Some people think that you need more money to be happy, while others prefer to have more free time than money. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some people think that you need more money to be happy, while others prefer to have more free time than money. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Quest for happiness has always intrigued humans as they explore various ways to attain this elusive goal. There is a complete disagreement over the factors that lead to contentment since everyone has quite disparate views: some suggest money holds the key to being happy, while others suggest more leisure time is critical to this state of mind.

Being rich has always made people feel elite since it becomes easy for them to possess all the imaginable luxuries and comforts: one can freely party and socialize with friends, and nears and dears at will; go on vacations whenever one feels like, get education in the best of institutions, etc. Apart from that, being financially better off, are considered elite among friends, peers and society, and such individuals always hog the limelight.

Besides this, having sumptuous amount of income can also help people  fulfill their philanthropic inclinations and obligations; thus making them feel eternally happy. It is believed that, “Only one’s having ample resources at their disposal can be of real help to others”. Performing charity is a good way to attain eternity with the God, and charity is only possible if one has enough to give away comfortably.

However, how far can materialistic possessions go in ensuring happiness if the leisure time is missing? Having some free moments is considered to be more critical than anything else in this world. Getting some time to spend with oneself – in solace, and nears and dears always fetches satisfying and pleasant experiences. This not only helps in forming and strengthening relationships but also experiencing life to the fullest, in all its manifestations.

Henceforth, I feel although many may vouch for any single factor, financial standing, or spare leisure time, both are important in their own virtue. 

Governments spend a lot of money on wildlife protection instead of starting new projects. Is this a positive or a negative trend? Give your opinion and examples from your experience.

Governments spend a lot of money on wildlife protection instead of starting new projects. Is this a positive or a negative trend? Give your opinion and examples from your experience.

 

Ielts Essay - Wild Life Projects 

Striking the right balance between protecting environment, and continuing progress has become a thorny issue for almost every government, but more recently the focus seems to be shifting to protecting the wild fauna and flora, which of course has both some drawbacks and also great amount of benefits.

Protecting wildlife in all its manifestations is very critical to maintaining a correct balance in the ecology on the planet. The life, in all its variations and forms is strongly interlinked to each other. If even one of them goes missing, others would follow soon, and the ones left behind would surely be adversely affected. Wild animals and plants benefit humans in many ways; they ensure availability of pool of genetic diversity; ensure a clean environment by alleviating pollution levels; and, trees and green areas also act as the lungs of planets.

Furthermore, wild areas hold many secrets that could be of great help to humanity. Wild animals, humans, and plants share a long association – that has lasted over a millions of years, and each carries encoded references in the genetic build up about the evolution of life on the planet. This relationship is very critical to study of planet; its evolution; and changing conditions and environment, which can help to reveal several critical facts and also find solutions that may prove helpful for preserving life on this planet.

However, development should not stop at any cost, as some feel, for with the rising human population, it is becoming extremely important to provide, food, shelter, employment, health care to the people. This cannot be ensured unless governments prioritize new initiatives to develop, even if at the cost of wild life.

To conclude, saving wildlife is surely a noble task and critical to balanced life on this planet.

Foreign tourists must be charged higher fees than local people to visit cultural places and historical sites. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion including relevant examples.

Foreign tourists must be charged higher fees than local people to visit cultural places and historical sites. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion including relevant examples.

 

Ielts Essay - Foreign tourists must be charged higher fees

Levying foreign travelers with higher entry fees at various historical sites and other places of tourist interests has been a common trend world over. But, this has sometimes drawn flak from the various sections who feel that this practice is unjust.

Levying higher than locals, charges, at various locations of tourist and cultural relevance, for alien tourists seems to be justified. The local inhabitants contribute a lot, through taxes and other levies, a share of which also is used to maintain historical locations. This contribution makes natives deserving candidates for special treatment. Furthermore, whatever money governments collect from the alien travelers is often used to cover up the deficits in maintenance of such locations, and improve tourism infrastructure that targets foreign tourists.

Moreover, locals are the true owners, and unofficial ambassadors of such locations. Furthermore, it is also important to make young generation appreciate its national heritage. Creating parity between charges paid by natives with that of aliens would defeat the whole purpose; locals would not visit if they have to bear a heavy entry fee. Citizens are a quick medium of carrying around the word of mouth, which can create awareness in the world, e.g. when nationals upload pictures and write blogs about their experiences about tourist locations, the word spreads around the globe quickly.

However, charging alien travelers more has some serious drawbacks since this move may be considered as a bias towards the foreigners. This is bound to dissuade many travelers from visiting these locations who would be unwilling to pay exorbitant fee. It may also become difficult for travelers hailing from poor countries to afford visit to these destinations due to unfavorable exchange rates.

Hence, I feel imposing higher charges on entry of aliens visitors at tourist locations is fully justified, and the contra view  lacks substance since no parallels can be drawn between locals and foreigners.  

Nowadays the population of the world is increasing rapidly. New homes and accommodation should be built for this additional population. Some believe that more houses should be constructed in existing towns and cities. Others believe that creating entirely new towns in the countryside to accommodate these houses is the best way. What is your opinion?

Nowadays the population of the world is increasing rapidly. New homes and accommodation should be built for this additional population. Some believe that more houses should be constructed in existing towns and cities. Others believe that creating entirely new towns in the countryside to accommodate these houses is the best way. What is your opinion?

Rising urban population has led to the problem of creating adequate space for accommodating city dwellers. There is a whole array of suggestions raining in from every direction where some people suggest that it would be better to develop new cities in the countryside; others feel that expanding existing urban locations in a better option.

Developing and expanding new locations would prove be a practical option since large urban locations have necessary expertise and resources present to cater to the fuel expansion. An already existing network of utilities and services would not need a huge investment, and raising the things from scratch; this could prove to be highly efficient, in terms of time and money. The reason for this simple since the new development plans would get implemented quickly since these would not run into procedural hurdles, and would not require too many clearances and sanctions.

Furthermore, the charisma of existing urban centers refuses to fade away due to the close proximity of every imaginable facility, and venues of employment, education and entertainment. Therefore expanding an existing set-up seems to be a better option, for it would not only quickly amortize the investments of authorities but also contain the inhabitants of urban center within a limited premise and area.

However, shifting the pressure of population to new locations in the countryside also seems to be a viable option, as developing new locations would not only offer a wonderful opportunity of correcting the mistakes committed in the past, in terms of urban planning, but also give a chance to establish a bustling urban location with an up to date plan, that satisfies every modern requirement.

Henceforth, I feel that developing brand new locations away from the crumbling urban centers is a better option.  

Nowadays children prefer electronic games to other games and toys. Why is it happening? Is it a positive or a negative development? - sample 2

Nowadays children prefer electronic games to other games and toys. Why is it happening? Is it a

positive or a negative development?

 

Ielts Essay - Children Playing electronic Games 

Playing games on electronic gadgets have been courting controversies over their impact on the children, the most widely affected group. Several experts seem to be profoundly concerned about this recent development, and are seeking causes of this problem. 

The most common reason for children getting increasingly inclined to choosing modern gadgets over traditional games is the parents themselves. Despite parents denying this fact, it is the moms and dads who are actually encouraging children to take up this activity. It is said that kids always take up cues from their parents, and today when even the fathers and mothers are themselves inclined to always running their fingers on these gadgets, it is likely for the young ones to take up this activity.

The new development has some great benefits to offer with the development of cognitive skills of children. While playing games on these devices, which have unpredictable content provides abundant sensory inputs to the growing minds, in regards to problems, possible strategies that could be adopted to resolve problems and finally the implementation of a chosen way out. Many institutions have in fact taken up this method to extend benefits of seamless and effortless learning, to the students.

However, the controversy refuses to fade away as the vehement critics cite various shortcomings of playing games on electronic devices. The gaming content on these devices tend to overwhelm the senses of tender minds; to the extent that kids even try to emulate their virtual avatars, which could be, of course, violent too. The content in the games is also believed to be fueling aggressive behavior among the children.

Hence, I believe, it is quite easy to blame electronic devices for our own flaws, but judicious use is recommended, as this modern equipment has several benefits.