Firm discipline is a necessary part of
teaching children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
 |
| Ielts Essay - Discipline and Learning |
Making a choice between teaching young
learners in a disciplined or free environment has always confused humans. Some people
feel that for good results in academics and otherwise, it is highly essential
for the students to be educated in a closely monitored environment.
Discipline, especially in education, entails
establishment of a plausible mechanism that leads to systematic execution of tasks,
such as planning, defining and imparting lessons and setting deadlines for
assignments, which, in turn, encourages meaningful learning, on part of the
pupils. The students, as it has been observed, tend to grab the things much
better under the watchful eyes of their teachers, as the learners also fear
reprimand in case the performance is found lacking, or assignment or work is not
being completed within the given deadlines.
Moreover, controlled and closely
monitored environment does not necessarily mean punishing students for their shortfalls;
it also involves making students appreciate value of time and efforts. It has
been observed in many schools and colleges that despite students not being physically
or mentally punished for any shortcomings, they tend to behave responsibly and
put their all out efforts to achieve their best, since they know what they
could lose if they fail to perform as per the expectations of their tutors and
pedagogues.
However, for children to learn better,
it is not at all necessary to impose strict control. The creativeness knows no boundary,
and the children educated in an environment that sans harsh retribution turn
out to be intelligent and grow up innovative adults. People like, Thomas Edison
are live examples of this.
In the nutshell, I personally feel
although not subjecting children to harsh discipline may seem to be an
attractive option; it is the necessity for the good of the children
