Many parents (mostly women) decide to stay home and take care of the family members instead of going out for work. Some people suggest that they should be paid by the government for doing that. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience.
With family systems undergoing a sea-change and nuclear families coming into existence, it is being observed that either the father or the mother chooses to forego professional pursuit to look-after their kids. This has resulted in demand that such people should be compensated despite some presenting a strong aversion to this proposal.
People deserve to be compensated for their sacrifice: such foregoing of a professional pursuit has helped the society in. Supporters of such benefits retort, unemployment is a burning issue, and governments are struggling to alleviate joblessness; such a decision always comes in as a boon in disguise: if these people had chosen to work, they would have occupied a place on which some other people are working – thus providing employment to at least one member of a family; thereby reducing income disparities in the society.
Moreover, such remuneration would be a true tribute to those choosing to take the initiative to ensure a healthy future of society, at the cost of their careers. In the materialistic world, it is rare to find people prepared to forego promising professional pursuits for the sake of the future of their children and thus the society, and such compensation could prove to be at least a consolation.
However, critics to this proposal consider it to be ludicrous. As per them, If such people remain out of job and lose money somewhere, they also save some; they do not need any external help to assist them, and this decision is their own and not forced upon them. Furthermore, such a decision would tax the state financially and would lead to many unwarranted consequences, like hike in taxes, etc.
To conclude, I concur with this proposal, and find such a compensation to be worthwhile and surely productive.
 |
| Ielts Essay Parenting and compensation |
With family systems undergoing a sea-change and nuclear families coming into existence, it is being observed that either the father or the mother chooses to forego professional pursuit to look-after their kids. This has resulted in demand that such people should be compensated despite some presenting a strong aversion to this proposal.
People deserve to be compensated for their sacrifice: such foregoing of a professional pursuit has helped the society in. Supporters of such benefits retort, unemployment is a burning issue, and governments are struggling to alleviate joblessness; such a decision always comes in as a boon in disguise: if these people had chosen to work, they would have occupied a place on which some other people are working – thus providing employment to at least one member of a family; thereby reducing income disparities in the society.
Moreover, such remuneration would be a true tribute to those choosing to take the initiative to ensure a healthy future of society, at the cost of their careers. In the materialistic world, it is rare to find people prepared to forego promising professional pursuits for the sake of the future of their children and thus the society, and such compensation could prove to be at least a consolation.
However, critics to this proposal consider it to be ludicrous. As per them, If such people remain out of job and lose money somewhere, they also save some; they do not need any external help to assist them, and this decision is their own and not forced upon them. Furthermore, such a decision would tax the state financially and would lead to many unwarranted consequences, like hike in taxes, etc.
To conclude, I concur with this proposal, and find such a compensation to be worthwhile and surely productive.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.