Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed at tourists. Others believe it is the only way to save these traditions. Discuss on both sides and give your opinion.

 Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed at tourists. Others believe it is the only way to save these traditions. Discuss on both sides and give your opinion. 

Showcasing local customs is becoming one of the prominent means of generating income from the travellers hailing from other parts of the globe. Many are in the favor of the above notion and feel that this will help preserve the native culture. However, there are a few who register their disapproval.

Some are cynical about portraying traditions with commercial objectives, out of fear that this might prove detrimental for the authenticity of customs. There is a potential danger, these traditions may gradually become simply the modern means of entertainment, which will initially blur the distinction of customs, by virtue of being altered to make things comprehensible for aliens, and finally leading to extinction since many might start following those greatly modified practices. 

Nonetheless, a few are quite optimistic about this exercise and are of the view that many cultures have already disappeared due to the rapid development of modern society. Thus,  it is the need of the hour to make the native cultural traditions witnessed and appreciated by the tourists, so that these could be acknowledged across the globe, and hence visible.  

Moreover, using these to make money to engage leisure travelers is considered quite practical since many would consider it as a novelty and hail it. Beside this, it might become a tempting profession amongst local youth, who may be overwhelmed by the financial benefits such work might help drive in. Consequently, preserving and perpetuating tradition to the next generation may become an easier task, and thus prevent them from being lost forever. 

To conclude, I personally feel that although making cultural traditions profitable attractions can save them in some respect, the potential perils should by no means be ignored as it would eventually make the values and authentic flavor fade in the future. 

Children are facing more pressures nowadays from academic, social and commercial perspectives. What are the causes of these pressures and what measures should be taken to reduce these pressures?

 

Children are facing more pressures nowadays from academic, social and  commercial perspectives. What are the causes of these pressures and what measures should be taken to reduce these pressures?

The contemporary generation of juveniles is predisposed to pressing demands posed by their studies, the society around them and the overwhelming influence of the media in all manifestations. The source of these challenges are visible, but the panaceas os elusive. Thus, one needs to dig deeper.

The most prominent source of immense load on young minds is the need to perform at formal tuition. Constantly rising emphasis on testing has made life miserable for youngsters as they are caught between two extremes, learning and preparing for examinations, leaving them with little time for extracurricular activities. The crisis further deepens when parents also raise the bar of expectations from their wards, which many times also mirrors the social perspective. Since every parent wants their children to outperform those of their peers and social connections. 

Similarly, peer pressure and perspectives formed by engaging with electronic games television and the internet have a far reaching impact on tender minds who are required to adhere to the norms established by their mothers and fathers, and also address their own aspirations, fostered by engaging with those of their age groups and various external sources of  information. Most are found facing a dilemma. 

However, the panacea for this predicament can only be found if schools and parents make joint efforts. Where the former should reduce the frequency of the examinations, the latter should stop comparing their offspring and start seeing them as distinct individuals. Furthermore, there is also a need to make expectations more realistic besides, monitoring how young ones interact with the outer world.

In hindsight, although the situation is bemusing as youngsters face numerous uncertainties, things can be improved and life made easier for them  if parents and schools act prudently and embrace a sensitive approach towards young individuals.

Some people believe that public transport should be funded by the government so that it is free for users. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.

 

Some people believe that public transport should be funded by the government so that it is free for users. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your knowledge or experience. 

Why 

1.  It will allow the impoverished / destitute / economically weaker (poor) to travel to their desired destination…. 

1. Enable them get employment  away from their homes

2. Obtain education anywhere 

3. Reduce economic disparities blur the class difference to some extent 

2. It will also attract car owners, who will be inclined to abandon their vehicles and switch to public modes… 

1. Lesser pollution 

2. New roads and bridges will not need to be constructed.. Lesser ecological damage due lesser clearing of trees 

3. *** Lesser fuel import bills 

Why not 

1. It will impose a financial burden on the government. 

1. If no levies are charged from commuters - maintenance  and expansion of  public transport framework would become difficult

2. To arrange money, governments would have to divert funds from other more important initiatives and programs. 

3. Impose higher taxes on people 

2. There is a good chance that this facility might me misused

Should mass transit be afforded without charging access fee universally, is a million dollar question, for it does seem to offer some benefits, but the concerns raised are far more serious, and cannot be disregarded.

To commence with, the enthusiastic support for this suggestion stems from the assumption that this could empower the marginalised by allowing them to fulfill their travelling needs: seeking employment ,or education, in distant locations without needing to pay through their nose, something beyond their means currently. Moreover, many might be tempted to abandon their personal vehicles, and switch to public commutes, thereby mitigating traffic jams, and eventually, air pollution.

Nevertheless, such a move is bound to prove counterproductive and recipe for disaster: the state will have to bear an additional burden of not only sustaining the public transit network, in its current manifestation, but also impede the modernisation process,by virtue of the state bearing operational expenses such as fuel and spares, as well as the staff. Down the line, the system would become unsustainable and  unprofitable.

Similarly, this policy is likely to precipitate misuse, with the majority using buses or trains, and so forth, without any concrete purpose, causing unwarranted wear and tear to the fleet and rolling stock.To corroborate, such an arrangement has been tried and later abandoned across umpteen cities like Sydney, Moscow, and New Delhi,to name a few, wherein it was observed that nearly 75 percent of users, even during peak hours, were casual travellers undertaking journeys just for leisure, forcing authorities to roll back the plan.

In hindsight, this facility should be offered discreetly to those really needing free of charge travel  in mass medium of transportation, to ensure appropriate utilization of public assets and resources, and prevent abuse.

Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn about current events. However, others believe that they can learn news better through other media. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

 

Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn about current events. However, others believe that they can learn news better through other media. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

 Some uphold the notion that newspapers are the best medium to stay up-to-date with current affairs around the globe, while some profess that there are other methods that are more convenient. This essay shall delve deeper on this matter and come up with a plausible conclusion. An army of people proposes that the traditional method of gaining knowledge of the happenings world over are irreplaceable; these are considered to be accurate since most of the people engaged in presenting reports in this tool are devoted and unbiased professionals and committed to the task of ethically researching and presenting facts, convincing many that the learnings they find in this method are genuine. Besides this, several experts lean for this way of informing themselves since it does not require any special intervention to access news. For example, these can also be read in the areas where there is absence of electricity and network. Nearly half of the global population residing in remote areas depend on this paper-based tool of enlightenment about occurrences in any domain. However, some contest that electronic mediums are more suitable; one does not need to wait for the next morning to know about events taking place the previous day. At times, there is very little information provided in the newspapers due to the limitations of pages, and words, for an article published; therefore, many have turned to other media such as television channels, or their personal devices, to gain up-to-date in-depth inputs about anything. To conclude, in my opinion, traditional methods of disseminating news, despite lacking facilities that modern tools can offer, boast of enjoying unswerving trust of audiences due to well-researched reports being presented in this medium.

More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending time in communities in poorer countries doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses. Why is this? Who benefits more from this, the communities or these young people?

 

More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending time in communities in poorer countries doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses. Why is this? Who benefits more from this, the communities or these young people?
 

The young generation, hailing from affluent regions is reaching out to the underprivileged to help them grab opportunities to help them compete with the rest of the society to create a space for themselves but some are with the notion that this is only profiting the upper classes. This essay shall delve deeper about the causes on who benefits from such programs and come up with a justifiable conclusion.

An army of people is convinced that the youngsters who were born with a sliver spoon in the mouth would only be willing to participate in activities or careers that can be fruitful for themselves or their families; there is a trend among some to show the masses that they are humble and down to earth individuals and they can do so by being involved in charitable work which proves to be non-profitable for them. It is commonly seen many young celebrities would partake in non-profitable organizations or even fund individuals to support their educational or professional pursuits, which later discovered to only be an act to gain attention from the public to create a name for themselves. This instals a believe that the young rich generation would only perform acts of helping the needy if it serves them a greater purpose than those actually in need.

However, others do not agree that the youth who are gifted with the wealth would utilize it for the purpose that would only benefit them if they do unpaid labour of providing for the poor section of the society. This might be an opportunity for the lowest class to be at power by using this supportive environment that has been given to them, people also see this as a measure to bridge a gap between these communities.

To conclude, communities must take measure to uplift their social and economical status, by using all the support they can receive even from the young individuals who are willing to help them achieve such a distant dream.

Some people believe they should keep all the money they have earned and should not pay tax to the state. Do you agree or disagree?

 Some people believe they should keep all the money they have earned and should not pay tax to the state. Do you agree or disagree?

It has become an intense topic of debate among many sections wherein, some believe that keeping hard earned money with them is far better than paying taxes to the state, while others feel that paying taxes is worthy and fruitful which provides indirect benefits to its stakeholders, citizens itself in numerous ways.

It is wisely said that money put to use is more fruitful than not to. Taxes  collected from people are considered to be the major source of revenue for the state. The money collected is invested in various essential developmental services of the society. For example, building and expanding the infrastructural facilities, like communications, industrial estates, research and development venues that help the society march forward. 

As a result, these developmental initiatives benefit the locals by affording state of art facilities, in terms of transportation, healthcare, education, and so on. Thus, creating opportunities for improving the living standards. Also, contribution made via taxes to the state overall helps  in assisting people in need during natural calamities, and also during old age.  

However, some people oppose the ideology of paying taxes to the state. They do not want to share the contribution from their hard earned money as they find it safe and secure investing in other schemes or saving money by themselves and trying to use it whenever required. Apart from that, lack of transparency in utilising funds is also one of the main reasons why people feel that paying levies is futile.

In a nutshell, taxes collected by the government are indirectly infused within the society for the betterment of its citizens as a whole and one must abide by the laws and try to pay taxes on time.

Some people believe watching films is a waste of time. Do you agree or disagree?

 

Some people believe watching films is a waste of time. Do you agree or disagree?

Agree 

• Passive entertainment that does not stimulate any senses 

• Can create wrong notions about people, approaches and also instigate distorted behavior 

• People can go into state of disconnection from those around them 

Disagree 

• Helps relax, rejuvenate and also entertain 

• Can be a healthy distraction from mundane life 

• Can graphically represent and promote national, social and communal aspirations, and deliver important messages  subtly

• Help viewers satisfy their craving for adventure, suspense, horror, profound situations, and so forth 

Those skeptical of motion pictures term engaging with this medium as squandering invaluable time. Even though this perception has been widely propagated, it is misplaced and lacks substance. 

The  cynicism surrounding the use of this audio visual medium cites sporadic instances in support. This media is blamed for being unproductive and instigating distorted behaviour, wherein viewers, especially those with  deviant thoughts,  waste hours in sedentary postures, and instead draw inspiration from the plots, and engage in illegal behaviour. Nevertheless, umpteen human behaviourists allay these fears, and profess that the overwhelming majority, even youngsters, can differentiate between reel and real life, and consume such content to satisfy their craving for suspense, sufferings, and committing antisocial acts without partaking in them. 

Nevertheless,  this prolific tool of entertainment affords the most plausible medium of earning a healthy distraction from the mundane of hectic life, most humans are condemned to lead, and not only unwind but also rejuvenate fatigued minds and bodies, helping prepare one to go back to the same routine of meeting social, personal, familial, and professional obligations, with a refreshed mindset. Historically, mankind has indulged with various forms of art, to surmount hurdles posed by exhaustion, and films are just the modern manifestation of the same art.

Similarly, viewing movies can render an enriching experience by exposing music, acting, scenic views of the location they are shot in, social and traditional practices, and so forth, to those watching these. Many admit gathering knowledge about diverse regions, cultures, peoples, locales, and so on, by viewing cinema, without actually traveling

In hindsight, disputes aside, this allegation is founded on misconceptions, and unproven narratives; this way of entertaining oneself has empowered everyone to derive healthy and safe entertainment, besides obtaining abundant knowledge about disparate  corners of the world.