Some people believe that modern designs for schools and offices
with more open spaces are necessary. What are the advantages and disadvantages
of such spaces? Give your opinion.
Modern architectural concepts
promote principles of creating free buffer zones in the schools and work
places. This matter has become trivial enough since many experts have taken to
task of exploring benefits and shortcomings of such an arrangement.
Open buffers, act as a medium
that provide opportunity to let off the steam; and, thus a much required mental
relief to the employees and students, working and studying in cluttered
surroundings. Working in crowded rooms are often noisy that affect the
acoustics of premises. These often affect concentration; thus impeding
creativity. An open buffer in the surroundings can do wonders since these help
people relax and think clearly since areas lined up with either plants or other
decoration, encourage free movement; thereby providing much needed solitude.
Moreover, it has been
observed, open spaces can make a person feel at home even in a crowded room
with linear arrangements. Sitting in a surrounding with little room for
physical movement can quickly tire a person physically, and devoid him or her
of opportunities to stretch and get some relaxation that causes physical
discomfort; hamper efficiency; and as a consequence productivity. Having free
buffer areas can help generate physical satisfaction, sometimes by giving room
for switchover of activity, and at others simply by sight.
However, the concept of
adding free open space to offices and schools has come under fire from the
vehement critics. They consider such a practice to be a complete misuse of
available space in the times when accommodating population and businesses has
become a severe problem, due to scarcity of land. This may lead to
environmental disaster in form of sped-up deforestation.
Hence, I personally feel that
open spaces would surely benefit occupants of classrooms and offices.