The government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to decrease the violent crimes in society. In what extent do you agree or disagree?
Agree/ Yes? Why do I feel so: justify reasoning
- The crime and savagery is
glamorised in the content, which inspires many, especially the youngsters,
to emulate the content
- Such content tends to
invigorate /trigger innate animal instincts of humans
- **These kind of portrayals render those with deviant
minds, plots and schemes to commit crimes
No? Why do I feel so:
justify
- Crime and violence existed even
when these modern means of entertainment were not there.
- Audience today is quite mature:
they can distinguish between the reel, and real life
- ** The producers of such
content just mirror what is happening in society around them.
The advent of movies and
television shows has fuelled a profound debate that these are also promoting
brutality and thus, authorities should regulate what is being presented in
these to mitigate crime. However, there is a contra view on this issue.
Whether the
government should regulate content that showcases acts of brutality in television
operas and movies, is a matter profoundly debated. There are views in support,
and against this notion.
There is an overwhelming
support in favor of the idea of imposing restrictions on showcasing of violence
in movies and TV shows. This heavily relies on the belief that the way content
reflecting savagery is glamorised and presented in an attractive manner, it is
bound to inspire many viewers, especially youngsters, to emulate such
portrayals, and practise it in their real life.
Moreover, many a
time, human behaviorists have observed that humans are equipped with innate
qualities that support animal instincts, wherein violence is considered to be a
necessary survival technique. It is feared that programs, like WWE match
telecasts and films depicting blood and gore, tend to trigger those
ancient responses among humans, who react accordingly and commit acts of
savagery. Therefore, monitoring and imposing limits on such presentations could
help bring down the number of illegal acts.
Having said that, there
is a lobby that rejects the former opinion. They claim that
unlawful activities have existed ever since humans appeared on this
planet, and this event took place millions of years ahead of the introduction
of modern means of entertainment; hence, putting the onus on the new modes for
rise in acts of lawbreaking seems to be quite ludicrous. It is suggested that
the government should not take this step: it will do little to
help.
In hindsight, even
though the suggestion demanding state intervention in regulating content
showcasing violence to regulate criminal activities seems valid, I feel that
this may not fetch desired outcomes, since unlawful acts rely on the perversion
rather than inspiration. Thus, I do not subscribe to the statement.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.