SEARCH YOUR ESSAY

Sunday, May 31, 2015

Some people say that having a lot of TV channels is good, while others argue that it reduces the quality of programs. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Write at least in 250 words with relevant examples from your own experience. - Ielts Essay


Ielts Essay - A Lot Of TV Channels

Some people say that having a lot of TV channels is good, while others argue that it reduces the quality of programs. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Write at least in 250 words with relevant examples from your own experience.

The advent and subsequent spread of electronic audio visual entertainment, like television has bought in a renaissance of sorts – where the entertainment has become audience centric – and has led to rise in number of television channels that target specific segments. This has also led to deterioration in the quality of programs being aired.

An increment in number of channels is a result of innovative program planning undertaken by television studios producing and airing shows to suit the taste of targeted audience so that people - not intending to watch unwanted programs- do not need to switch off their television sets. The channels being aired have become subject specific, for instance, the channels associated with travel and lifestyle continuously show programs on various topics connected to this domain. This helps the viewers in gaining more knowledge in their area of interest, besides entertaining themselves. 

Moreover, more television channels means broader perspective and wider choice of programs and presentations – where each channel tries to present an event or a happening from a different angle – which off course prove very advantageous for the viewers; as they are able to gather more information and form a well-informed opinion.

However, the sudden mushrooming of the television channels has also led to deterioration of the quality of the programs being aired. The channels, in a bid to overcome their competition, try to include more and more programs in the iternary schedule, most of which lack imagination, resourcefulness and freshness. Every other show, especially the television serials and music shows look stale and lack taste.


To sum up, I personally feel that though a sudden explosion in number of channels may have affected the quality to an extent, nevertheless, this trend has enabled audience to watch and enjoy the shows it wants. 

Monday, May 18, 2015

People doing different kinds of work enjoy different amount of holiday time. Should people have the same amount of leisure time? Discuss.


People doing different kinds of work enjoy different amount of holiday time. Should people have the same amount of leisure time? Discuss.
 
Ielts Essay- Work and Holidays 
The busy schedules at work have made it highly necessary for the people to take time off from work, as doing this can bring in numerous benefits for physical and mental well being of employees, but there is a continuous debate over the tenure and period of the time off different categories of employees should take or be allowed.

Taking holidays as per the ranks and positions is sometimes considered to be an essential component of human resources management system. As per HR policies of various companies, the people working in locations that need intense involvement at work deserve to be compensated with suitable leisure time offs spans accordingly, since working on tough and diverse assignments can be taxing, and this also sometimes leads employees, in question, to socially disconnect from rest of society for the sake of job. Proper rejuvenation for such personnel can help in enhancing their productivity. Whereas, the people who perform general duties or are involved in less taxing work can get appropriate amount of relaxation even with shorter tenures.

However, such policies often court deep controversy as they symbolize ambiguity. Such provisions often lead to discord and uneasy situations at the work place because of disagreements between the top, middle and lower level managers; and workers at lower rungs, because managers at different levels of organizational hierarchy find it hard to convince their juniors over disproportionate allocation of leisure time to different individuals.  Besides this, provisions of taking and allowing uneven holiday privileges often leads to jealousy among the coworkers and colleagues as the ones getting lesser amount of leisure time-offs often start harboring ill feelings for their coworkers.

To sum up, I personally feel that tenure leisure time should surely be different for different levels of personnel: both face differing levels of scope of obligations and stress, and thus, must be compensated accordingly.    

Thursday, May 14, 2015

Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in workplace. Others think that the true function of the universities should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the course is useful to an employer. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

Academics or profession 

Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in workplace. Others think that the true function of the universities should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the course is useful to an employer. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
                     
As more and more people have started regarding education only way to securing a healthy and stable career, many have started proposing elementary changes in the ways varsities treat education. The section thinks that it would better if varsities taught only those subjects which were required in specific professions and trades as chosen by pupils.

Getting a job after completing the studies is on the top priority of a majority of student community so most of them want to grab those skills which could help them secure choicest jobs faster with the best of companies. It is therefore firmly believed that it would be highly conducive to gain expertise in those areas where the employers have a severe requirement. Gaining technical knowhow and developing finesse in specific fields can help in polishing the skills, thus helping the people in getting jobs faster since their skills would easily match the requirements of companies looking for skilled workers.

Moreover, making education employer requirement centric would bring around numerous for companies hiring personnel as the hiring organizations would not have to allocate expansive financial outlay to task of training the workers for the specific jobs. The money saved would enhance the productivity of the companies and also enable them to extend more financial benefits to their workers.

Nevertheless pursuing and imparting education as per employer requirements has its own hazards as the needs of companies keep changing; and relying on a specific trade area, also within a domain, would make the workforce specializing in a specific area redundant; this would eventually result in large scale unemployment. 

To sum up, I personally believe that the notion of imparting education as per professional aspirations, and avoiding other subjects, is full of faults; and it should never be put into practice.   

Saturday, May 9, 2015

Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in workplace. Others think that the true function of the universities should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the course is useful to an employer. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in workplace. Others think that the true function of the universities should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the course is useful to an employer. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
                     
Professional Course or Academic 
As more and more people have started regarding education only way to securing a healthy and stable career, many have started proposing elementary changes in the ways varsities treat education. The section thinks that it would better if varsities taught only those subjects which were required in specific professions and trades as chosen by pupils.

Getting a job after completing the studies is on the top priority of a majority of student community so most of them want to grab those skills which could help them secure choicest jobs faster with the best of companies. It is therefore firmly believed that it would be highly conducive to gain expertise in those areas where the employers have a severe requirement. Gaining technical knowhow and developing finesse in specific fields can help in polishing the skills, thus helping the people in getting jobs faster since their skills would easily match the requirements of companies looking for skilled workers.

Moreover, making education employer requirement centric would bring around numerous for companies hiring personnel as the hiring organizations would not have to allocate expansive financial outlay to task of training the workers for the specific jobs. The money saved would enhance the productivity of the companies and also enable them to extend more financial benefits to their workers.

Nevertheless pursuing and imparting education as per employer requirements has its own hazards as the needs of companies keep changing; and relying on a specific trade area, also within a domain, would make the workforce specializing in a specific area redundant; this would eventually result in large scale unemployment. 


To sum up, I personally believe that the notion of imparting education as per professional aspirations, and avoiding other subjects, is full of faults; and it should never be put into practice.   

Friday, May 1, 2015

Internet contains a lot of Information, however, sometimes this information is inaccurate or wrong. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Internet contains a lot of Information, however, sometimes this information is inaccurate or wrong. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?


Although internet has become a major source of browsing for, and retrieving inputs, most consider this medium to be loaded with plenty of misleading data which, as per some, instead of being helpful can sometimes be harmful.  

Even though Internet has radically changed the world of communication; and storing and transferring data, it has also brought along a malady of falsified and unverifiable inputs. Most of the data being loaded onto the web portals is actually unsolicited; and most of it is managed by those posing as experts in specific fields. It has been often found that inputs on thousands of these sites are, as good as useless because it is not possible to verify the validity of the data being presented. The information, news and data being reproduced is, most of the times, copied and pasted from a plethora of sites, which in themselves lack genuineness; this reduces the usefulness of data.

Furthermore, this modern medium of relaying, presenting and transmitting information has also created many self-styled reporters and researchers who, though hide behind the veil of anonymity, claim to be successfully conducting in-depth research into various fields. Most of these people present highly biased inputs and information which off course lack consistency and have the potential of misleading users and followers. This medium has also led to a sudden spurt in instances of scams and frauds of varying severity.

However, some people feel that numerous websites and portals are loaded with verifiable inputs, and if users are smart enough to judge, they always land up at the right address. As per them, intent of retrieving data free of cost is main cause behind users     being misled by unscrupulous people.


To conclude, I feel that internet offers really useful and accurate data and inputs.