Children playing team sports learn life skills. Do you agree or disagree.

Children playing team sports learn life skills. Do you agree or disagree.

Ielts Essay - Team Sport and Children 

Tutoring young minds about diverse spheres of life is an arduous task, but as per a few,  some burden can be eased by encouraging them to participate in team sports. There are, however, voices of disapproval over this issue.

Undeniably, participation in sporting disciplines that need whole team to play together can help drive in rich benefits for the growing minds: they learn an extremely critical lesson about social behavior when they interact with their team mates and learn to comprehend their personalities and words, and also reciprocating. Another very important personality trait fostered  through such activities is the spirit of team work and bearing the collective responsibility. Both these skills can prove to be pivotal in their success as adults, both in the professional and personal realms. 

Moreover, youngsters undertaking sports as team players  obtain crucial learning about emotionally supporting and inspiring each other; helping co-players bounce back from bad performances. This can prove to be invaluable for young individuals since as they grow up,  they inculcate empathy towards others, rather than remaining apathetic and self centered. On top of that, it is the team sports that carves out successful leaders and also those who follow orders.

However, there are those who out rightly reject the notion of team sports coaching children about practical life skills. Sporting activity in any manifestation, is a noisy way of exerting oneself and burning calories, and nothing more than that. This lobby proposes that young minds despite being inquisitive rarely absorb any knowledge unless it is transferred to them in the form of instructions.

In hindsight, controversies apart, team sports is considered to be laden with several benefits for the juveniles: they can grab essential skills that can help them grow as successful individuals empathetic to the society.

Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. To what extent do you agree or disagree? ~Sanchit

Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. To what extent do you agree or disagree? ~Sanchit

Cigarette is a carcinogenic substance which has devastating impact on the health of its consumers, but has an even greater effect on the bodies of non-smokers who are subjected to passive smoking. This has prompted concerned health experts to propose prohibiting smoking in public areas, whereas there are a few who disagree with it.  

The rationale behind forbidding lighting cigarettes in the public domain is protecting others from getting sick due to the smoke emitted by smokers. The side stream or each puff is laden with carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide along with other hazardous compounds which affect passive smokers more than the ones smoking. This can inflict bystanders with several lethal diseases like heart ailments, asthma and in extreme cases various kinds of cancers.   

The damage to the health of those around smokers does not stop here. It has been proven that inhalation of smoke emitted by smokers, has serious consequences on the fetus of pregnant ladies, as the chemicals in it can hamper the development of unborn babies causing physical deformities or brain damage, making them disabled for life.  

However, avid smokers oppose the ban by arguing that such steps are an assault on their freedom and are against the rights promised to them by the law. Similarly, others go to the extent of terming such a move as biased, they feel when society is surrounded by fossil fuel propelled vehicles and factories that discharge far more hazardous pollutants into the environment profusely, why should the minority smokers be discriminated against.  

In hindsight, I opine that smoking in public is extremely inappropriate and unattractive, as such misdemeanour could cause discomfort to someone and lead to severe medical issues to people in the immediate vicinity. Thus, such acts should be banned in public.

Because of the global economy, many goods including what we use as daily basics produced by other counties have to be transported for a long distance. To what extent do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? ~ Sanchit

Many conservatives and environmentalists believe that importing simple products which are utilized on an everyday basis from far off regions in order to cultivate better geopolitical ties can have negative impact on domestic economy of a nation and also contribute to the international environmental issues like global warming, while there are a few who disagree with it.

Most of the global trade is in contemporary times is dependent on conventional energy sources like diesel and other fuel oils for transportation of raw materials and finished commodities across long distances, which are a primary source of pollution globally and are responsible for inducing unsurmountable damage to the ecosystem.

Moreover, importing basic day to day consumables from other countries could have devastating impact on the local manufacturers and businesses as outside players can manipulate regional markets by mass dumping their goods which would make it difficult for native competitors to sustain their operations, forcing them to shut down leading to unemployment and affect the economic capabilities of a state by slowly draining its wealth.

Nevertheless, proponents of global economy hail it as a very positive step towards world peace, resolving conflicts worldwide and promote greater harmony among people belonging to different areas. In addition to this, it provides consumers with a wide range of consumables to choose from thus providing them better alternatives and improve their standard of living. Furthermore, this would create a competitive atmosphere for local ventures to become more innovative and produce much superior merchandise.    

To summarize, I opine that in the concurrent era of globalization global economy is a necessary evil which cannot be neglected as in current diplomatic scenarios it plays a vital role. However, this should be done in a controlled manner so that the damage caused by it is minimum. 

Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed at tourists. Others believe it is the only way to save these traditions. Discuss on both sides and give your opinion.

Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed at tourists. Others believe it is the only way to save these traditions. Discuss on both sides and give your opinion.

Ielts Essay - Cultural Exhibition

Exploiting culture commercially to lure alien travelers is derogatory and a recipe to disaster as per conservatives, for local ways of life. However, this view is not supported by the progressives who view this as the only the way to preserve native identity in the current world order.    

The purist view treats such attempts with indignation, and professes that traditions are the foundations on which societies evolve and prosper. Although they were practiced diligently in older times in their undiluted forms,  today they are being used as mere facades of the society for the tourists, by those masquerading as preservers, and are being largely modified to make them comprehensible for the aliens. This is diluting the beliefs and blurring the difference between authentic and contrived details, denting the beauty and completely altering the reason and rationale behind them.

Nevertheless, the latter view puts forth the argument that in an era when the onslaught of globalization coupled with proliferation of dominant cultures is becoming more prominent,  and especially when the young generation is overwhelmingly influenced by such changes, the only way for beliefs, endemic to a region, to survive and to be perpetuated is by remaining visible. This can only be done if more and more people across the world are brought face to face with the indigenous customs, and the money earned out of such endeavors can be used to improve the living standards of those engaged in presenting those values in front of leisure travelers. 

Overall, even though opinion of traditionalists may hold some water since they wish to preserve the local customs in their original glory, in the current era this might not hold substance: the constant push by global identity and dominant societies might obliterate those practices and settings that forbid exhibition.  

Some people believe they should keep all the money they have earned and should not pay tax to the state. Do you agree or disagree?

Some people believe they should keep all the money they have earned and should not pay tax to the state. Do you agree or disagree?

Ielts Essay Taxation

Taxation, in various manifestations, despite being historically practiced, and also being deemed essential, fails to dissuade critics from questioning the very relevance of this policy, who quote some interesting views to support their view.

Levies   form the basis of revenue generation of the state, since it does not have any other source of income, which in turn are used for ensuring smooth functioning of the government machinery, as well as delivering development. Establishment and development of infrastructure – ranging from transportation, communication, utility generation and supplying like that of electricity and water; subsidized health care and education; and housing, has an overwhelming reliance on the taxes. If these were not collected, where a nation would be, as the supporters suggest.

Similarly, the funds generated through tariffs and duties are used to support and afford the most critical service to the citizens: security and protection. Every nation must ensure that the natives are protected from  internal and external threats, and for this  maintaining robust law enforcement agencies and military forces is pivotal which of course is funded with the help of public money.

Nevertheless, those cynical perceive it as an act of robbing people of their hard earned money. They profess, when individuals struggle at their own expense – in  employment or business, and fend for themselves  without any external intervention – and  face various uncertainties, like loss of jobs or failure of commercial endeavors, why not  retain the money for own  pleasure and future.

To recap, controversies apart, taxes are a way to ensure a safe and productive social environment. Every citizen should be obligated to fulfill this responsibility since governments have been vested with these powers by the people only. Except for sporadic failures,  authorities use the funds sourced from such levies for public good.