 |
| Can Death Penalty Prevent Violent Crimes? |
Ever rising incidence and intensity of criminal activities
has pushed many to strongly vouch for continuation of severe punishment in form
of death penalties though some feel that awarding death sentence is not
required and would prove insufficient as far as curtailment of unlawful
activities involving violence is concerned.
Extreme steps, like awarding death penalties to the
perpetrators of crime of violence acts as a major deterrent; the offenders
always fear execution if found and convicted. The fear of death is the biggest
element that pushes one to dissuade themselves from participating in criminal endeavors
which might result in physical harm to the victims. For instance, many
empirical studies and analysis have revealed that introduction of death by
execution statute in early twentieth century in some countries, and
reinstatement in others across the globe, resulted in steady decline in the
number of incidents involving violent acts. Now, the people feel safer are able
to lead a peaceful life.
However, several deride this theory, as per them, the crimes of violence like homicides are in most cases committed due to the inherent animal instincts. For some, carrying out such acts is habit and a passion and no law of any severity can prevent criminals from involving themselves from such activities. Furthermore, brutal acts resulting in physical harm can often be a result of circumstances and not deliberate. This lobby is of the view that reformation and rehabilitation could help those intending to commit such acts, introspect an think about the impact their endeavors could have on others.
Overall, I feel that capital punishment is an absolute necessity to ensure a crime free society. All other proposals presented in favor of abandoning it should be overlooked, after all public safety is of paramount importance.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.