

To conclude, although there seem to be valid justifications for concealing the academic and scientific work, this should be done discreetly and selectively: when the research aims at public good, making exploratory data public should be encouraged.